2k On Katsidis

Quixall
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: 2k On Katsidis

Post by Quixall »

yid14 wrote:I think Katsidis in 4 rounds. What I find incredible is Boxrecs world lightweight ratings Katsidis at 13, Burns who's just moved up from super feather at 12 ( :lol: ) and Mitchell at 6 ( :lol: :lol: ????) Great for records but do boxrec have an 8 year old doing there ratings?
Everyone has eight year olds doing their rankings..............

I think it works by pulling names out of a bucket from 1 to 20 !!

After much considered thought and due process i have come to the realisation that the ranking are a crock of shite :OhYes:
JDC
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2963
Joined: 23 Jan 2008, 21:24

Re: 2k On Katsidis

Post by JDC »

This thread wont have helped the odds on Katsidis. Think about it :roll:
Josh1111
Cruiserweight
Posts: 874
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 05:50

Re: 2k On Katsidis

Post by Josh1111 »

JDC wrote:This thread wont have helped the odds on Katsidis. Think about it :roll:
I've thought and still nothing
Lenny
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3656
Joined: 27 Nov 2003, 05:31

Re: 2k On Katsidis

Post by Lenny »

Burns is still a bit of an unknown for me. He is capable of boxing very well and maybe has enough of a dig to stop himself being walked through. But I don't think he can keep his concentration and workrate going for all 12 rounds against someone this dangerous and full on, if a bit predictable

Katsides holds most of the aces but I still appreciate what Coco said. Sure C-P, it wasn't a hammering against Guerrero but Katsides has had a pretty hard career.

Katsides to get to him before round 8 but no way would I be confident to risk 2k on it.

And why hasn't Billy Nelson bit yet?
Trojans44
Cruiserweight
Posts: 352
Joined: 23 Sep 2010, 14:05

Re: 2k On Katsidis

Post by Trojans44 »

There seems to be this tacit assumption that as Katsidis beat Mitchell he'll beat Burns. Might be worth remembering that Burns has already achieved what Mitchell has not and probably will never.

The 'beast' Katsidis gets the living cack beat out of him each time he steps up in class. Knocking out Earl and Mitchell does not make a world beater, even if they are English.

Burns has the speed, variety and workrate to make a mess of Katsidis face and win a wide points victory.
SteveDow
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1800
Joined: 25 Aug 2009, 20:05

Re: 2k On Katsidis

Post by SteveDow »

MightyWarrior wrote:
SteveDow wrote:I've backed Katsidis in a treble alongside Groves to beat Smith and Chisora to beat Big Larry. Odds of 2.6 with Betfred. Reckon Groves and Chisora are virtual certainties and Katsidis should have way to much for Burns.
Be interesting to see how that comes off.....Groves should win, but Smith is a very live under dog, so that's a probable, but not a cert...Chisora looks a dead cert - and Kat/Burns could go wrong for the Aussie too. Surely his only chance here is to knock Burns out cold - and that might not happen, as Ricky has been in with decent hitters like Carl J and Gomez - and while they are nowhere near the class of the Aussie, they hit hard enough to show that Burns has a decent chin ( think he was down against Arthur though...body shots was it ? )
Kat's face tends to mark up badly, so Burns has a chance to get the late TKO, if he can fend off Kat for the first half.
I genuinely don't give Smith much of a chance against Groves. He's not big enough at super-middleweight and he's facing a guy who hits harder, is more skillful and applies lots of pressure. I only give Smith a slight punchers chance and even then he'd need a hail mary to stop Groves.
Chisora will almost certainly stop Larry early and Katsidis (if he's anywhere near his best) should be too big for Burns who is overrated following the Martinez win.
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: 2k On Katsidis

Post by whiskey »

Hagler2002 wrote:
G0mez wrote:Apparently Burns looking terrific at 135 Hagler

There hardly going to say he looks terrible are they :TU:
True.

Its how Burn's deals with aggression, whether folds or not.

Katsidis put Casamayor through the ropes.
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23153
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: 2k On Katsidis

Post by mickey1975 »

MightyWarrior wrote:
SteveDow wrote:I've backed Katsidis in a treble alongside Groves to beat Smith and Chisora to beat Big Larry. Odds of 2.6 with Betfred. Reckon Groves and Chisora are virtual certainties and Katsidis should have way to much for Burns.
Be interesting to see how that comes off.....Groves should win, but Smith is a very live under dog, so that's a probable, but not a cert...Chisora looks a dead cert - and Kat/Burns could go wrong for the Aussie too. Surely his only chance here is to knock Burns out cold - and that might not happen, as Ricky has been in with decent hitters like Carl J and Gomez - and while they are nowhere near the class of the Aussie, they hit hard enough to show that Burns has a decent chin ( think he was down against Arthur though...body shots was it ? )
Kat's face tends to mark up badly, so Burns has a chance to get the late TKO, if he can fend off Kat for the first half.
Carl Johannesson had him over three times!
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: 2k On Katsidis

