BoxRec

According to Frankie's tweets his opponent for 21st September is announced tomorrow (Wednesday 14th). We shall see.....

can't wait....if his promoter could offer 100k for opponent it should be somebody genuine world class...

Colin Lynes maybe or Matthew Hatton are probably the most realistic,logical opponents i can think of top of my head or maybe Ajose Olusegun

los2 wrote:can't wait....if his promoter could offer 100k for opponent it should be somebody genuine world class...

When did anyone say Warren was going to pay £100,000 for the opponent? I doubt Frankie's getting half of that.

expe wrote:

los2 wrote:can't wait....if his promoter could offer 100k for opponent it should be somebody genuine world class...

When did anyone say Warren was going to pay £100,000 for the opponent? I doubt Frankie's getting half of that.

50k Dont be silly.....................

expe wrote:

los2 wrote:can't wait....if his promoter could offer 100k for opponent it should be somebody genuine world class...

When did anyone say Warren was going to pay £100,000 for the opponent? I doubt Frankie's getting half of that.

http://www.boxingnewsonline.net/latest/ ... ank-warren

funnily enough this only came out after news that brook was boxing senchenko .....still 100k on the table for frankie's opponent....can't wait to see who it is.....

Londonirish wrote:

expe wrote:

los2 wrote:can't wait....if his promoter could offer 100k for opponent it should be somebody genuine world class...

When did anyone say Warren was going to pay £100,000 for the opponent? I doubt Frankie's getting half of that.

50k Dont be silly.....................

I meant less than half.

los2 wrote:

expe wrote:

los2 wrote:can't wait....if his promoter could offer 100k for opponent it should be somebody genuine world class...

When did anyone say Warren was going to pay £100,000 for the opponent? I doubt Frankie's getting half of that.

http://www.boxingnewsonline.net/latest/ ... ank-warren

funnily enough this only came out after news that brook was boxing senchenko .....still 100k on the table for frankie's opponent....can't wait to see who it is.....

You really think that offer was genuine? This is a domestic opponent, so Frankie can win the Lonsdale outright, he's being moved well, there's no need to rush him.

los2 wrote:can't wait....if his promoter could offer 100k for opponent it should be somebody genuine world class...

He wants nobody close to genuine world class.

DMA1987 wrote:

los2 wrote:can't wait....if his promoter could offer 100k for opponent it should be somebody genuine world class...

He wants nobody close to genuine world class.

Like I said, there's no need to rush, win the Lonsdale outright then go for the European in December. Gavin should be moving to world level sometime around the back end of next year.

DMA1987 wrote:

los2 wrote:can't wait....if his promoter could offer 100k for opponent it should be somebody genuine world class...

He wants nobody close to genuine world class.

Like I said, there's no need to rush, win the Lonsdale outright then go for the European in December. Gavin should be moving to world level sometime around the back end of next year.

los2 wrote:

expe wrote:

los2 wrote:can't wait....if his promoter could offer 100k for opponent it should be somebody genuine world class...

When did anyone say Warren was going to pay £100,000 for the opponent? I doubt Frankie's getting half of that.

http://www.boxingnewsonline.net/latest/ ... ank-warren

funnily enough this only came out after news that brook was boxing senchenko .....still 100k on the table for frankie's opponent....can't wait to see who it is.....

You are just been argumentative. There probably is 100,000 on the table for Brook, but nobody else(except Khan!). If Haye pulled out tomorrow, does that mean there is 5million on the table for anyone to box Fury, like a Sprott or Towers or so? Stop twisting things...

Londonirish wrote:

expe wrote:

los2 wrote:can't wait....if his promoter could offer 100k for opponent it should be somebody genuine world class...

When did anyone say Warren was going to pay £100,000 for the opponent? I doubt Frankie's getting half of that.

50k Dont be silly.....................

He's got to be doing 30 hasn't he Martin? Signed a big contract when he went over, I heard he got ten for his debut. Unless it got rewritten when he went through his bad patch and messed people about a bit.

mickey1975 wrote:

You are just been argumentative. There probably is 100,000 on the table for Brook, but nobody else(except Khan!). If Haye pulled out tomorrow, does that mean there is 5million on the table for anyone to box Fury, like a Sprott or Towers or so? Stop twisting things...

if there was 100k on the table for brook why wait until after the senchenko fight is announced to declare it?.....

http://www.allegedly.com/news/frank-w ... 08-13.html

in his latest column he claims senchenko is on a six-figure purse and that hearn should have brought a world champion over for that purse....he's got 100k for frankie's opponent so is he bringing a world champ over? ......can't wait for the opponent to be announced.......

