Page 3 of 3

Re: Spoiler - Audley v Wilder

Posted: 28 Apr 2013, 09:21
by el_grande_mauro_mina
Syntax Error wrote:
Finn wrote:i think if we are all honest we knew the outcome of this fight before it happened i even nearly covered my small bet with some money on wilder in the 1st but couldnt bring myself to bet against the guy i support.

Maybe Audley should look at having a fairwell fight against someone then at becoming a trainer and seek a world title that way, he's certainly got more to offer in boxing.Incidentally apart from getting his words muddled up and pronouncing fury wrong i thought Wilder came across as very likeable and did what he was expected to do with passion.
I'm not sure a farewell fight for Harrison is wise or warranted.

Farewell fights are for celebrated fighters that have earned it.

Harrison has conned enough money out of boxing & just needs to go away & seek alternative employment, while he still has his faculties & considerable wealth intact.
Good post SE.

Last thing Audley needs is another win when he has claimed his 'redemption'. He is best off going away and living his life in the States, he has made his money and he has done some big things with his life. Get out while he still has his marbles.

Re: Spoiler - Audley v Wilder

Posted: 28 Apr 2013, 09:22
by Finn
Syntax Error wrote:
Finn wrote:i think if we are all honest we knew the outcome of this fight before it happened i even nearly covered my small bet with some money on wilder in the 1st but couldnt bring myself to bet against the guy i support.

Maybe Audley should look at having a fairwell fight against someone then at becoming a trainer and seek a world title that way, he's certainly got more to offer in boxing.Incidentally apart from getting his words muddled up and pronouncing fury wrong i thought Wilder came across as very likeable and did what he was expected to do with passion.
I'm not sure a farewell fight for Harrison is wise or warranted.

Farewell fights are for celebrated fighters that have earned it.

Harrison has conned enough money out of boxing & just needs to go away & seek alternative employment, while he still has his faculties & considerable wealth intact.
I think its more for him to go out on a win and to finalise his retirement, Harrison does have fans still.

Re: Spoiler - Audley v Wilder

Posted: 28 Apr 2013, 09:24
by stujones
Watching the fight again - Audely didn't look confident during the stare down, looked like he was head gallows. also the one angle of the kd where you are facing Wilder's back, you can see Audley's eyes looking glazed.

Re: Spoiler - Audley v Wilder

Posted: 28 Apr 2013, 09:27
by Mimmy
I cannot beleive all these people on here saying they knew what the outcome was going to be. There are threads with most saying Fraudley would beat this guy.

Re: Spoiler - Audley v Wilder

Posted: 28 Apr 2013, 09:40
by Finn
mimmy123 wrote:I cannot beleive all these people on here saying they knew what the outcome was going to be. There are threads with most saying Fraudley would beat this guy.
theres a difference saying it and believing it, we've all followed harrisons career.

Re: Spoiler - Audley v Wilder

Posted: 28 Apr 2013, 10:14
by Mimmy
Finn wrote:
mimmy123 wrote:I cannot beleive all these people on here saying they knew what the outcome was going to be. There are threads with most saying Fraudley would beat this guy.
theres a difference saying it and believing it, we've all followed harrisons career.
That means who say it are deluded?

Re: Spoiler - Audley v Wilder

Posted: 28 Apr 2013, 10:28
by spudder56
needs to pack up today and go away with his money and GOOD RIDDANCE

Re: Spoiler - Audley v Wilder

Posted: 28 Apr 2013, 10:38
by Lenny Cravats
A comment from Youtube;

I have no doubt that Audley has the tools to be a good fighter. The problem is that the tools remain in a shed. The shed is locked and Audley doesn't have the key. Also, the shed was broken into and emptied a long time ago. And the shed is located in another continent from Audley. Also, the shed is a metaphor. Audley's career is basically a long-filed police report about some stolen tools that never existed.

Re: Spoiler - Audley v Wilder

Posted: 28 Apr 2013, 10:40
by el_grande_mauro_mina
L.C wrote:A comment from Youtube;

I have no doubt that Audley has the tools to be a good fighter. The problem is that the tools remain in a shed. The shed is locked and Audley doesn't have the key. Also, the shed was broken into and emptied a long time ago. And the shed is located in another continent from Audley. Also, the shed is a metaphor. Audley's career is basically a long-filed police report about some stolen tools that never existed.
:lol:

It is the sort of thing you would write.

Or Datsue! :bow:

Re: Spoiler - Audley v Wilder

Posted: 28 Apr 2013, 12:15
by TheCobra
I'm not sure who is more of a mug, Harrison himself or the people who keep getting sucked in by him. I truly hope we NEVER see him on our screens/shows again in this country. It's time he went away and crawled uner a rock, he brings shame and embarassment on himself and the sport.

Re: Spoiler - Audley v Wilder

Posted: 28 Apr 2013, 13:01
by n1ebf
TheCobra wrote:I truly hope we NEVER see him on our screens/shows again in this country. It's time he went away and crawled uner a rock, he brings shame and embarassment on himself and the sport.
I don't like to agree and sound nasty but it's hard not to. Look at Gary Sykes last night, to pick a name out of thin air, or Khan or Diaz. I know people who've put everything into this game and Audley isn't putting in anything like that. It's only because most people who get to weigh past 15-16 stone have never really exercised, let alone boxed, so you can f*ck about as a Heavyweight and still expect paydays and a shot at getting the sh*t kicked out of you by an actual athlete (Klitschko).....If Mr Harrison was a featherweight, or a welter, bantam, supper-middle.....any other weight, he would have been hardly ever mentioned even on Boxrec.

