Page 3 of 4

Re: Intimidating and non-intimidating boxers

Posted: 04 Sep 2013, 05:50
by G-man
Image

Re: Intimidating and non-intimidating boxers

Posted: 04 Sep 2013, 06:22
by banjo
You can be as big as you want, be covered in scars and tattoos but to me it's the eyes, the eyes give away a lot, you can tell if somebody is meek, strong or a complete psychopath just by looking at their eyes.

Re: Intimidating and non-intimidating boxers

Posted: 04 Sep 2013, 08:13
by bripez
It seems to me that even just walking down the street, everybody seems to think that they are some kind of hard case.

This hasn't been helped by the Grant Mitchel effect.

10 years ago there were plenty of middle aged fat bald blokes about, but these days it seems that every fat bald bloke thinks that he is some kind of hard nut (especially if they have tattoos and/or a hard looking dog such as a staffie (often named Tyson or Rocky or something)).

Re: Intimidating and non-intimidating boxers

Posted: 04 Sep 2013, 08:21
by Jeff Thomas
They often wear tap out shirts

Re: Intimidating and non-intimidating boxers

Posted: 04 Sep 2013, 08:57
by macaca
Darren Barker for me looks nothing like a boxer when in regular clothes on the street

Re: Intimidating and non-intimidating boxers

Posted: 04 Sep 2013, 09:03
by orbtastic
I'm sure Tyson had many sleepness nights about being wrapped in a cocoon of horror.

Re: Intimidating and non-intimidating boxers

Posted: 04 Sep 2013, 09:09
by palooka
orbtastic wrote:I'm sure Tyson had many sleepness nights about being wrapped in a cocoon of horror.
Yea, when he was off his head on drugs

Re: Intimidating and non-intimidating boxers

Posted: 04 Sep 2013, 09:19
by Jeff Thomas
Dead Mouse wrote:
bripez wrote:It seems to me that even just walking down the street, everybody seems to think that they are some kind of hard case.

This hasn't been helped by the Grant Mitchel effect.

10 years ago there were plenty of middle aged fat bald blokes about, but these days it seems that every fat bald bloke thinks that he is some kind of hard nut (especially if they have tattoos and/or a hard looking dog such as a staffie (often named Tyson or Rocky or something)).
I have a staff crossbreed, they’re not 'hard looking' in the slightest. People place the negative connotations usually reserved for pit bulls on them. The reality is that, if raised correctly, you won’t find a gentler dog, although they are aggressive if someone approaches you in an aggressive way or tries it on.
I love staffies it's a shame chavs have adopted them as their pedigree chums

Re: Intimidating and non-intimidating boxers

Posted: 04 Sep 2013, 09:48
by palooka
Jeff Thomas wrote:
Dead Mouse wrote:
bripez wrote:It seems to me that even just walking down the street, everybody seems to think that they are some kind of hard case.

This hasn't been helped by the Grant Mitchel effect.

10 years ago there were plenty of middle aged fat bald blokes about, but these days it seems that every fat bald bloke thinks that he is some kind of hard nut (especially if they have tattoos and/or a hard looking dog such as a staffie (often named Tyson or Rocky or something)).
I have a staff crossbreed, they’re not 'hard looking' in the slightest. People place the negative connotations usually reserved for pit bulls on them. The reality is that, if raised correctly, you won’t find a gentler dog, although they are aggressive if someone approaches you in an aggressive way or tries it on.
I love staffies it's a shame chavs have adopted them as their pedigree chums


That's a phenomenon at least 20 years old.

Re: Intimidating and non-intimidating boxers

Posted: 04 Sep 2013, 10:17
by n1ebf
macaca wrote:Darren Barker for me looks nothing like a boxer when in regular clothes on the street
I was surprised when Barker got done in by those hooligans. There were a few of them but I thought he'd have been all over them.
I wouldn't fancy a jab in the face off him.

Re: Intimidating and non-intimidating boxers

Posted: 04 Sep 2013, 10:38
by orbtastic
mercman wrote:
MachoMan09 wrote:
bripez wrote:It seems to me that even just walking down the street, everybody seems to think that they are some kind of hard case.
Do they think that? Or are they putting on a front because lots of other people are putting on a front too?
It could be either, but I do get the impression nowadays that more and more ordinary blokes are 'larging it', acting hard or whatever else you want to call it. It's bloody ridiculous really because most of them can't fight and haven't got a lot of bottle unless they've got loads of back up.
Yeah but the flip of that is all the metrosexuals and hipsters who are too busy looking at themselves in shop windows to think about anything else.

Re: Intimidating and non-intimidating boxers

Posted: 04 Sep 2013, 11:00
by palooka
mercman wrote:Always had those those though, just called different things. Amongst other less polite names, I remember them being described as 'posers' back in the day.
There are a few hard posers.

Re: Intimidating and non-intimidating boxers

Posted: 04 Sep 2013, 11:32
by Jeff Thomas
NorthEastBoxingFan wrote:
macaca wrote:Darren Barker for me looks nothing like a boxer when in regular clothes on the street
I was surprised when Barker got done in by those hooligans. There were a few of them but I thought he'd have been all over them.
I wouldn't fancy a jab in the face off him.
One on one probably even pissed course the chances are they'd get a shoeing but often fights involving groups tend to be resolved by a guy getting punched in the back of his head when he's not expecting it. Always be first. Walk away if you can - but if you can't be first.

Re: Intimidating and non-intimidating boxers

Posted: 04 Sep 2013, 11:41
by palooka
Easiest thing is don't knock about with people who like trouble and don't go to pubs where trouble happens every week, if you're pretty sober you can 'smell' trouble brewing.

