Page 3 of 3

Re: Froch v Golovkin at 168 - who wins?

Posted: 02 Jun 2014, 14:41
by whiskey
TheLeprechaun wrote:
ashedward wrote: I saw that video at the time,and think Froch was being a bit dopey and answering for Groves rather then himself like had done before in previous question.

Wow. Come on mate, theres excuses and then there is just silliness. Froch was 100% serious there.
No he wasn't


http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x1y49h ... ever_sport

Re: Froch v Golovkin at 168 - who wins?

Posted: 02 Jun 2014, 15:47
by Bard of Boxrec
TheLeprechaun wrote:
Boxerbeetle123 wrote:
TheLeprechaun wrote:Froch would never fight him. Too fearful of the power.
I hope that's sarcasm, otherwise good God, what more does Froch have to do to prove his courage? Fight a Klitschko?


go to 9.50 of this video. Froch admits Golovkin punches too hard. "I'll swerve golovkin like the plague, punches like a mule, I don't need to be in with him"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hV1jSJpDLZI
Froch has earned the right to swerve anyone and not get stick for it but as a fan that hurts to hear :( Never thought I'd hear him say something like that either. I was wondering whether he was messing about but it seems like there's some truth in there with the wry expression. The money wouldn't be big enough either.

Re: Froch v Golovkin at 168 - who wins?

Posted: 02 Jun 2014, 16:17
by TheLeprechaun
Riddick Blowe wrote:
Froch has earned the right to swerve anyone and not get stick for it but as a fan that hurts to hear :( Never thought I'd hear him say something like that either. I was wondering whether he was messing about but it seems like there's some truth in there with the wry expression. The money wouldn't be big enough either.


Agreed 100%. I was only pointing out that he had no intention of fighting Golovkin due to Golovkins power. He's earned the right to go for the big money fight now, whereever it is, and not get any stick. He certainly won't be getting stick from me for swerving GGG

Re: Froch v Golovkin at 168 - who wins?

Posted: 02 Jun 2014, 16:45
by Final round
Boxingcutsman wrote:
Counter-puncher wrote:nice namedrop, too, its that kind of 'I'm dropping a name but it's not such a big name that it'll seem like a blatant namedrop, it's just that I happen to have a story which involves me dropping a name' namedrop. not that 'hey look everyone I know ... X' kind of namedrop

:TU:

:lol: wasn't meant has a name drop, if I was gonna drop names then I could of said that last Tuesday My wife & I had breakfast with David Hasslehoff in ChinoLatino in London & then later on that day met up with Elton John at Claridges in London, but I didn't, even though amazingly it's a true story :lol: :TU:

But getting back to Golovkin, the way his power has been described to me, it's genuinely unbelievable mate, freakish.
'London' ??? You flash pudendum

Re: Froch v Golovkin at 168 - who wins?

Posted: 03 Jun 2014, 04:35
by Boxingcutsman
Final round wrote:
Boxingcutsman wrote:
Counter-puncher wrote:nice namedrop, too, its that kind of 'I'm dropping a name but it's not such a big name that it'll seem like a blatant namedrop, it's just that I happen to have a story which involves me dropping a name' namedrop. not that 'hey look everyone I know ... X' kind of namedrop

:TU:

:lol: wasn't meant has a name drop, if I was gonna drop names then I could of said that last Tuesday My wife & I had breakfast with David Hasslehoff in ChinoLatino in London & then later on that day met up with Elton John at Claridges in London, but I didn't, even though amazingly it's a true story :lol: :TU:

But getting back to Golovkin, the way his power has been described to me, it's genuinely unbelievable mate, freakish.
'London' ??? You flash pudendum
I know, check me out :lol:

Re: Froch v Golovkin at 168 - who wins?

Posted: 03 Jun 2014, 17:19
by Final round
:D :TU: so the big question is ..are the Hoff and Elton boxing fans.

Re: Froch v Golovkin at 168 - who wins?

Posted: 03 Jun 2014, 18:12
by knockout
I am in agreement with earlier posters, froch has the best resume of any British Boxer of modern times, outside of Lennox. To start criticising him for dodging is not on

Re: Froch v Golovkin at 168 - who wins?

Posted: 03 Jun 2014, 18:21
by knockout
I am also not sure how much I buy into this mutant power GGG has. Yes he hits hard but just how much harder than the next best middleweight can he hit?? Given the nature of the human body in sports it's more or less impossible to see any one person, who's power is so much than their peers. Obviously there is always the top dog but they are never 'that' far ahead of the field.

Re: Froch v Golovkin at 168 - who wins?

Posted: 03 Jun 2014, 18:23
by SteveDow
knockout wrote:I am also not sure how much I buy into this mutant power GGG has. Yes he hits hard but just how much harder than the next best middleweight can he hit?? Given the nature of the human body in sports it's more or less impossible to see any one person, who's power is so much than their peers. Obviously there is always the top dog but they are never 'that' far ahead of the field.
http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=kRsxQ5uSP0Y

I know this is only a pad session but this is pretty spectacular stuff. Check the above link.

Re: Froch v Golovkin at 168 - who wins?

