Conquest vs Mckenzie RBR
Re: Conquest vs Mckenzie RBR
Khomitsky is a tough mofo.
-
jameswilson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13502
- Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01
Re: Conquest vs Mckenzie RBR
To be honest Buglioni should (and usually is) several fights down the card. I say it all the time but beneath the top 3 or 4 fights on a televised card you are going to get these guys in their learning fights.rossij8 wrote:I mean in reverse towards the home fighter - most of the time they are home shut outsjameswilson wrote:Getting KO'd after losing most of the rounds is competitive is it?rossij8 wrote:its good to see competitive fights - sorry for both Fwanks though
Maybe there was a bit of pressure to step him up a bit too quick, as columbo said, and it has backfired.
Re: Conquest vs Mckenzie RBR
I wonder if that fight would of been made if Dean Powell was still here.jameswilson wrote:To be honest Buglioni should (and usually is) several fights down the card. I say it all the time but beneath the top 3 or 4 fights on a televised card you are going to get these guys in their learning fights.rossij8 wrote:I mean in reverse towards the home fighter - most of the time they are home shut outsjameswilson wrote:
Getting KO'd after losing most of the rounds is competitive is it?
Maybe there was a bit of pressure to step him up a bit too quick, as columbo said, and it has backfired.
Re: Conquest vs Mckenzie RBR
Khomitsky is a beast.
Bet Eddie wouldn't put him near Callum Smith anytime soon. Though I would be interested to see how that would turn out

Bet Eddie wouldn't put him near Callum Smith anytime soon. Though I would be interested to see how that would turn out
Re: Conquest vs Mckenzie RBR
They were mainly hyped as a result of selling lots of tickets, wasn't really like anyone had truly bought into it and thought they were world beaters. You can't say their popularity was undeserved either, what does a fighter have to do to deserve popularity? They sell lots of tickets, most likely because they're probably sound lads who are a good laugh to be around and as time goes on, more and more people start coming along, it's not really a reflection of ability, loads of very average fighters have been very popular, Arturo Gatti being a good example, then there's fighters like Rigondeaux who have more talent in their little toe, but he's not great to watch if you're not a purist, so he's not a big draw.Boxing Prospect wrote:It's good to see over-hyped guys exposed, it may now actually be a case of putting on more good match ups to sell shows rather than relying on 2 guys with undeserved popularity.expe wrote:Why would it be good to see them lose? The Copperbox shows are decent and they keep fighters active, why would anyone want to see less shows put on domestically?Boxing Prospect wrote:Be great to see Franks 2 ticket sellers lose on the same show! Bye bye Copperbox shows!
Re: Conquest vs Mckenzie RBR
I think Smith would deal with him. Probably a points win but i'd fancy him in that fight.Naandrew wrote:Khomitsky is a beast.
Bet Eddie wouldn't put him near Callum Smith anytime soon. Though I would be interested to see how that would turn out![]()
Re: Conquest vs Mckenzie RBR
From a boxing POV, it's nights like these that the professonal void left by the death of Dean Powell are most noticeable. They had a matchmakng 'mare tonight.
Re: Conquest vs Mckenzie RBR
Have to admit I would enjoy Eubank Jr getting beat now.
He just said Kerry Hope pulled out for no particular reason.... just like he ducked Nick Blackwell for no particular reason.
He just said Kerry Hope pulled out for no particular reason.... just like he ducked Nick Blackwell for no particular reason.
Re: Conquest vs Mckenzie RBR
Yeah was just saying that mate.Sklar wrote:From a boxing POV, it's nights like these that the professonal void left by the death of Dean Powell are most noticeable. They had a matchmakng 'mare tonight.
Re: Conquest vs Mckenzie RBR
Possibly not, it looked a dangerous one on paper and it certainly proved to be so. Buglioni would probably have been better off going in with someone like Cello Renda or Jahmaine Smyle.columbo wrote:I wonder if that fight would of been made if Dean Powell was still here.jameswilson wrote:To be honest Buglioni should (and usually is) several fights down the card. I say it all the time but beneath the top 3 or 4 fights on a televised card you are going to get these guys in their learning fights.rossij8 wrote:
I mean in reverse towards the home fighter - most of the time they are home shut outs
Maybe there was a bit of pressure to step him up a bit too quick, as columbo said, and it has backfired.
-
jameswilson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13502
- Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01
Re: Conquest vs Mckenzie RBR
At least it's a packed house.......Sklar wrote:From a boxing POV, it's nights like these that the professonal void left by the death of Dean Powell are most noticeable. They had a matchmakng 'mare tonight.
Re: Conquest vs Mckenzie RBR
Hope got cut in his last fight 3 weeks ago. And Danny Butler and Billy Joe Saunders and Gary O'Sullivan, the list of names on that list is endless.Naandrew wrote:Have to admit I would enjoy Eubank Jr getting beat now.
He just said Kerry Hope pulled out for no particular reason.... just like he ducked Nick Blackwell for no particular reason.
Re: Conquest vs Mckenzie RBR
But will it be next tme?jameswilson wrote:At least it's a packed house.......Sklar wrote:From a boxing POV, it's nights like these that the professonal void left by the death of Dean Powell are most noticeable. They had a matchmakng 'mare tonight.