los2 wrote:

mickey1975 wrote:

You are just been argumentative. There probably is 100,000 on the table for Brook, but nobody else(except Khan!). If Haye pulled out tomorrow, does that mean there is 5million on the table for anyone to box Fury, like a Sprott or Towers or so? Stop twisting things...

if there was 100k on the table for brook why wait until after the senchenko fight is announced to declare it?.....

http://www.allegedly.com/news/frank-w ... 08-13.html

in his latest column he claims senchenko is on a six-figure purse and that hearn should have brought a world champion over for that purse....he's got 100k for frankie's opponent so is he bringing a world champ over? ......can't wait for the opponent to be announced.......

So if he fought Brook it would have been on the undercard at the Copperbox? Different fight, different circumstances, as I guess you know, unless you are a bit slow...Definitely 100,000+ for Brook or the like at the NEC or somewhere for a decent title. Sept 21st is all about keeping busy and winning the Lonsdale belt outright. Would you like me to run through this again for you mate?

mickey1975 wrote:

los2 wrote:

mickey1975 wrote:

You are just been argumentative. There probably is 100,000 on the table for Brook, but nobody else(except Khan!). If Haye pulled out tomorrow, does that mean there is 5million on the table for anyone to box Fury, like a Sprott or Towers or so? Stop twisting things...

if there was 100k on the table for brook why wait until after the senchenko fight is announced to declare it?.....

http://www.allegedly.com/news/frank-w ... 08-13.html

in his latest column he claims senchenko is on a six-figure purse and that hearn should have brought a world champion over for that purse....he's got 100k for frankie's opponent so is he bringing a world champ over? ......can't wait for the opponent to be announced.......

So if he fought Brook it would have been on the undercard at the Copperbox? Different fight, different circumstances, as I guess you know, unless you are a bit slow...Definitely 100,000+ for Brook or the like at the NEC or somewhere for a decent title. Sept 21st is all about keeping busy and winning the Lonsdale belt outright. Would you like me to run through this again for you mate?

so you think frankie's opponent will get 100k for the fight after this one....ok pal...... .....we'll see....

When its a fight of the calibre of Brook, then yes, of course. Don't know when it will be though. I would put him in with Kell tomorrow.

David Barnes

los2 wrote:
if there was 100k on the table for brook why wait until after the senchenko fight is announced to declare it?.....

http://www.allegedly.com/news/frank-w ... 08-13.html

in his latest column he claims senchenko is on a six-figure purse and that hearn should have brought a world champion over for that purse....he's got 100k for frankie's opponent so is he bringing a world champ over? ......can't wait for the opponent to be announced.......

I can imagine why.

DMA1987 wrote:

los2 wrote:
if there was 100k on the table for brook why wait until after the senchenko fight is announced to declare it?.....

http://www.allegedly.com/news/frank-w ... 08-13.html

in his latest column he claims senchenko is on a six-figure purse and that hearn should have brought a world champion over for that purse....he's got 100k for frankie's opponent so is he bringing a world champ over? ......can't wait for the opponent to be announced.......

I can imagine why.

You're too young to be so cynical

palooka wrote:

DMA1987 wrote:

los2 wrote:
if there was 100k on the table for brook why wait until after the senchenko fight is announced to declare it?.....

http://www.allegedly.com/news/frank-w ... 08-13.html

in his latest column he claims senchenko is on a six-figure purse and that hearn should have brought a world champion over for that purse....he's got 100k for frankie's opponent so is he bringing a world champ over? ......can't wait for the opponent to be announced.......

I can imagine why.

You're too young to be so cynical

I'm such a happy chappy. But when FW gets mentioned a dark cloud forms above me.

David Barnes

James Harte wrote:David Barnes

Would have still been a pretty easy fight 3 years ago, now its not even acceptable, sorry but it just isn't.

DMA1987 wrote:

James Harte wrote:David Barnes

Would have still been a pretty easy fight 3 years ago, now its not even acceptable, sorry but it just isn't.

Twice British champion, admittedly a few years ago, with 1 proper defeat, who else could they have brought in?

expe wrote:

DMA1987 wrote:

James Harte wrote:David Barnes

Would have still been a pretty easy fight 3 years ago, now its not even acceptable, sorry but it just isn't.

Twice British champion, admittedly a few years ago, with 1 proper defeat, who else could they have brought in?

Really? Barnes is not match fit for this sort of bout, may as well get James Hare.