Page 3 of 6
Re: Groves-Anderson postponed
Posted: 12 Mar 2012, 19:58
by Dan Dares
Can't see the injury being kosher. Too many other things suggest otherwise.
Firstly, its a WBO belt. Make of that what you will - the purse bids for Groves Steiglitz were ordered by the WBO about a week ago, out of the blue, which is when i reckon Groves's back first started giving him a bit of gip.
Re: Groves-Anderson postponed
Posted: 12 Mar 2012, 22:46
by BigHastie
Think I would be "injured" if my opponent was in that shape!!! SOOOOOOOOOOOOOO gutted this fight is off, if GG is injured and this gets rescheduled or if he gives up a belt for kenny to fight someone else then maybe all will be good BUT if he pisses off for a world fight and leaves kenny in limbo is not good for the sport!! I agree is not good for all these other fighters on the undercard too who are needing experience and exposure, wouldve been a good night of fighting all round i reckon!!
Re: Groves-Anderson postponed
Posted: 12 Mar 2012, 23:34
by Deserter
smoggy7188 wrote:People pull out of fights all the time. Its a bitch for Anderson but thats boxing.
![[icon_witsend.gif] :witzend:](./images/smilies/icon_witsend.gif)
It's this attitude that is damaging boxing so much.
To those of you going on about boxing being a business, you'd do well to remember that few businesses advocate treating your customers with contempt as best practice...
Re: Groves-Anderson postponed
Posted: 13 Mar 2012, 02:09
by FtmPress
You can all ways get tickets for Price vs Sexton plus 2 more titles at Liverpool May 19 from frankmaloney.com or ticker master be there or miss a great show in person
Re: Groves-Anderson postponed
Posted: 13 Mar 2012, 02:16
by lefthook82
lefthook82 wrote:
Surely you are not suggesting that this was a carefully orchestrated injury (my guess is back) that will 'miracously' heal itself in time for the WBO shot. That never happens

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/boxing/17348341
Well well, if only the bookies had odds up on this one
Re: Groves-Anderson postponed
Posted: 13 Mar 2012, 04:52
by leforge
Dan Dares wrote:Can't see the injury being kosher. Too many other things suggest otherwise.
Firstly, its a WBO belt. Make of that what you will - the purse bids for Groves Steiglitz were ordered by the WBO about a week ago, out of the blue, which is when i reckon Groves's back first started giving him a bit of gip.
He was doing sprints the other day he was saying on twitter! This is the second bill on the trot of Warren he pulled out off. The WBO fight on a German promotor bill.
Re: Groves-Anderson postponed
Posted: 13 Mar 2012, 05:25
by Counter-puncher
MachoMan09 wrote:You can tell the posters who only watch fights on the television from the ones who fork out for hotels and tickets. Likewise the people who've been fighters on the wrong side of a shady pull-out from the ones who haven't.
indeed
Re: Groves-Anderson postponed
Posted: 13 Mar 2012, 05:30
by Counter-puncher
yiddo14 wrote:MachoMan09 wrote:If Maree said anything other than that he believes George's injury is legit, he'd burn his bridges with Warren. So what he says in public about this doesn't carry any weight for me.
Those saying "you can't blame George, this is a great opportunity for him.." etc are effectively saying "yeah, he's bullshitting about being injured, effing over a fellow pro and God knows how many boxing fans, but I'm good with it". I don't get that mentality. I liked the kid till today and have paid to watch him box, I won't do in the future.
Not as simple as that although I agree with what u say.
It's boxing, strike when you have the chance. He could suffer a long term injury in the ring against anyone, fall over, clash of heads etc etc.
Then what?
Sure it sucks but unfortunately it's part of the sport. Does anyone think Anderson would do anything but the same if it were him being lined up for a shot at a world title?
if making a mockery of the contract you've signed, to basically pull out and go for a better one, is part of the sport, it's a part Groves can have all to himself, I want no part of it.
Re: Groves-Anderson postponed
Posted: 13 Mar 2012, 05:43
by WelshDevil
Very disappointed. Was really looking forward to this rematch.
Re: Groves-Anderson postponed
Posted: 13 Mar 2012, 07:09
by DavidPayne
I won, fkking won, tickets at 2pm, by 3.30pm it was off.
So you think your luck has changed......I was in A&E with my young lad at the time when I got the call.....by the time I checked Twitter later....
Re: Groves-Anderson postponed
Posted: 13 Mar 2012, 08:01
by GlobalBox
Perhaps if this is what we all think it is and he beats Stieglitz then give Kenny first shot at the title, its the WBO which is well known for its generosity in terms of challengers in Britain, at least give the man something to strive for, he must be devestated after this loss of opportunity plus earnings.
Re: Groves-Anderson postponed
Posted: 13 Mar 2012, 08:27
by Bard of Boxrec
I wasn't familiar with the first fight, was there any controversy in it? If not, why was this fight happening again anyway?
Re: Groves-Anderson postponed
Posted: 13 Mar 2012, 08:32
by leforge
How long before ticket holders like myself get a refund bet it takes time!
