Page 3 of 3
Re: Which Division Are You (And Should Be) In?
Posted: 14 Feb 2012, 16:23
by Tomasino
Goodnight, Irene wrote:I dont know the ins and outs of it, but it does amaze me to wonder how a guy can have the same definition as me, be at the same fitness, with the same body fat percentage, but weigh 20 or 30 lbs fewer. How the hell does that work!?
I struggle to be 80kgs (175lbs) or below, and that weight includes a distinctly low heart rate, 6-pack, and excellent condition.
If it isnt bones, what else accounts for such wide variances?
Do you have big tits, Irene?
Re: Which Division Are You (And Should Be) In?
Posted: 15 Feb 2012, 04:00
by hhaehre
I'm 6'2" and 210 lbs. If I got in real shape I would probably be around 195. I see some guys here are in the 6'+ range and 160 lbs or less. I guess I could make 160 if I had one of my legs amputated.
Re: Which Division Are You (And Should Be) In?
Posted: 15 Feb 2012, 05:01
by Thunder and Lightning
6'1" and about 205lbs so that makes me a heavyweight but i guess IBA would call me a "super cruiserweight", don't realy know what i would be in top shape i'm quite happy were i am
Re: Which Division Are You (And Should Be) In?
Posted: 15 Feb 2012, 14:43
by flatnoseflynn
Goodnight, Irene wrote:Currently, I weigh 85kgs (187lbs), but although thats a good weight for me at 5'8", I should really weigh around 80kgs (176lbs), so Im in the right division, but a little heavier than ideal. I have a broad-shouldered, solid frame by nature, but I train against that, opting for HIIT cardio over weights. Looking at the height of other boxers though, Id be a short Cruiser, probably with a short reach.
Whats your current division, and is it your ideal one? How does it compare with boxers of the past?
Say no more. You my friend have classic symptoms of
small man sindrome by for now pipsqueak