Re: Spoiler - Audley v Wilder

Posted: 28 Apr 2013, 13:33
by Final round
He surely deserves a another defence of his Prize Fighter title .

Re: Spoiler - Audley v Wilder

Posted: 28 Apr 2013, 13:35
by revporl
From a business point of view, in terms of getting the highest return from a medicore product, he's an absolute genius.

Re: Spoiler - Audley v Wilder

Posted: 28 Apr 2013, 15:58
by crusader
loaded_gloves wrote:Check the boxing rule book, do some research into boxing history, in fact even look into the Douglas/Tyson false 'long count', where the fact that a count is the time it takes the ref to count to 10 and not 10 seconds was one one of the main points that destroyed the Suilaman/King/Tyson axis of evil.
Is the ref supposed to count to ten in a specified amount of time? If not, is there such a thing as a long or quick count?

I think counting to ten implies counting ten seconds, and it's a convention, followed consistently for years across the world, that referees count ten seconds.

Re: Spoiler - Audley v Wilder

Posted: 28 Apr 2013, 16:07
by keithmoonhangover
loaded gloves wrote:Check the boxing rule book, do some research into boxing history.
I checked and you're full of shit.

3.33 If a Boxer is “down” under the provisions of Regulation 3.32.1(a) he must return to the boxing ring unassisted within twenty seconds. In all other cases mentioned above, he must regain his feet unassisted within ten seconds. The Referee shall not permit a Boxer to continue boxing, if in his opinion he is able to do so, until the expiration of 8 seconds following the knock down.

Cue a lack of apology.

Re: Spoiler - Audley v Wilder

Posted: 28 Apr 2013, 16:11
by crusader
Nice find Keith.

And to clarify it wasn't me who posted what you've quoted.

Re: Spoiler - Audley v Wilder

Posted: 28 Apr 2013, 16:13
by keithmoonhangover
crusader wrote:Nice find Keith.

And to clarify it wasn't me who posted what you've quoted.
Sh1t, sorry mate. I'm hopeless with them quote things. :oops:

Or it could just be the wine and codeine. :OhYes:

Re: Spoiler - Audley v Wilder

Posted: 28 Apr 2013, 16:15
by n1ebf
crusader wrote:
loaded_gloves wrote:Check the boxing rule book, do some research into boxing history, in fact even look into the Douglas/Tyson false 'long count', where the fact that a count is the time it takes the ref to count to 10 and not 10 seconds was one one of the main points that destroyed the Suilaman/King/Tyson axis of evil.
Is the ref supposed to count to ten in a specified amount of time? If not, is there such a thing as a long or quick count?

I think counting to ten implies counting ten seconds, and it's a convention, followed consistently for years across the world, that referees count ten seconds.
You have to be ready to fight. Audley wasn't ready to fight before, during or after. How the fck he beat that count I do not know, however, being as he managed to beat it at 9 seconds, when the ref gives you every last chance he can and implores you to walk forward, don't look down and pull your pants up! Audley was about to stand and get smacked sideways again it looked like to me. It's not a criminal offence but he has demonstrated over and over now that he doesn't have the stomach for this game......who is working with this man week in week out, who are his friend within the sport, who is telling him how it is?
You wouldn't get away with this in most gyms in the country where lads are toiling their bollocks off in weight categories with many more decent fighters.

Re: Spoiler - Audley v Wilder

Posted: 29 Apr 2013, 13:33
by keithmoonhangover
keithmoonhangover wrote:
loaded gloves wrote:Check the boxing rule book, do some research into boxing history.
I checked and you're full of poo.

3.33 If a Boxer is “down” under the provisions of Regulation 3.32.1(a) he must return to the boxing ring unassisted within twenty seconds. In all other cases mentioned above, he must regain his feet unassisted within ten seconds. The Referee shall not permit a Boxer to continue boxing, if in his opinion he is able to do so, until the expiration of 8 seconds following the knock down.

Cue a lack of apology.
No comeback loaded gloves?

Re: Spoiler - Audley v Wilder

Posted: 30 Apr 2013, 06:09
by Syntax Error
revporl wrote:From a business point of view, in terms of getting the highest return from a medicore product, he's an absolute genius.
Spot on.

Never has a man who has achieved so little earned so much: he is indeed a genius!

Re: Spoiler - Audley v Wilder

Posted: 30 Apr 2013, 08:12
by forcefraser
Audley is a diamond geezer. REDEMPTION!!!

Watch for Audley to shock the world late 2013. He aims to throw a punch in anger.

Re: Wilder wins in 70 Seconds

Posted: 30 Apr 2013, 12:04
by oliverfennell
Adamj1987 wrote:well done for spoiling it for people
Well done for trying to avoid a British boxing result by going to a boxing website and clicking on the British section.