Re: Groves-Anderson postponed
Posted: 13 Mar 2012, 08:42
by Counter-puncher
Riddick Blowe wrote:I wasn't familiar with the first fight, was there any controversy in it? If not, why was this fight happening again anyway?
anderson had groves hurt, knocked him down i think in around the 3rd/4th? then Groves came back had Anderson blowing with bodyshots, stopped him around the 7th i think. anderson got himself into mando position, i think, and it was well-known he only had about 2 weeks to prepare for the last one-.
Re: Groves-Anderson postponed
Posted: 13 Mar 2012, 08:55
by iamasadlittleboy
digzee wrote:It's not just Kenny missing out here what about all the undercard fighters i'm sure they were relying on the paycheck an some good exposure. Also I bet chunkys jealous thinking he had overtaken Groves with his euro title but while he's in limbo Groves has a great chance at winning a world title. Anyone think if Groves wins FW will match them both or will he just feed him the usual bums for a couple of years?
Gavin, Skeete, Saunders and Buglioni all miss out due to Groves.
Back in December (when Groves did his hand and DeGale later pulled out) Damon Jones' debut was called off, he's only just debuted this past week. Awful move by Groves but did anyone ever think the Groves/Booth-Warren partnership was going to work well?
Re: Groves-Anderson postponed
Posted: 13 Mar 2012, 09:07
by daisycat
As a allegedly subscriber im gutted and gutted for anderson too and all the lads on the undercard. What is the point in even subscribing???
Anyone know if Booth has been able to do this deal direct with the Germans and cut Fran k out of the loop?
Re: Groves-Anderson postponed
Posted: 13 Mar 2012, 09:11
by leforge
daisycat wrote:As a Allegedly channel subscriber im gutted and gutted for anderson too and all the lads on the undercard. What is the point in even subscribing???
Anyone know if Booth has been able to do this deal direct with the Germans and cut Fran k out of the loop?
The Germans won the purse bid. Warren only promotes him in the UK not overseas the fight be on his channel though. He pulled out in December with an injury too.
Re: Groves-Anderson postponed
Posted: 13 Mar 2012, 09:19
by Final round
Dean Powell travelled over for the purse bids
Re: Groves-Anderson postponed
Posted: 13 Mar 2012, 09:58
by Dan Dares
King Geedorah wrote:As for the situation, if members of the press speculate on the synergy of the Stieglitz/WBO situation then Groves will produce a medical note, as doctors will happily provide written proof of a back injury, and kill that line of speculation stone dead. This was the case when Wlad-Haye fell apart the first time and the business with Setanta took place also, people had their theories etc. but you couldn’t argue with the doctor’s prognosis.
I have in my hand a piece of paper........
Re: Groves-Anderson postponed
Posted: 13 Mar 2012, 10:05
by daisycat
leforge wrote:daisycat wrote:As a Allegedly channel subscriber im gutted and gutted for anderson too and all the lads on the undercard. What is the point in even subscribing???
Anyone know if Booth has been able to do this deal direct with the Germans and cut Fran k out of the loop?
The Germans won the purse bid. Warren only promotes him in the UK not overseas the fight be on his channel though. He pulled out in December with an injury too.
So by doing this stunt, Booth and Groves have effectively shafted Warrren and B allegedly subscribers?
Re: Groves-Anderson postponed
Posted: 13 Mar 2012, 10:14
by milpool
Does anyone here know George? He might be actually injured...
Or am I so naiive? 8)
Re: Groves-Anderson postponed
Posted: 13 Mar 2012, 10:43
by whiskey
I hate this sort of snide sh*t
That's three fights now he has shrugged off - and I know about 18 people who've lost about £2,500 in train fares and arrangements.
They lost on previous bouts too. Bet Kenny is seething.
Re: Groves-Anderson postponed
Posted: 13 Mar 2012, 11:03
by leforge
G0mez wrote:I hate this sort of snide sh*t
That's three fights now he has shrugged off - and I know about 18 people who've lost about £2,500 in train fares and arrangements.
They lost on previous bouts too. Bet Kenny is seething.
Three fights thought it was 2?
Re: Groves-Anderson postponed
Posted: 13 Mar 2012, 13:27
by bigped
plane tickets from edinburgh and hotels ect all paid for all down the toilet, thank you groves so so pissed off, honestly dont think he was gonna fight him but as it was last week we all kinda changed our minds and thought he must be but no old back goes.
Re: Groves-Anderson postponed
Posted: 13 Mar 2012, 14:12
by Glyn Leach
daisycat wrote:As a Allegedly channel subscriber im gutted and gutted for anderson too and all the lads on the undercard. What is the point in even subscribing???
Anyone know if Booth has been able to do this deal direct with the Germans and cut Fran k out of the loop?
The Germans won the purse bid to stage this fight, Warren has no promotional involvement and he is not Groves's manager, Booth is. No reason why Booth shouldn't deal directly with the Germans under those circumstances. Hard to see how FW would benefit from the cancellation of his own show as he will not be getting paid off the Groves-Stieglitz fight. If Groves wins, FW would promote any defences in Britain, there is that. But he has lost a major show and an important subscription driver for allegedly, any benefit Warren might get (the win isn't guaranteed) is unlikely to be until autumn at the earliest because no boxing promoter in his right mind would run against the European Championships and the Olympics. Also there is no guarantee that 456 would even show the Stielitz fight as they will face rivalry from Sky in the bidding. Doubt FW is delighted about all this.