Pacquiao/Bradley II (with undercard)

For RBR threads only
sucracristo
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1828
Joined: 24 Dec 2011, 23:47

Re: Pacquiao/Bradley II (with undercard)

Post by sucracristo »

I just can't stand usmanni's style. almost all his shots are flicking pot
shots as he goes in and out switching left to right and bowing at the waist.
ikorolev
Middleweight
Posts: 4895
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 19:08

Re: Pacquiao/Bradley II (with undercard)

Post by ikorolev »

sucracristo wrote:I just can't stand usmanni's style. almost all his shots are flicking pot
shots as he goes in and out switching left to right and bowing at the waist.
He did have Beltran miss A LOT.
sucracristo
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1828
Joined: 24 Dec 2011, 23:47

Re: Pacquiao/Bradley II (with undercard)

Post by sucracristo »

good last round but usmanee doesn't deserve more than a round or two
on my card.
sucracristo
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1828
Joined: 24 Dec 2011, 23:47

Re: Pacquiao/Bradley II (with undercard)

Post by sucracristo »

ikorolev wrote:
sucracristo wrote:I just can't stand usmanni's style. almost all his shots are flicking pot
shots as he goes in and out switching left to right and bowing at the waist.
He did have Beltran miss A LOT.
beltran missed a lot and he didn't throw as much, but he landed all the meaningful shots
BROZO
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 429
Joined: 25 Jun 2005, 22:20

Re: Pacquiao/Bradley II (with undercard)

Post by BROZO »

any streams? much appreciated in advance
No Tomorrow
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Pacquiao/Bradley II (with undercard)

Post by No Tomorrow »

Bud light lime is nice
No Tomorrow
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Pacquiao/Bradley II (with undercard)

Post by No Tomorrow »

Let's go Bradley
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46246
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Pacquiao/Bradley II (with undercard)

Post by gilgamesh »

Hi-hat wrote:
DetroitHxC wrote:I'm drinking Bud Light Lime and I'm not afraid to admit it. :geek2:

poo was free! :OhYes:
Free beer is the best beer. eff em.
Then I'm drinking some quality Natural Ice right now then cuz it didn't cost me sh*t. :lol:
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46246
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Pacquiao/Bradley II (with undercard)

Post by gilgamesh »

In on the Killtaker wrote:
Hi-hat wrote:
In on the Killtaker wrote:No one in Fugazi is gay.
Apparently, the fans are.
Only a stupid delusional Christian fuckhead like yourself would use "gay" as an insult.
Only someone that's totally gay would say using gay as an insult is Christian. You're f*cking gay.

By the way I'm an atheist gaywad :lol:
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46246
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Pacquiao/Bradley II (with undercard)

Post by gilgamesh »

DetroitHxC wrote::lol: :salut:

We came really close to having Natty Ice, but I'm glad it didn't happen.
I'd be glad it didn't happen too. Natty Ice is brutal.....but effective.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46246
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Pacquiao/Bradley II (with undercard)

Post by gilgamesh »

Hi-hat wrote: Fugazi is alright with me. They just attract the damnedest people.
I'm actually not familiar with Fugazi except for one song that this dude posted the other day. For the record that one song sucked. I don't know if they have better sh*t, but I hope so.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46246
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Pacquiao/Bradley II (with undercard)

Post by gilgamesh »

DetroitHxC wrote:Ok, now to the fight.

Right, so I got berated, attacked, and somewhat abused for scoring the first fight 116-112 for Pacquiao, and then stating afterwards I didn't see why everyone thought it was so one-sided.

I rooted for Bradley that night, and I kind of am tonight, though I am a huge fan of Manny Pacquiao.

I think this fight could go a lot of ways, and I have no idea what's going to happen. I certainly don't feel strongly enough one way or another to bet on this one.

I'm going to enjoy it, but it does suck that one of these guys will most likely walk away with a loss tonight.

I just hope neither of them get hurt this time. A nice, even, clear conclusion is all I really want to see tonight.
I'm not gonna be able to watch the fight Live tonight, for reasons which you already know D, but I look forward to hearing the RBR updates from you and everyone else. I'm sure I'll have an idea what's going down with you guys at the helm, who won the Vargas/Alakcardiev or whatever the f*ck his name is fight.
squiggy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2093
Joined: 04 Feb 2008, 03:35

Re: Pacquiao/Bradley II (with undercard)

Post by squiggy »

could someone pm a still working stream...?
sucracristo
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1828
Joined: 24 Dec 2011, 23:47

Re: Pacquiao/Bradley II (with undercard)

Post by sucracristo »

not much happened. if I have to give it to someone then I guess Bradley
but I don't think either deserved to have that scored for them
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Pacquiao/Bradley II (with undercard)

Post by crusader »

1-1
AZOSI
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27
Joined: 07 May 2009, 14:59

Re: Pacquiao/Bradley II (with undercard)

Post by AZOSI »

1-1 As well
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46246
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Pacquiao/Bradley II (with undercard)

Post by gilgamesh »

What the f*ck a stream I'm watching is still showing the walk-ins :lol:

I'm way behind the times over here.
sucracristo
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1828
Joined: 24 Dec 2011, 23:47

Re: Pacquiao/Bradley II (with undercard)

Post by sucracristo »

ok, when these complete strangers come on here and ask for streams,
take a sec and think "if I were somebody who shuts down streams, where
would I go to find them?"
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Pacquiao/Bradley II (with undercard)

Post by crusader »

2-1 Pac
ikorolev
Middleweight
Posts: 4895
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 19:08

Re: Pacquiao/Bradley II (with undercard)

Post by ikorolev »

Bradley got Provo virus ! He is right: he can only beat Manny this way.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46246
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Pacquiao/Bradley II (with undercard)

Post by gilgamesh »

sucracristo wrote:ok, when these complete strangers come on here and ask for streams,
take a sec and think "if I were somebody who shuts down streams, where
would I go to find them?"
:TU: No doubt. That's what I do. If I don't know this mahfucka asking for a stream I ain't telling him sh*t.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Pacquiao/Bradley II (with undercard)

Post by crusader »

Bradley looked sloppy that round
squiggy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2093
Joined: 04 Feb 2008, 03:35

Re: Pacquiao/Bradley II (with undercard)

Post by squiggy »

Yeah, I shut down your stream. I also nabbed your passwords and credit cards.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Pacquiao/Bradley II (with undercard)

Post by crusader »

2-2
Uppercut1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 302
Joined: 26 Jun 2008, 09:10

Re: Pacquiao/Bradley II (with undercard)

Post by Uppercut1 »

What up, peeps?

I can't find a decent stream, so I guess I'll just keep refreshing this thread for updates.

Is Bradley going all slugfest like he did against Provo?
Post Reply