BoxRec

Trojans44 wrote:

desperados wrote:

Trojans44 wrote:I've got a question:

'Ricky why did you reject possibly the only opportunity you'll ever get to box at the highest level and then serious expect me to pay £80 to watch you get completely dominated by a Puerto rican novice?'

I recognise this is a bit a harsh. But those are my views.

By 'a Puerto Rican novice' did you mean 'an unbeaten, 22&0 switch hitter'? By 'get completely dominated' did you mean 'stop'? By 'this is a bit harsh' did you mean 'i'm an idiot' ?

Sorry have you seen the guys record? Its a joke for world title challenger. The fact he turned out to be a bit handy is neither here nor there. He is a novice. Dan Rafael agrees.

And yes he was completely dominated. Utterly dominated. He won the lottery that this was guy was in the 2% of fighters who would quit in that position.

Lastly, Burns is the living definition of a ducker. He refused multiple opportunities to fight on the biggest stage and prove he's the best. Imagine Gonzalez didn't quit - how would that decision be looking now?

]


By 'a Puerto Rican novice' did you mean 'an unbeaten, 22&0 switch hitter'? By 'get completely dominated' did you mean 'stop'? By 'this is a bit harsh' did you mean 'i'm an idiot' ?[/quote]

Sorry have you seen the guys record? Its a joke for world title challenger. The fact he turned out to be a bit handy is neither here nor there. He is a novice. Dan Rafael agrees.

And yes he was completely dominated. Utterly dominated. He won the lottery that this was guy was in the 2% of fighters who would quit in that position.

Lastly, Burns is the living definition of a ducker. He refused multiple opportunities to fight on the biggest stage and prove he's the best. Imagine Gonzalez didn't quit - how would that decision be looking now?[/quote]
Dan Rafael talks complete shite on a constant basis, I won't give the rest of the post justification with an answer.[/quote]


I suggest thats probably because you are unable to engage with the three points made in a way that shows they are wrong. This is fairly normal with statements of fact rather than opinion.