Page 3 of 3
Re: Groves v froch not happening
Posted: 24 Jan 2014, 10:53
by mickey1975
Parson Cross wrote:Oh you'd be shocked at Groves own value of himself mate.
After being "brought up" by Haye and Booth, I wouldn't.
Re: Groves v froch not happening
Posted: 24 Jan 2014, 11:02
by ScottDetonator
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/boxing/25883588
Here we go... Anyone feel like we are having our plonkers pulled here?
Re: Groves v froch not happening
Posted: 24 Jan 2014, 11:08
by TopGun
This is poor from Geogre to turn down 7 figure purse
Re: Groves v froch not happening
Posted: 24 Jan 2014, 11:15
by gazzman87
If Froch fights Chavez it's win win. If he loses the Groves fight is still on.
If he loses with Groves the Chavez fight is off.
Wants to pick up two paycheck's can't blame him can you?
Re: Groves v froch not happening
Posted: 24 Jan 2014, 11:22
by ScottDetonator
Groves possibly wants £2 million to cover the frustration he will have for the rest of his career after losing twice to Froch.
Insane he should turn down a million+ though, how many world titles are fought for across the globe for a hell of a lot less? The kid needs a reality check.
Re: Groves v froch not happening
Posted: 24 Jan 2014, 11:24
by Parson Cross
And so it begins .........
Done deal by mid February.
Re: Groves v froch not happening
Posted: 24 Jan 2014, 11:28
by Parson Cross
Just to clarify just because it says 7 figure sum does not mean the offer was just 1 million.
Re: Groves v froch not happening
Posted: 24 Jan 2014, 11:34
by earsjohn
Parson Cross wrote:Just to clarify just because it says 7 figure sum does not mean the offer was just 1 million.
But it's the view of one party in a two-party negotiation; how can it be anything other than the complete, 100% accurate, entire story?
Re: Groves v froch not happening
Posted: 24 Jan 2014, 12:07
by Parson Cross
Spit it out.
Are you saying you don't believe a 7 figure offer has been made ?
Re: Groves v froch not happening
Posted: 24 Jan 2014, 12:20
by Crazyboy
Parson Cross wrote:Just to clarify just because it says 7 figure sum does not mean the offer was just 1 million.
Absolutely, good point
Re: Groves v froch not happening
Posted: 24 Jan 2014, 12:40
by earsjohn
Parson Cross wrote:Spit it out.
Are you saying you don't believe a 7 figure offer has been made ?
I would guess that a 7 figure offer has been made, but there will likely be a number of add-ons, caveats, qualifications and riders. And therefore, I don't believe that Groves has turned down a straight-cash £1m+ offer (which is what the story/Team Froch would like us to think).
Re: Groves v froch not happening
Posted: 24 Jan 2014, 13:01
by lillywhite14
To be honest, I think 500k is a good offer, if he has turned down a mill then he is deluded.
If he don't fight Carl he will do well to earn a tenth of that for his next fight!
Re: Groves v froch not happening
Posted: 24 Jan 2014, 13:02
by orbtastic
Presumably there is an options/rematch clause in that offer, it's just good business sense...but it does mean there is more to it than a 7 figure offer.
Anyway, I'm not entirely sure how a mandated IBF fight alters this, as it doesn't go to purse bids, does it? Or does it? I thought that only happened for vacant title fights but seem to recall Wlad/Povetkin went to purse bids as it was mandated.
Or Froch could just vacate, obviously.