BoxRec

Posted: **09 Jul 2013, 08:22**

If Khan fights and beats Alexander I really hope they don't fight Brook.

Posted: **09 Jul 2013, 08:23**

Counter-puncher wrote:i didn't once say anything more than his footwork gives me a swell. no mention at all of Gavin being world class, or otherwise. at least when I nut-hug, I come out and say so. i should have mentioned on that thread, all in all I'd be a little surprised if he did win a full world belt, FWIW.

I think most on here know the flavour of penis I prefer.

Just found it curious that you laugh at the opponents of Kell Brook, but give Frankie 'world class' Gavin a free ride.

Posted: **09 Jul 2013, 08:23**

SNG wrote:If Khan fights and beats Alexander I really hope they don't fight Brook.

Suprises me that, just a fight which doesn't appeal to you?

Posted: **09 Jul 2013, 08:24**

DMA1987 wrote:
Counter-puncher wrote:i didn't once say anything more than his footwork gives me a swell. no mention at all of Gavin being world class, or otherwise. at least when I nut-hug, I come out and say so. i should have mentioned on that thread, all in all I'd be a little surprised if he did win a full world belt, FWIW.
I think most on here know the flavour of penis I prefer.

Just found it curious that you laugh at the opponents of Kell Brook, but give Frankie 'world class' Gavin a free ride.

I imagine it's to do with their different standings, Gavin is fighting at British level, how good do you expect his fights to be?

Posted: **09 Jul 2013, 08:25**

DMA1987 wrote:
Counter-puncher wrote:i didn't once say anything more than his footwork gives me a swell. no mention at all of Gavin being world class, or otherwise. at least when I nut-hug, I come out and say so. i should have mentioned on that thread, all in all I'd be a little surprised if he did win a full world belt, FWIW.
I think most on here know the flavour of penis I prefer.
.

i have no idea whatsoever who you are, so you have the advantage on me there

Posted: **09 Jul 2013, 08:25**

DMA1987 wrote:
Counter-puncher wrote:i didn't once say anything more than his footwork gives me a swell. no mention at all of Gavin being world class, or otherwise. at least when I nut-hug, I come out and say so. i should have mentioned on that thread, all in all I'd be a little surprised if he did win a full world belt, FWIW.
I think most on here know the flavour of penis I prefer.

Just found it curious that you laugh at the opponents of Kell Brook, but give Frankie 'world class' Gavin a free ride.

Never heard you say... do elaborate on that

Posted: **09 Jul 2013, 08:26**

DMA1987 wrote:
SNG wrote:If Khan fights and beats Alexander I really hope they don't fight Brook.
Suprises me that, just a fight which doesn't appeal to you?

I want Brook to fight an actual WW for a title. They've seen Khan as a short cut for ages and I really don't want it to come off for him that way.

Posted: **09 Jul 2013, 08:28**

SNG wrote:
DMA1987 wrote:
SNG wrote:If Khan fights and beats Alexander I really hope they don't fight Brook.
Suprises me that, just a fight which doesn't appeal to you?
I want Brook to fight an actual WW for a title. They've seen Khan as a short cut for ages and I really don't want it to come off for him that way.

X2

Posted: **09 Jul 2013, 08:31**

Counter-puncher wrote:
i have no idea whatsoever who you are, so you have the advantage on me there

Nor should you, the point was I make no secret of who I like, or 'nut hug'.

columbo wrote: Never heard you say... do elaborate on that

;;-)

SNG wrote: I want Brook to fight an actual WW for a title. They've seen Khan as a short cut for ages and I really don't want it to come off for him that way.

If Khan beat Alexander then he wouldn't qualify in that category?

Posted: **09 Jul 2013, 08:36**

Yes, but you know perfectly well what they see in Khan, doesn't a fighter like Brook calling out someone from a lower weight class like Khan over the last few years leave a bad taste in your mouth? Khan has has 8 world title fights and proved he'll go in with the best around, Brook hasn't done anything remotely like that and they clearly see Khan as a shortcut, one I hope he doesn't get.

