Page 3 of 3
Re: BOXING MONTHLY INQUEST FEATURE
Posted: 10 Oct 2011, 07:07
by Scottrf
DavidPayne wrote:Imagine if you could just turn up the atmosphere, here every word in the corners and not be subjected to the mind-altering blurb from commentators.
Yeah, or if they have to play commentary and Watt has to go home halfway through like normal, leave it silent rather than playing him on loop.
Re: BOXING MONTHLY INQUEST FEATURE
Posted: 10 Oct 2011, 12:06
by DavidPayne
How about two ringside judges and one judge is the punch-stats.
Re: BOXING MONTHLY INQUEST FEATURE
Posted: 10 Oct 2011, 12:59
by earsjohn
What about a more open-ended "what technologies could be used to support or improve boxing?" I'm talking about things like TV replays, motion detection, hawkers type stuff rather than technological advancements in things like training and nutrition.
Re: BOXING MONTHLY INQUEST FEATURE
Posted: 11 Oct 2011, 04:05
by freddydoesdallas
What about a look at the cost of boxing and if the top fighters are in some way forcing down the earning potential of domestic scene. e.g. Boxer A is a world champ on ppv and charging £80 per ticket to the fight. Does this reduce gates and the earning potential of up and comers on the scene. Also, does this harden the promoters hand and enable the promoter to strike a harder bargain to cover any possible losses they may make on Boxer A?
Re: BOXING MONTHLY INQUEST FEATURE
Posted: 11 Oct 2011, 04:05
by freddydoesdallas
What about a look at the cost of boxing and if the top fighters are in some way forcing down the earning potential of domestic scene. e.g. Boxer A is a world champ on ppv and charging £80 per ticket to the fight. Does this reduce gates and the earning potential of up and comers on the scene. Also, does this harden the promoters hand and enable the promoter to strike a harder bargain to cover any possible losses they may make on Boxer A?
Re: BOXING MONTHLY INQUEST FEATURE
Posted: 11 Oct 2011, 08:33
by tobyh5
"Would a "Winner earns more" system be beneficial?"
ie you have a total purse of a fight, chuck it into the pot and then give the winner 80% and the loser 20%. Watch them all give a little bit more then. Will make the final round a real humdinger everytime when they both know that one punch has a lot of dosh riding on it
Re: BOXING MONTHLY INQUEST FEATURE
Posted: 19 Oct 2011, 08:06
by Glyn Leach
Apologies chaps, I am a tosser.
After all your very helpful suggestions for Inquest subject matter I just haven't got room to fit the feature into the next edition of BM (out next week whore whore), although many of the points you mention are subjects in the November issue's articles.
I swear by the power of Grey Skull that I will run The Inquest again for the Pacman-Marquez report in the December issue.
Re: BOXING MONTHLY INQUEST FEATURE
Posted: 19 Oct 2011, 08:09
by DavidPayne
Tosser.
Re: BOXING MONTHLY INQUEST FEATURE
Posted: 19 Oct 2011, 08:41
by loaded_gloves
MightyWarrior wrote:
This
Love to see BM take on this subject, no one else is. To what extent to we think there are steroid cheats in boxing ? There's only been a few caught ( Holy, Jones Jr, Vargas, Toney )
Holyfield has NEVER failed a drugs test.
Re: BOXING MONTHLY INQUEST FEATURE
Posted: 22 May 2012, 17:05
by gasman
I have just read this month's Inquest and very good discussion and viewpoints from all three writers. I hope that this Haye-Chisora scenario is a wake up call for the Board to start being more attention to the needs and realities of their license payers and that they reform.
Re: BOXING MONTHLY INQUEST FEATURE
Posted: 22 May 2012, 22:54
by TerribleTerry
DavidPayne wrote:Can we have head cams for judges and referee please.
We can then have replays of "what the judge saw" or "how did the ref miss his glove touching down".
I'm mostly tongue in cheek here but I sometimes wonder.
Technology in the sport or its coverage would be an interesting angle.
I'd love to select ref cam or "no-commentary" sometimes.
Imagine if you could just turn up the atmosphere, here every word in the corners and not be subjected to the mind-altering blurb from commentators.
MMA led the way, especially in Japan, with ref cam technology.
I agree it would be interesting to see it in boxing:
http://m.youtube.com/#/watch?desktop_ur ... c_fw&gl=GB
Re: BOXING MONTHLY INQUEST FEATURE
Posted: 23 May 2012, 03:41
by MightyWarrior
gasman wrote:I have just read this month's Inquest and very good discussion and viewpoints from all three writers. I hope that this Haye-Chisora scenario is a wake up call for the Board to start being more attention to the needs and realities of their license payers and that they reform.
Except for Steve Lillis predictably saying he sees absolutely no problem at all with Haye/Chisora. You can't really be a proper journalist when you're on the pay roll of a major promoter - it's one or the other.