Page 3 of 3

Re: Froch Vs Cleverley

Posted: 31 May 2012, 08:42
by Bard of Boxrec
whatever man, why don't you just keep thinking Cleverly is a bona fide world champ (but look at his pretty golden belt he is so proud of!!), and we'll check back when he gets crushed by a Yusef Mack level fighter. :TU:

Re: Froch Vs Cleverley

Posted: 31 May 2012, 09:05
by NazNaci1
Tony has a right to his opinion and to be fair, as I have said on many occassions, Nathan has stamina, a good chin and plenty of bottle. What he does lack is an ambitious promoter, genuine boxing skills (Tony and Mohammedi, for example were able to outbox him) and he is too eager to get stuck in and against the top guys, heart and stamina will only take you so far and Fw@nk knows this.

I mean fighting Karpency, pressuring the WBO to agree to Krasniqi, after they said 'no', tells us all we need to know. None of this is Nathan's fault as I am sure he would have no qualms going in there with the best and wouldn't mind losing, either. W@rren is protecting his main asset, fighting at home, poor opponents, making a few quid for himself........sounds familiar, doesn't it?

Re: Froch Vs Cleverley

Posted: 31 May 2012, 10:02
by earsjohn
From Nathan Cleverly's Twitter yesterday....

@NathanClev: Spoke to my promoter this morning .... have asked him to make the Bellew fight .... lets do this!