Re: Mike Tyson vs Lennox Lewis in their primes
Posted: 22 Aug 2013, 15:31
But when Tyson said that he could have been referring to "in this time frame" from when they fought. Like no version of himself would have beaten Lennox in 2002. The sentence is some what vagueHomicideHenry wrote:Ironically, this board believes Tyson would have beaten Lewis despite Tyson having said that. Yet, they use a similar statement as 'evidence' that James Jeffries could never of beaten Jack Johnson. And to a smaller degree, people use it as 'evidence' that Marciano would always beat Louis.montrealsuper wrote:Gotta favor Lewis. Tyson himself said after he lost to Lewis, "I could never beat this guy, he's just too big and too strong."
But maybe Tyson himself even forgets just how amazingly great he was back in 86-88.
Just kinda feel Lewis had the size and smarts and strength to outbox and control young Mike, Tyson even in his prime had some trouble with big tall smart boxers like Tillis and Tucker and Lewis was far better than those two.
Lewis WI2
For me, the first round shows me that at Tyson's best, Lewis would have been kayoed. The fact that Tyson was out of shape, no longer had any desire for the business and was broke, shows that even that version made Lewis's eyes glaze over in that first round. Then again, maybe I am downplaying the resolve of Lennox Lewis to come back after facing adversity. However, at the end of the day, the greatest victory he ever had was over an old, shadow that was once Mike Tyson.
Jesus bless.