Re: Intimidating and non-intimidating boxers

Posted: 04 Sep 2013, 12:05
by Anzi
MachoMan09 wrote:
bripez wrote:It seems to me that even just walking down the street, everybody seems to think that they are some kind of hard case.
Do they think that? Or are they putting on a front because lots of other people are putting on a front too?
I agree, like people who call themselves hard sounding names.

Re: Intimidating and non-intimidating boxers

Posted: 04 Sep 2013, 12:07
by Anzi
MachoMan09 wrote:
bripez wrote:It seems to me that even just walking down the street, everybody seems to think that they are some kind of hard case.
Do they think that? Or are they putting on a front because lots of other people are putting on a front too?
I agree, like people who call themselves hard sounding names.

Re: Intimidating and non-intimidating boxers

Posted: 04 Sep 2013, 12:19
by n1ebf
Jeff Thomas wrote:
NorthEastBoxingFan wrote:
macaca wrote:Darren Barker for me looks nothing like a boxer when in regular clothes on the street
I was surprised when Barker got done in by those hooligans. There were a few of them but I thought he'd have been all over them.
I wouldn't fancy a jab in the face off him.
One on one probably even pissed course the chances are they'd get a shoeing but often fights involving groups tend to be resolved by a guy getting punched in the back of his head when he's not expecting it. Always be first. Walk away if you can - but if you can't be first.

I hit a kid at school once. I was up against a wall and he had back up, loads of it. The others parted like the red sea. I did feel bad though later.......well, I felt very good for a few days......but a few weeks after he was on my street and we were playing. I felt a right c*nt. :(
Always been pretty mindful about letting it go after that......which means if ever bother happens, which it very rarely does with me, I'm almost immediately on the back foot cos I won't crack somebody unless they're going for me - which ain't very fair when you think about it!

Re: Intimidating and non-intimidating boxers

Posted: 04 Sep 2013, 12:27
by expe
NorthEastBoxingFan wrote:
Jeff Thomas wrote:
NorthEastBoxingFan wrote:
I was surprised when Barker got done in by those hooligans. There were a few of them but I thought he'd have been all over them.
I wouldn't fancy a jab in the face off him.
One on one probably even pissed course the chances are they'd get a shoeing but often fights involving groups tend to be resolved by a guy getting punched in the back of his head when he's not expecting it. Always be first. Walk away if you can - but if you can't be first.

I hit a kid at school once. I was up against a wall and he had back up, loads of it. The others parted like the red sea. I did feel bad though later.......well, I felt very good for a few days......but a few weeks after he was on my street and we were playing. I felt a right c*nt. :(
Always been pretty mindful about letting it go after that......which means if ever bother happens, which it very rarely does with me, I'm almost immediately on the back foot cos I won't crack somebody unless they're going for me - which ain't very fair when you think about it!
I can remember 2 fights at school, one with a mate, one with another mate in his house and there was the one 10 minutes into the school trip abroad, if I'm honest 3 of those were started in some way by me and I threw the first punch in 3. In 2 of them I have no memory of being hit with a punch or even having one thrown at me and in one of the others I don't think he threw a proper punch either. I can only remember being hit once in all 4. I always tell myself I won't throw the first punch, but I can't help myself and start throwing punches.

Re: Intimidating and non-intimidating boxers

Posted: 04 Sep 2013, 12:54
by Teddy's Toupee
macaca wrote:Darren Barker for me looks nothing like a boxer when in regular clothes on the street
He does looks like the ne'er-do-well cartoon character Butt-Head, though.

Re: Intimidating and non-intimidating boxers

Posted: 04 Sep 2013, 13:05
by palooka
Richie Evatt always looked an intimidating sort while Georgie Smith (who could box and hit) did not.

Re: Intimidating and non-intimidating boxers

Posted: 04 Sep 2013, 17:00
by Monte Fisto
Menacing and plenty capable of making u shit in your sock:
Tyson
Margarito
Foreman in his hay
Larry O on a local level. Remember seing him on his debut. The whole of york hall were in shock as he walked into the ring. Utter unit
Maidana
Hagler
Duran
Tua
Samuel peters
Vlad
Kimbo slice. Lol

Re: Intimidating and non-intimidating boxers

Posted: 04 Sep 2013, 17:20
by banjo
bripez wrote:It seems to me that even just walking down the street, everybody seems to think that they are some kind of hard case.

This hasn't been helped by the Grant Mitchel effect.

10 years ago there were plenty of middle aged fat bald blokes about, but these days it seems that every fat bald bloke thinks that he is some kind of hard nut (especially if they have tattoos and/or a hard looking dog such as a staffie (often named Tyson or Rocky or something)).
Oi! I'm bald(not middle aged or fat) have tattoos and a couple of rottweilers and I don't think I'm hard, more like Hell on Earth. :evil:

Re: Intimidating and non-intimidating boxers

Posted: 04 Sep 2013, 20:18
by ajwesty13
Valuev made me shudder bit just by his sheer size


but the least scary are the guys when in the gym who run on the treadmill throwing combinations in their tapout tshirts

Re: Intimidating and non-intimidating boxers

Posted: 05 Sep 2013, 09:36
by Anzi
Macho : Ha Ha "Young Man " " In the Navy"

Re: Intimidating and non-intimidating boxers

Posted: 05 Sep 2013, 10:03
by IRLangmaid25
I remember when the Calzaghe-Mikkel Kessler fight was announced I found Kessler quite scary with his tattoos but when I watched an interview I could not think what a gentleman he is. I think Ricky Burns comes over quite well as well. As for scary I think Miguel Cotto is quite intense.