Page 3 of 4
Re: McIntosh v Bellew Betting thread.
Posted: 27 Apr 2012, 17:57
by exittored
Terrible performance from McIntosh, didn't seem interested from the start or focused on his gameplan.
Bellew did his job and got him out of there but still not convinced he's anything more then domestic level although i hope Bellew proves me wrong.
Re: McIntosh v Bellew Betting thread.
Posted: 27 Apr 2012, 17:58
by exittored
Ismayl Silakh, the future of the Light Heavyweight division is fighting tonight on espn.
Re: McIntosh v Bellew Betting thread.
Posted: 27 Apr 2012, 17:58
by Craig14
tommo100 wrote:cleverley is hiding behind the sofa now!
well he better come out, surely there gonna drag another no-hope european with a padded record over for him soon.
Re: McIntosh v Bellew Betting thread.
Posted: 27 Apr 2012, 17:59
by TheCobra
I think based on tonight and Bellew's performance against Cleverly I think he is well above the domestic level guys. I can see Bellew getting a Euro title and being a fringe world level guy, he has the right attitude to keep improving and who knows might get a world title one day.
Re: McIntosh v Bellew Betting thread.
Posted: 27 Apr 2012, 17:59
by leforge
yid14 wrote:tommo100 wrote:cleverley is hiding behind the sofa now!
well he better come out, surely there gonna drag another no-hope european with a padded record over for him soon.
Its Hopkins in big summer fight you not heard!
Re: McIntosh v Bellew Betting thread.
Posted: 27 Apr 2012, 18:01
by Craig14
leforge wrote:yid14 wrote:tommo100 wrote:cleverley is hiding behind the sofa now!
well he better come out, surely there gonna drag another no-hope european with a padded record over for him soon.
Its Hopkins in big summer fight you not heard!
Really oh dear.....
Re: McIntosh v Bellew Betting thread.
Posted: 27 Apr 2012, 18:02
by states
leforge wrote:
Its Hopkins in big summer fight you not heard!
I've heard Hopkins turned down Frank's very generous offer, which hasn't actually been offered, already, so it's on hold. Who'd have thunk it
![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
. There's no truth in the rumour that Hopkins hasn't got a fornicating clue who Cleverly is.
Re: McIntosh v Bellew Betting thread.
Posted: 27 Apr 2012, 18:02
by keithmoonhangover
That's what's wrong with our sport right there. a guy who is 1-10 is allowed in the ring with a hot prospect. The BBBofC should be ashamed.
Re: McIntosh v Bellew Betting thread.
Posted: 27 Apr 2012, 18:08
by ShadrachSimmo
keithmoonhangover wrote:That's what's wrong with our sport right there. a guy who is 1-10 is allowed in the ring with a hot prospect. The BBBofC should be ashamed.
Dan naylor had never been stopped and by his own admission colquhoun had never stopped anyone pro or am.
Re: McIntosh v Bellew Betting thread.
Posted: 27 Apr 2012, 18:10
by keithmoonhangover
ShadrachSimmo wrote:keithmoonhangover wrote:That's what's wrong with our sport right there. a guy who is 1-10 is allowed in the ring with a hot prospect. The BBBofC should be ashamed.
Dan naylor had never been stopped and by his own admission colquhoun had never stopped anyone pro or am.
I know that mate. But that's ten defeats on the bounce. Don't you think the BBBofC have a duty to only sanction more even fights.
Re: McIntosh v Bellew Betting thread.
Posted: 27 Apr 2012, 18:11
by keithmoonhangover
And now we have a 3-78 fighter. It's wrong.
Re: McIntosh v Bellew Betting thread.
Posted: 27 Apr 2012, 18:16
by ShadrachSimmo
keithmoonhangover wrote:And now we have a 3-78 fighter. It's wrong.
Whats wrong? You need journeyman in boxing. Young fighters have to learn their trade. Going straight in with fellow novices or champions doesnt give you that.
Re: McIntosh v Bellew Betting thread.
Posted: 27 Apr 2012, 18:17
by Craig14
keithmoonhangover wrote:And now we have a 3-78 fighter. It's wrong.
oi watch your mouth that's one of ours
![[icon_e_surprised.gif] :oo](./images/smilies/icon_e_surprised.gif)
Re: McIntosh v Bellew Betting thread.
Posted: 27 Apr 2012, 18:19
by states
ShadrachSimmo wrote:keithmoonhangover wrote:And now we have a 3-78 fighter. It's wrong.