Post by Counter-puncher »

ah, mickey, moth to the Johansson flame.... :wink: :TU:
MightyWarrior
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13355
Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01

Re: 2k On Katsidis

Post by MightyWarrior »

SteveDow wrote:
MightyWarrior wrote:
SteveDow wrote:I've backed Katsidis in a treble alongside Groves to beat Smith and Chisora to beat Big Larry. Odds of 2.6 with Betfred. Reckon Groves and Chisora are virtual certainties and Katsidis should have way to much for Burns.
Be interesting to see how that comes off.....Groves should win, but Smith is a very live under dog, so that's a probable, but not a cert...Chisora looks a dead cert - and Kat/Burns could go wrong for the Aussie too. Surely his only chance here is to knock Burns out cold - and that might not happen, as Ricky has been in with decent hitters like Carl J and Gomez - and while they are nowhere near the class of the Aussie, they hit hard enough to show that Burns has a decent chin ( think he was down against Arthur though...body shots was it ? )
Kat's face tends to mark up badly, so Burns has a chance to get the late TKO, if he can fend off Kat for the first half.
I genuinely don't give Smith much of a chance against Groves. He's not big enough at super-middleweight and he's facing a guy who hits harder, is more skillful and applies lots of pressure. I only give Smith a slight punchers chance and even then he'd need a hail mary to stop Groves.
Chisora will almost certainly stop Larry early and Katsidis (if he's anywhere near his best) should be too big for Burns who is overrated following the Martinez win.
DeGale, who has a great chin, says Smith hits hard with either hand - and I reckon Smith has a much better chin than Groves, so don't think we'll see too much pressure - more like the safety first boxing that got him the DeGale win.

I'd forgoten that Burns was over 3 times v Johansson....yes, think he might be out of his league here - hope not though.
Bard of Boxrec
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13114
Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: 2k On Katsidis

Post by Bard of Boxrec »

Lenny wrote:Burns is still a bit of an unknown for me. He is capable of boxing very well and maybe has enough of a dig to stop himself being walked through. But I don't think he can keep his concentration and workrate going for all 12 rounds against someone this dangerous and full on, if a bit predictable

Katsides holds most of the aces but I still appreciate what Coco said. Sure C-P, it wasn't a hammering against Guerrero but Katsides has had a pretty hard career.

Katsides to get to him before round 8 but no way would I be confident to risk 2k on it.

And why hasn't Billy Nelson bit yet?
Burns doesn't have any dig.

I'd be shocked if Katsidis doesn't just walk through this guy
Tomasino
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7876
Joined: 24 Apr 2010, 16:39

Re: 2k On Katsidis

Post by Tomasino »

I disagree regarding Katsidis fight with Gurerro. He took an utter pounding in there, so much so that we could hardly watch. I am a big Katsidis fan but I hope Burns fights the fight of his life and pulls it out the bag, it will silence the naysayers and hopefully put Hagler out the game.
:OhYes:
Hagler2002
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3512
Joined: 28 Dec 2005, 07:04

Re: 2k On Katsidis

Post by Hagler2002 »

DaveBoyMorrison wrote:I disagree regarding Katsidis fight with Gurerro. He took an utter pounding in there, so much so that we could hardly watch. I am a big Katsidis fan but I hope Burns fights the fight of his life and pulls it out the bag, it will silence the naysayers and hopefully put Hagler out the game.
:OhYes:
It's my game I make the rules no fornicator is putting me out of anything :TU:
Tomasino
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7876
Joined: 24 Apr 2010, 16:39

Re: 2k On Katsidis

Post by Tomasino »

Hagler2002 wrote:
DaveBoyMorrison wrote:I disagree regarding Katsidis fight with Gurerro. He took an utter pounding in there, so much so that we could hardly watch. I am a big Katsidis fan but I hope Burns fights the fight of his life and pulls it out the bag, it will silence the naysayers and hopefully put Hagler out the game.
:OhYes:
It's my game I make the rules no fornicator is putting me out of anything :TU:

If only it worked like that. Go on Rickaaaay! :bag:
Cas
Cruiserweight
Posts: 338
Joined: 27 Jan 2011, 10:42

Re: 2k On Katsidis

Post by Cas »

Burns will get destroyed on the 5th of November.

Wouldn't put 2grand on admittedly but this is a big step up for Burns considering he hasn't fought anyone with a pulse since winning vs Martinez.