-
jameswilson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13502
- Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01
Re: Conquest vs Mckenzie RBR
I dont think it was classy of Eubank to be posturing when the guy was laying completely outcold.
-
jameswilson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13502
- Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01
Re: Conquest vs Mckenzie RBR
He was wanting to copy his Dad vs Reginaldo Dos Santos.columbo wrote:I dont think it was classy of Eubank to be posturing when the guy was laying completely outcold.
Re: Conquest vs Mckenzie RBR
We already knew he was a twat, like he always says, it's in the DNA, but this was just 100% confirmation for anyone who was doubting it.columbo wrote:I dont think it was classy of Eubank to be posturing when the guy was laying completely outcold.
Re: Conquest vs Mckenzie RBR
He's trying to be his dad. He should be his own man.jameswilson wrote:He was wanting to copy his Dad vs Reginaldo Dos Santos.columbo wrote:I dont think it was classy of Eubank to be posturing when the guy was laying completely outcold.
-
ShadrachSimmo
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 4738
- Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 05:42
Re: Conquest vs Mckenzie RBR
The guys an embarrassing parody of his dad.columbo wrote:I dont think it was classy of Eubank to be posturing when the guy was laying completely outcold.
A fight with someone like Saunders or Ryder etc just won't happen anytime soon.
He needs to step up and fast.
Re: Conquest vs Mckenzie RBR
The fight with BJS interests me I have to say.expe wrote:We already knew he was a twat, like he always says, it's in the DNA, but this was just 100% confirmation for anyone who was doubting it.columbo wrote:I dont think it was classy of Eubank to be posturing when the guy was laying completely outcold.
-
Boxing Prospect
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 6592
- Joined: 25 Jun 2012, 14:35
Re: Conquest vs Mckenzie RBR
They were hyped on tickets, but who really cares about the tickets? It should be talent that gets spoken about. For some reason in this country we seem to spend more time saying "well they sell 800 tickets" rather then "they were a 3 time amateur national champion". We seem to focus promotion on tickets rather than making promoters promote shows. The ticket seller system might be needed but it makes promoters lazy.expe wrote: They were mainly hyped as a result of selling lots of tickets, wasn't really like anyone had truly bought into it and thought they were world beaters. You can't say their popularity was undeserved either, what does a fighter have to do to deserve popularity? They sell lots of tickets, most likely because they're probably sound lads who are a good laugh to be around and as time goes on, more and more people start coming along, it's not really a reflection of ability, loads of very average fighters have been very popular, Arturo Gatti being a good example, then there's fighters like Rigondeaux who have more talent in their little toe, but he's not great to watch if you're not a purist, so he's not a big draw.
What does a fighter need to do to deserve to be popular? Something. Keane and Buglioni were hyped to the heavens on debut due to their popularity. That is undeserved and achievement should earn you popularity and should the way you achieve it.
Gatti was popular due to his style, as you said, did Buglioni strike you as that style? Did Keane? To me the answer is no.
Neither Keane nor Buglioni had anything that great about them in the ring and neither made me think "wow, I can't wait to see these" the only thing I got from watching them was "why are the comms sucking them off? They look clumsy, defensively flawed and aren't doing anything that makes me think wow"
-
MightyWarrior
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13364
- Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01
Re: Conquest vs Mckenzie RBR
Poor stoppage of Frankie Buglioni, thank god his corner waved it off, as the clueless idiot ref appeared happy to let Frankie get his head taken off. Someone needs to take that ref to task as that was shockingly bad.
Re: Conquest vs Mckenzie RBR
columbo wrote:He's trying to be his dad. He should be his own man.jameswilson wrote:He was wanting to copy his Dad vs Reginaldo Dos Santos.columbo wrote:I dont think it was classy of Eubank to be posturing when the guy was laying completely outcold.
Yeah he is. His dad was amusing though, at least he was to me, a real character. Eubank junior isn't a character he's just a t**t, a wannabe.
If he wants any respect he'd be best advised to stop trying to be his old man, it's not novelty now, it's boring, been done before.
Re: Conquest vs Mckenzie RBR
He has learnt f*ck all since his fight with Bradley Pryce. Complete mis - match just now huge size difference he should have been done with those fights a while ago.ShadrachSimmo wrote:The guys an embarrassing parody of his dad.columbo wrote:I dont think it was classy of Eubank to be posturing when the guy was laying completely outcold.
A fight with someone like Saunders or Ryder etc just won't happen anytime soon.
He needs to step up and fast.
He could have fought Nick Blackwell last year to become mandatory for the British a year ago which would have been genuine 50/50 and he was ready then.
Reason I can't stand the guy is that he mouthed off how he would beat BJS easy then pulls out of a chance to force a fight with him.
Re: Conquest vs Mckenzie RBR
Be keen to see the BJS fight.
Thing is with Eubank Jr, his Dad needed the arrogant image to get attention. Jr turned pro in a blaze of publicity, with most boxing fans desperate for him to succeed. He probably could have become very popular playing the humble role. Seems like he's actually hurting his marketability.
Thing is with Eubank Jr, his Dad needed the arrogant image to get attention. Jr turned pro in a blaze of publicity, with most boxing fans desperate for him to succeed. He probably could have become very popular playing the humble role. Seems like he's actually hurting his marketability.