Whats wrong? You need journeyman in boxing. Young fighters have to learn their trade. Going straight in with fellow novices or champions doesnt give you that.
There's journeymen and then there's punching bags though. I don't know what you learn in a fight you're guaranteed to win that you can't learn in sparring.
Re: McIntosh v Bellew Betting thread.
Posted: 27 Apr 2012, 18:20
by tommo100
keithmoonhangover wrote:And now we have a 3-78 fighter. It's wrong.
it`s a living mate,he`ll be happy picking up his £700 and looking forward to fighting again in a few weeks,providing he`s healthy,i don`t see anything wrong with it
anyone can pick up a pro license as long as you pass the medical and ar`nt an axe murderer
Re: McIntosh v Bellew Betting thread.
Posted: 27 Apr 2012, 18:21
by keithmoonhangover
ShadrachSimmo wrote:keithmoonhangover wrote:And now we have a 3-78 fighter. It's wrong.
Whats wrong? You need journeyman in boxing. Young fighters have to learn their trade. Going straight in with fellow novices or champions doesnt give you that.
That's not the point. If Greaves loses this one, it's 25 loses on the bounce. A prospect learning should not be the reason for this fight being made.
Re: McIntosh v Bellew Betting thread.
Posted: 27 Apr 2012, 18:22
by keithmoonhangover
yid14 wrote:keithmoonhangover wrote:And now we have a 3-78 fighter. It's wrong.
oi watch your mouth that's one of ours
![[icon_e_surprised.gif] :oo](./images/smilies/icon_e_surprised.gif)
Hello mate. How/where are you?
Re: McIntosh v Bellew Betting thread.
Posted: 27 Apr 2012, 18:25
by ShadrachSimmo
states wrote:ShadrachSimmo wrote:keithmoonhangover wrote:And now we have a 3-78 fighter. It's wrong.
Whats wrong? You need journeyman in boxing. Young fighters have to learn their trade. Going straight in with fellow novices or champions doesnt give you that.
There's journeymen and then there's punching bags though. I don't know what you learn in a fight you're guaranteed to win that you can't learn in sparring.
Getting the rounds in in a pro fight is what is important. We know journeyman are expected to lose.
Re: McIntosh v Bellew Betting thread.
Posted: 27 Apr 2012, 18:29
by Horse
What happened to Watson vs Cook and Thompson vs Corcoran?
Why are Sky showing this low level rubbish?
Re: McIntosh v Bellew Betting thread.
Posted: 27 Apr 2012, 18:31
by Craig14
keithmoonhangover wrote:yid14 wrote:keithmoonhangover wrote:And now we have a 3-78 fighter. It's wrong.
oi watch your mouth that's one of ours
![[icon_e_surprised.gif] :oo](./images/smilies/icon_e_surprised.gif)
Hello mate. How/where are you?
Hello mate, still in Auckland and allgood.
Hope all's well with you and yours.

Re: McIntosh v Bellew Betting thread.
Posted: 27 Apr 2012, 18:34
by keithmoonhangover
Horse wrote:What happened to Watson vs Cook and Thompson vs Corcoran?
Why are Sky showing this low level rubbish?
I agree Horse.
Re: McIntosh v Bellew Betting thread.
Posted: 27 Apr 2012, 18:42
by Craig14
Casio wrote:keithmoonhangover wrote:Horse wrote:What happened to Watson vs Cook and Thompson vs Corcoran?
Why are Sky showing this low level rubbish?
I agree Horse.
Cook pulled out of the fight last week so Watson ended up fighting Darren Hamilton and Hamilton won 77-76 on points.
Wow that's abit of a turn-up.
Re: McIntosh v Bellew Betting thread.
Posted: 27 Apr 2012, 19:00
by Horse
That was a poor show.
I hope Hearn is going to be offering better than that in the future with their new Sky deal.
Re: McIntosh v Bellew Betting thread.
Posted: 27 Apr 2012, 19:15
by Alexey Uralets
Bellew was really good. Defo i wanna see Bellew-Cleverly rematch.
Re: McIntosh v Bellew Betting thread.
Posted: 27 Apr 2012, 19:17
by Tommy Gunn13
Horse wrote:That was a poor show.
I hope Hearn is going to be offering better than that in the future with their new Sky deal.
One live fight do you mean???
Pehaps this is the way forward now Pretty Boy Hearn has control.. I know it was a Coldwell show,but poor Dave didnt even get a LIVE word on Tv........