BoxRec

FtmPress wrote:

scottyp wrote:Hi All, this is my first post so please go easy. I'm a massive Price fan and think he is the best heavyweight in the uk at the moment and was very disappointed when "chicken" Fury ducked him this week but after reading alot of the articles on him is he and maloney dining out on Fury's name, surely he should forget about fury and move on.

As i said please go easy on me

Fury has be talking about a Price fight and calling him out for over 3 years now so who dining out who name Fury now will need Price more than we need him. Lets all move on and see who is right

Yes FTM, I know and agree Fury has been talking about the price fight for years now but thats boxing and now you are doing the same by talking about Fury, we are all disappointed that he pulled out but again that's boxing, Mayweather and Pacman are a prime example and now we are going to have the issue with Barker and Murray, who's going to pull out first. But I think Price will need fury in a few years time as it pains me to say but Fury may never need to dine out on Prices name as he will always have the bigger profile due to his tv exposure. But hope i'm wrong, Price seems to be the better prospect at the moment but still needs to be tested.

Would like to see Price in with Chisora in the summer, surley Chisora will be made mandortory if he loses at the weekend. would you take this fight?

FtmPress wrote:

scottyp wrote:Hi All, this is my first post so please go easy. I'm a massive Price fan and think he is the best heavyweight in the uk at the moment and was very disappointed when "chicken" Fury ducked him this week but after reading alot of the articles on him is he and maloney dining out on Fury's name, surely he should forget about fury and move on.

As i said please go easy on me

Fury has be talking about a Price fight and calling him out for over 3 years now so who dining out who name Fury now will need Price more than we need him. Lets all move on and see who is right

Yes FTM, I know and agree Fury has been talking about the price fight for years now but thats boxing and now you are doing the same by talking about Fury, we are all disappointed that he pulled out but again that's boxing, Mayweather and Pacman are a prime example and now we are going to have the issue with Barker and Murray, who's going to pull out first. But I think Price will need fury in a few years time as it pains me to say but Fury may never need to dine out on Prices name as he will always have the bigger profile due to his tv exposure. But hope i'm wrong, Price seems to be the better prospect at the moment but still needs to be tested.

Would like to see Price in with Chisora in the summer, surley Chisora will be made mandortory if he loses at the weekend. would you take this fight?

Horse wrote:If the scales said McDermott weighed more than a stone more than he really did, then Price was really lighter than 232 lbs which is by far lighter than he has weighed before as a pro.

Nobody said the scales were wrong for Price. They were probably correct for him.

Karl Jade wrote:

Horse wrote:If the scales said McDermott weighed more than a stone more than he really did, then Price was really lighter than 232 lbs which is by far lighter than he has weighed before as a pro.

Nobody said the scales were wrong for Price. They were probably correct for him.

Why did they go wrong for McDermott? What changed?

McDermott was 17st 6lbs last night.

As I said, the scales were interfered with at the Price weigh-in.

Karl Jade wrote:McDermott was 17st 6lbs last night.

As I said, the scales were interfered with at the Price weigh-in.

I don't believe you.

Londonirish wrote:

the truth wrote:why should he fight towers?? towers has done nothing,

Because its a fight people want to see, had 12 Won12 KO'd 9.. Price had 12 Won 12 KO'd 10 Why Not???

Who wants to see it? I don't, towers has fought nothing but tomato cans you never heard of a padded record? Price has kod Dallas, McDermott and that decent American dude

Horse wrote:

Karl Jade wrote:McDermott was 17st 6lbs last night.

As I said, the scales were interfered with at the Price weigh-in.

I don't believe you.

And you're HORSE

Horse wrote:

Karl Jade wrote:

Horse wrote:If the scales said McDermott weighed more than a stone more than he really did, then Price was really lighter than 232 lbs which is by far lighter than he has weighed before as a pro.

Nobody said the scales were wrong for Price. They were probably correct for him.

Why did they go wrong for McDermott? What changed?

A heavier guy got on.

I do think Price is being overrated somewhat right now. Still a lot of unanswered questions imo.