ALI wrote:
Yes, he would, he'd blitz him all over again, you'd be nuts (or blind) to think otherwise. Mitchell could'nt take his power, that was very evident, the result would be exactly the same, if not a quicker stoppage this time around.
How do you work that out with Katsidis on the decline and certainly less of a fighter now than when he boxed Mitchell in May'10 yet Mitchell is arguably coming off a career best performance against John Murray and a better fighter now physically and mentally? Even your biased mind must see the difference between Mitchell v Katsidis and Mitchell v Murray? The result certainly wouldn't be the same, and I'm not nuts or blind. I would say Burns v Murray would be more of a 50/50 fight. The Mitchell who boxed Johannson, Prescott and Murray will beat Burns, the Mitchell who boxed Katsidis wouldn't beat Burns. Both at their best Mitchell wins. Burns hasn't the power worry Mitchell.
Keep taking the drugs mate,John Murray and Kevin had a slugfeast and if you think fighting like that wins you world titles your wrong!!!!! hence Kevin and John not having 1 and Ricky having won 2 SIMPLESS
I dont take drugs Billy, you seem to be getting very uptight. Calm down a bit, it causes high blood pressure. Anyway the fight I watched Mitchell outboxed Murray, not outslugged him. Just as Mitchell outboxed Prescott as he can do both, box or slug it out. Some fighters cant do both, can Burns? Maybe or maybe not but I wont go and discredit Burns like you do Mitchell and Murray because thats distasteful. Just as I acknowledge that Mitchell and Murray are good fighters, I also acknowledge that Burns is a good fighter as well. The way you carry on on here is childish, its actually embarrassing. I wouldn't say Burns stands out more than Murray or Mitchell, they are all good. We all know about timings of fights and Burns got Katsidis at the right time, Kastsidis wasn't the fighter he was but thats taking nothing away from Burns. Who knows, he may have beat a peak Katsidis but we'll never know. Also fights don't work like that - Because Fighter A loses to Fighter C but Fighter B beats Fighter C doesn't mean Fighter B will beat Fighter A. You should know that being a trainer, different styles make for different fights
Good point James, exactly what I was thinking