Re: LHW SEASON WEEK 10 MATCHUPS:
Posted: 02 Jul 2013, 11:19
Patterson will defend his title against Bivins.
This is a good question...how does that work gentleman?DetroitHxC wrote:Gilgamesh was intending on having one of his fighters fight Ketchel this week, before he was a signed fighter.BoxBuzz wrote:Notice that DMA waited until AFTER the Gibbons and Loughran fights could not be made before he offered Ketchel as an options. Smacks of false bravado.
Hmm who approved the Ketchel swap? Was that Crease? If it does not have approval.....I suppose I can rubber stamp this for a small processing fee.
So how does that work, Gil has to find a new opponent, DMA has to fight Gil's fighter, or does Ketchel have two opponents this week?
Fair is fair I guess. Keep Ketchel signed up to his original fight - sorry kevo, next week homeboy.gilgamesh wrote:I still want to fight Ketchel, but I want DMA to control his own fighters fate, if it's all the same to him we can go through with the fight. If he decides to pass on it, we'll take a fight with his throwaway fighter Jack Delaney instead.
Kevo, Allow me to remind you of one simple yet important guideline we have adhered to since the sim first opened.kevo wrote:Motherfuck.
No matriarchal fornication? THAT WASN'T PART OF THE DEAL, BOXBUZZ!!! THAT WASN'T PART OF THE DEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEALLLL!!!!BoxBuzz wrote:Kevo, Allow me to remind you of one simple yet important guideline we have adhered to since the sim first opened.kevo wrote:Motherfuck.
There has never been, nor with there ever be an act of matriarchal fornication performed within this forum, whether simulated or otherwise.
Now...everyone......back to business. Nothing to see here....move along.
Not I sir. That was the first I heard of it too, it seems that DMA is not going through the recognised "due process".BoxBuzz wrote:Hmm who approved the Ketchel swap? Was that Crease?
Obviously, it would be more desirable for the remaining two Champions to fight any of these guys because it wouldn't mean people dropping fights, and things getting messy. But it's up to you gentlemen.Crease wrote:5 Michalczewski - Still unmatched.
6 Spinks - Still unmatched.
7 Moore - Still unmatched.
Loughran is more than willing to take on the top listed opponent at #5. If that fails, #12 and #14 are offered a shot, since next week they will be outside of the top 10, so they can drop the cpu fights and go for their chance now. If those fail, and we are able to (Not sure the ruling), we'll fight Patterson for a unification. If all that fails, we will go from there for a new plan.Crease wrote:UPDATED TITLE NEWS
Okay things are getting confusing on this front... Let's try and make sence of where we are at.
The WBA Champion Tommy Loughran and WBO Champion Floyd Patterson are still looking for title defences this week:
Below is a list of ALL the top-ranked contenders from the start of this week and their current statuses.
5 Michalczewski - Still unmatched.
12 Bivins - agreed to fight Glencoffe Johnson.
14 Johnson - agreed to fight Clinton Woods.
Please Note that BoxBuzz has decided to drop the "coming off a loss" rule for this week.
armageto wrote:Loughran is more than willing to take on the top listed opponent at #5. If that fails, #12 and #14 are offered a shot, since next week they will be outside of the top 10, so they can drop the cpu fights and go for their chance now. If those fail, and we are able to (Not sure the ruling), we'll fight Patterson for a unification. If all that fails, we will go from there for a new plan.Crease wrote:UPDATED TITLE NEWS
Okay things are getting confusing on this front... Let's try and make sence of where we are at.
The WBA Champion Tommy Loughran and WBO Champion Floyd Patterson are still looking for title defences this week:
Below is a list of ALL the top-ranked contenders from the start of this week and their current statuses.
5 Michalczewski - Still unmatched.
12 Bivins - agreed to fight Glencoffe Johnson.
14 Johnson - agreed to fight Clinton Woods.
Please Note that BoxBuzz has decided to drop the "coming off a loss" rule for this week.
armageto wrote:Loughran is more than willing to take on the top listed opponent at #5.
Loughran vs Michalczewski is SIGNED then.DetroitHxC wrote:Loughran vs Michalszewski
Sounds like a plan to me.Crease wrote:armageto wrote:Loughran is more than willing to take on the top listed opponent at #5.Loughran vs Michalczewski is SIGNED then.DetroitHxC wrote:Loughran vs Michalszewski
:??glittermonkey wrote:Don't we usually, you know, wait until the managers involved agree on the fight? Regardless, Dariusz accepts.
But I now realise that it was Mr Detroit - and I thought that Michalczewski that the fight was signed...DetroitHxC wrote:Loughran vs Michalszewski
Patterson vs Spinx
Moore...
OK Foster it isp4p1 wrote:Mills is fine with any match up