Kats inside 6 rounds.

I'll probably have a 100 no 1-6 Kats.

Will have no qualms on eating humble pie if I am wide off the mark, but just can't see Burns winning (unless a dodgy decision).

Good luck OP.
Hagler2002
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3512
Joined: 28 Dec 2005, 07:04

Re: 2k On Katsidis

Post by Hagler2002 »

billy bessey wrote:
Hagler2002 wrote:Well not quite :wink: But I've a big chunk of cash on this, more than I can actually afford to lose but it's like buying money.

If this turns out to be a repeat of the Martinez fight I have a one way ticket to the poor house.

Come on Micky, do it for England :TU:

I can remember a wise old man telling me to never bet more than a 1/10 of what you can afford on any one bet what happened???
You're right Billy, but this is one of them bets I'm really confident in and I'm prepared to take the risk of blowing my full bank on it.

A Katsidis win and I make a small profit a KO win and I make a decent chunk.

Come fight night I could easily lay it off for a guaranteed profit but I'm seeing this one through to the bitter end :TU:
reggaereggae
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4723
Joined: 21 Dec 2009, 17:01

Re: 2k On Katsidis

Post by reggaereggae »

the odds have tipped in Katsidis's favour. But warriors like that can't go forever in that style. Burns is ambitious and confident. I would not put money on this now
Trojans44
Cruiserweight
Posts: 352
Joined: 23 Sep 2010, 14:05

Re: 2k On Katsidis

Post by Trojans44 »

I think your all massively overrating katsidis. I think burns will win comfortably.
reggaereggae
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4723
Joined: 21 Dec 2009, 17:01

Re: 2k On Katsidis

Post by reggaereggae »

Trojans44 wrote:I think your all massively overrating katsidis. I think burns will win comfortably.
Burns has improved a lot and is on home ground (I think)
TheCobra
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3450
Joined: 01 Jan 2009, 15:11

Re: 2k On Katsidis

Post by TheCobra »

I think Katsidis will wear him down and crush him eventually. Burns has done well but I mean, look at who he's defended those belts against, it tells you everything about the confidence they really have in him. The Martinez win is his ONLY decent win, I mean that. Katsidis is proven at fringe world level to be a very lively and able operator, Burns to me is euro level, I just can't see anything else than a Kat win. Not quite buying money, I think Hagler is prone to a bit of exaggeration on his best and prices he got etc, but I do think it's a decent bet.
Hagler2002
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3512
Joined: 28 Dec 2005, 07:04

Re: 2k On Katsidis

Post by Hagler2002 »

TheCobra wrote: I think Hagler is prone to a bit of exaggeration on his best and prices he got etc, but I do think it's a decent bet.
I posted it on here the day the prices came out and also on the Betfair forum! Hardly an exaggeration is it :roll:
ryanst1982
Cruiserweight
Posts: 67
Joined: 04 Jul 2011, 16:12

Re: 2k On Katsidis

Post by ryanst1982 »

Trojans44 wrote:I think your all massively overrating katsidis. I think burns will win comfortably.
You have got to be somethig specia, f**king special to win comfortably Casamayor and JMM, 2 world class superstars were put on there arse by this machine of a boxer and With all respect Burns would be anhialated by such opponents. If Burns is to win this (which he wont) but if by some scenario he does, it will not be comfortable, i will wage anythiny on that. Burns better have a damn good gumshield!!! :box:
Hagler2002
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3512
Joined: 28 Dec 2005, 07:04

Re: 2k On Katsidis

Post by Hagler2002 »

Come on Micky smash his wee bollox in :TU:

Not quite 2k but I've £550 on the KO win @ 2/1 and 450 on the outright @ 9/10

If Katsidis wins, I'll take you out for a slap up meal on Monday night Billy Nelson out of my winnings as I'm up in Glasgow repossessing a couple of motors.
Hagler2002
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3512
Joined: 28 Dec 2005, 07:04

Re: 2k On Katsidis

Post by Hagler2002 »

Livingstone Cole wrote:I've got £100 on Katsidis by decision. That's all the gambling money for the month.
@ what price m8?
Dioufy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7351
Joined: 16 Sep 2006, 23:09

Re: 2k On Katsidis

Post by Dioufy »

Hagler2002 wrote:Come on Micky smash his wee bollox in :TU:

Not quite 2k but I've £550 on the KO win @ 2/1 and 450 on the outright @ 9/10

If Katsidis wins, I'll take you out for a slap up meal on Monday night Billy Nelson out of my winnings as I'm up in Glasgow repossessing a couple of motors.
So if the Kat wins a decision, you'll lose money?
Post Reply