Posted: **09 Jul 2013, 08:42**

SNG wrote:Yes, but you know perfectly well what they see in Khan, doesn't a fighter like Brook calling out someone from a lower weight class like Khan over the last few years leave a bad taste in your mouth? Khan has has 8 world title fights and proved he'll go in with the best around, Brook hasn't done anything remotely like that and they clearly see Khan as a shortcut, one I hope he doesn't get.

I can't argue at all with your reasoning and I don't think that Kell deserves a bout like that until he has proven himself at that level. It does though resemble the Haye v Fury bout and is driven by economics. It would be a big bout, be a high paying bout for both men and good for British fans.

Posted: **09 Jul 2013, 08:43**

SNG wrote:Yes, but you know perfectly well what they see in Khan, doesn't a fighter like Brook calling out someone from a lower weight class like Khan over the last few years leave a bad taste in your mouth? Khan has has 8 world title fights and proved he'll go in with the best around, Brook hasn't done anything remotely like that and they clearly see Khan as a shortcut, one I hope he doesn't get.

Wasn't it something personal between them which really kicked it all off?

Honestly if Khan loses convincingly to Alexander then I don't think he will be a route to anywhere. It will become a good domestic fight.

I don't want to see Brook fight Khan in expense of a title. I wanted Brook to get in there with Alexander as I thought he would beat him, I still do. But if Khan beats Alexander then the fight vs Brook is nothing but legitimate.

It is also worth me saying that I think Brook has taken an extremely easy route to a title shot, but I don't blame him as much as others do. Not in the same way I would if he was making easy defences.

Posted: **09 Jul 2013, 09:03**

DMA1987 wrote:
SNG wrote:Yes, but you know perfectly well what they see in Khan, doesn't a fighter like Brook calling out someone from a lower weight class like Khan over the last few years leave a bad taste in your mouth? Khan has has 8 world title fights and proved he'll go in with the best around, Brook hasn't done anything remotely like that and they clearly see Khan as a shortcut, one I hope he doesn't get.
Wasn't it something personal between them which really kicked it all off?

.

i *think* it was one of those classic Khan moments where he said something along the lines of 'british fighters (like Kell Brook) using my name...back in the queue...not on my radar/not in my class', when nobody had said a dickybird.

Posted: **09 Jul 2013, 09:52**

There's a lot of piggy backing on known names and loads of ambitious boxers and their mates/camps are guilty of it; with what Khan has accomplished in his career though at a similar age to Brook you can surely imagine that it'd feel like a piss take.

Posted: **09 Jul 2013, 11:44**

kel has been on the pies y his foots been bad the pie man. thats y he cnt make welter,an he did bottle it against alexander to fight carson jones again wat a joke

Posted: **09 Jul 2013, 11:48**

tilt wrote:kel has been on the pies y his foots been bad the pie man. thats y he cnt make welter,an he did bottle it against alexander to fight carson jones again wat a joke

you aren't even a good troll. What happened, did you wake up and get straight back on the sauce?

Counter-puncher wrote:
i *think* it was one of those classic Khan moments where he said something along the lines of 'british fighters (like Kell Brook) using my name...back in the queue...not on my radar/not in my class', when nobody had said a dickybird.

Cheers CP, thought it was something like that.

Posted: **09 Jul 2013, 14:46**

tilt wrote:kel has been on the pies y his foots been bad the pie man. thats y he cnt make welter,an he did bottle it against alexander to fight carson jones again wat a joke

What?

Posted: **09 Jul 2013, 14:54**

There was a period of time when i really did think Brook was the second coming of Naz but he,s in danger of pissing it away,i dont like the way his way his weight fluctuates between fights,never a good sign about a fighters habits between fights,IMO he,s definitly good enough to win a world title but lesser fighters have done it by this stage,Cmon Kell get a move on son

Posted: **09 Jul 2013, 15:26**

Buttered Bagel wrote:
tilt wrote:kel has been on the pies y his foots been bad the pie man. thats y he cnt make welter,an he did bottle it against alexander to fight carson jones again wat a joke
What?

It's like that Fineggans Wake book; it makes (a bit more) sense if you read it aloud.

