BoxRec

5-5-1

106-105 simpson.

Big round by either could swing it

I have it 115-113 Choi. Great fight

Choi's last 6-5-1
hats off to 2 very hard men.Good scrap,Dont ever listen to Watt!!!

Good fight, Choi dug really deep and did enough in the last half minute to take the round.
Ultimately though he was not able to keep fighting for 3 minutes a round every round which was the difference 6-5-1 Simpson

116-112, 117-112, 116-113...winner John Simpson.

Fight stats have Choi wide though

The scorecard was a bit wide but was a cracking fight and very close I had choi by one round.

poor form with the belt that!

Fair result, wild scorecards apart from 116-113 though

Ring announcer should be shot ..................... how unprofessional, the new, ligh........ super ....... from errrrrrr ..... errr Scotland

5 rounds is ludicrous.

116-114 simpson

bad scoring

Great fight, I had Choi winning it but don't begrudge Simpson this one - he has had a fair
few he won go against him - a definite match between 'irresistible force vs immovable object'

Fat Git wrote:Great fight, I had Choi winning it but don't begrudge Simpson this one - he has had a fair
few he won go against him - a definite match between 'irresistible force vs immovable object'

X2

macaca wrote:Fair result, wild scorecards apart from 116-113 though

Ring announcer should be shot ..................... how unprofessional, the new, ligh........ super ....... from errrrrrr ..... errr Scotland

Been saying for years that he is pish

sgtcecil wrote:

macaca wrote:Fair result, wild scorecards apart from 116-113 though

Ring announcer should be shot ..................... how unprofessional, the new, ligh........ super ....... from errrrrrr ..... errr Scotland

Been saying for years that he is pish

You don't have a lot to say, the results of a fight announcement doesn't deviate nor does the facts and figures of the fighters or the sanctioning body ............ christ .......... love to see his fee per event, who was it, that guy that used to be on the bill tv show?

macaca wrote:Fair result, wild scorecards apart from 116-113 though

Ring announcer should be shot ..................... how unprofessional, the new, ligh........ super ....... from errrrrrr ..... errr Scotland

Defo. He must have had his ricky burns announcement cards in his hands there.

The MC should be a boxing fan who knows his stuff a mistake like that proves he's just a bit of a Ron burgundy.

Well done Simmo I thought he just done enough

While I think the right guy won, the scoring was verging on scandalous, ESP in light of the punch stats.

ShadrachSimmo wrote:

macaca wrote:Fair result, wild scorecards apart from 116-113 though

Ring announcer should be shot ..................... how unprofessional, the new, ligh........ super ....... from errrrrrr ..... errr Scotland

Defo. He must have had his ricky burns announcement cards in his hands there.

The MC should be a boxing fan who knows his stuff a mistake like that proves he's just a bit of a Ron burgundy.

Well done Simmo I thought he just done enough

There are people on here that would do a perfect job, mistake free and for free ........... not bnovelist

macaca wrote:

sgtcecil wrote:

macaca wrote:Fair result, wild scorecards apart from 116-113 though

Ring announcer should be shot ..................... how unprofessional, the new, ligh........ super ....... from errrrrrr ..... errr Scotland

Been saying for years that he is pish

You don't have a lot to say, the results of a fight announcement doesn't deviate nor does the facts and figures of the fighters or the sanctioning body ............ christ .......... love to see his fee per event, who was it, that guy that used to be on the bill tv show?

I reckon almost everyone on this forum could do better

had Choi winning that one, those cards were hometown alright.

Dave Caldwell seems to be in bed with everyone! Ha

I thought Choi had it by one.

Blimey the Puerto Rican anthem wasn't up to much haha!

Come on Ricky!

desperados wrote:had Choi winning that one, those cards were hometown alright.

The cards were poor. I had simpson by 2. but never 4 and 5 rounds in it!