Posted: **09 Jul 2013, 15:57**

what part of kel brook has been eating to much thats why he cnt make welter dont u understand u freak

Posted: **09 Jul 2013, 16:11**

palooka wrote:[

If Kell can't get down to welter for his foot injury he shouldn't be boxing on this show if he's a proper welter. The fellow is not busy enough by half and from the sounds of it a lot is psychological and motivational - believe me, a lot of people in the every day working world get a lack of motivation for their jobs. I agreed with a post above that doubted the nutritional advice after he sagged v Jones the first bout. His trainer is a fantastic physical specimen but boxers need different muscles and masses than body builders. I hope Brook does not turn up looking ripped and getting gassed and bashed up. Jones was a handful for him last time and I imagine he wants the win.

His trainer always got Johnny and Junior in great shape for their world title fights. But he slung your chum out of the gym so you're still having sly digs years later.

Posted: **09 Jul 2013, 16:20**

tilt wrote:what part of kel brook has been eating to much thats why he cnt make welter dont u understand u freak

Cheers for clarifying

Posted: **09 Jul 2013, 16:34**

Pugilist-specialist wrote:
palooka wrote:[

If Kell can't get down to welter for his foot injury he shouldn't be boxing on this show if he's a proper welter. The fellow is not busy enough by half and from the sounds of it a lot is psychological and motivational - believe me, a lot of people in the every day working world get a lack of motivation for their jobs. I agreed with a post above that doubted the nutritional advice after he sagged v Jones the first bout. His trainer is a fantastic physical specimen but boxers need different muscles and masses than body builders. I hope Brook does not turn up looking ripped and getting gassed and bashed up. Jones was a handful for him last time and I imagine he wants the win.
His trainer always got Johnny and Junior in great shape for their world title fights. But he slung your chum out of the gym so you're still having sly digs years later.

I can't see your problem at all specialist; read the post and what I was responding to

Posted: **09 Jul 2013, 16:37**

palooka wrote:
Pugilist-specialist wrote:
palooka wrote:[

If Kell can't get down to welter for his foot injury he shouldn't be boxing on this show if he's a proper welter. The fellow is not busy enough by half and from the sounds of it a lot is psychological and motivational - believe me, a lot of people in the every day working world get a lack of motivation for their jobs. I agreed with a post above that doubted the nutritional advice after he sagged v Jones the first bout. His trainer is a fantastic physical specimen but boxers need different muscles and masses than body builders. I hope Brook does not turn up looking ripped and getting gassed and bashed up. Jones was a handful for him last time and I imagine he wants the win.
His trainer always got Johnny and Junior in great shape for their world title fights. But he slung your chum out of the gym so you're still having sly digs years later.

I can't see your problem at all specialist; read the post and what I was responding to

You cant kicked out his gym mate?

Posted: **09 Jul 2013, 16:38**

palooka wrote:
Buttered Bagel wrote:
tilt wrote:kel has been on the pies y his foots been bad the pie man. thats y he cnt make welter,an he did bottle it against alexander to fight carson jones again wat a joke
What?
It's like that Fineggans Wake book; it makes (a bit more) sense if you read it aloud.

Nonsense

BoxRec

Brook/Jones - Distance?

Re: Brook/Jones - Distance?

Re: Brook/Jones - Distance?

Re: Brook/Jones - Distance?

Re: Brook/Jones - Distance?

Re: Brook/Jones - Distance?

Re: Brook/Jones - Distance?

Re: Brook/Jones - Distance?

Re: Brook/Jones - Distance?

Re: Brook/Jones - Distance?

Re: Brook/Jones - Distance?

Re: Brook/Jones - Distance?

Re: Brook/Jones - Distance?

Re: Brook/Jones - Distance?

Re: Brook/Jones - Distance?

Re: Brook/Jones - Distance?

Re: Brook/Jones - Distance?

Re: Brook/Jones - Distance?

Re: Brook/Jones - Distance?

Re: Brook/Jones - Distance?

Re: Brook/Jones - Distance?

Re: Brook/Jones - Distance?

Re: Brook/Jones - Distance?

Re: Brook/Jones - Distance?

Re: Brook/Jones - Distance?

Re: Brook/Jones - Distance?