Posted: 03 Jun 2014, 18:49
by Boxerbeetle
SteveDow wrote:
knockout wrote:I am also not sure how much I buy into this mutant power GGG has. Yes he hits hard but just how much harder than the next best middleweight can he hit?? Given the nature of the human body in sports it's more or less impossible to see any one person, who's power is so much than their peers. Obviously there is always the top dog but they are never 'that' far ahead of the field.
http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=kRsxQ5uSP0Y

I know this is only a pad session but this is pretty spectacular stuff. Check the above link.
I don't think there's any doubting GGG's power, but if Stevens, Adamu & Rosado can last 22 rounds against GGG between them, it doesn't seem too much of a stretch that a genuine super-middle with a proven chin like Froch can take GGG the distance.

What I do doubt, however, is that Froch would genuinely go out of his way to 'swerve' GGG; Froch has never shown signs of being scared of anyone, let alone a middleweight whose best win is against Macklin. I honestly don't know what else Froch can do to win some people over, he's fought absolutely everybody worth fighting in his division, yet still has his courage questioned!

Re: Froch v Golovkin at 168 - who wins?

Posted: 03 Jun 2014, 19:51
by TheLeprechaun
knockout wrote:I am in agreement with earlier posters, froch has the best resume of any British Boxer of modern times, outside of Lennox. To start criticising him for dodging is not on

There is a difference between pointing out that Froch has SAID HIMSELF that he is dodging Golovkin, and criticising Froch for dodging Golovkin. I never criticised him, I merely pointed out that he is swerving GGG and wants none of him.

Re: Froch v Golovkin at 168 - who wins?

Posted: 03 Jun 2014, 19:52
by TheLeprechaun
Boxerbeetle123 wrote: What I do doubt, however, is that Froch would genuinely go out of his way to 'swerve' GGG; Froch has never shown signs of being scared of anyone, let alone a middleweight whose best win is against Macklin. I honestly don't know what else Froch can do to win some people over, he's fought absolutely everybody worth fighting in his division, yet still has his courage questioned!

You may want to watch the actual video linked in the thread where Froch admits that he will "swerve Golovkin like the plague, hits like a mule".

Re: Froch v Golovkin at 168 - who wins?

Posted: 03 Jun 2014, 19:57
by zero
knockout wrote:I am also not sure how much I buy into this mutant power GGG has. Yes he hits hard but just how much harder than the next best middleweight can he hit?? Given the nature of the human body in sports it's more or less impossible to see any one person, who's power is so much than their peers. Obviously there is always the top dog but they are never 'that' far ahead of the field.
I think it's safe to say he hits very hard, although hitting bigger men might not have the same effect.

As for the video about Froch mentioning GGG, I thought that was blatant tongue and cheek and rather obvious, do you really believe a world class fighter would come out publicly and say "I'll swerve him like the plague, he punches like a mule, I don't need to be in with him" just remember he looked at the crowd and laughed. Froch fought Bute straight after Ward loss. I doubt Carl Froch fears any fighter.

Re: Froch v Golovkin at 168 - who wins?

Posted: 03 Jun 2014, 20:00
by TheLeprechaun
:lol:

It's just comical how Brits will rationalize things like that. :lol:

Priceless stuff :lol:

BJS was also tongue in cheek when he basically admitted Golovkin would beat him in his most recent ifilm interview as well right?

I want to hear Froch say he wants none of Golovkin in another interview, just to see how you guys will rationalize it again. "He was just joking, watch his previous interview on Golovkin as well, he likes to joke about swerving him" :lol:

Re: Froch v Golovkin at 168 - who wins?

Posted: 03 Jun 2014, 20:02
by zero
TheLeprechaun wrote::lol:

It's just comical how Brits will rationalize things like that. :lol:

Priceless stuff :lol:
Who's the Brit?

Re: Froch v Golovkin at 168 - who wins?

Posted: 03 Jun 2014, 20:04
by TheLeprechaun
zero wrote:
TheLeprechaun wrote::lol:

It's just comical how Brits will rationalize things like that. :lol:

Priceless stuff :lol:
Who's the Brit?

Sorry mate, it's genuinely comical. I'm cracking up here :lol:

Well, it gave me a good laugh before sleep anyway. Cheers.

You're entitled to your opinion so it's fair enough.

Re: Froch v Golovkin at 168 - who wins?

Posted: 03 Jun 2014, 20:08
by zero
TheLeprechaun wrote:
zero wrote:
TheLeprechaun wrote::lol:

It's just comical how Brits will rationalize things like that. :lol:

Priceless stuff :lol:
Who's the Brit?

Sorry mate, it's genuinely comical. I'm cracking up here :lol:

Well, it gave me a good laugh before sleep anyway. Cheers.

You're entitled to your opinion so it's fair enough.

Good stuff, jog on now and don't let the door hit you on the way out.

Re: Froch v Golovkin at 168 - who wins?

Posted: 03 Jun 2014, 22:22
by zero
TheLeprechaun wrote::lol:

It's just comical how Brits will rationalize things like that. :lol:

Priceless stuff :lol:

BJS was also tongue in cheek when he basically admitted Golovkin would beat him in his most recent ifilm interview as well right?

I want to hear Froch say he wants none of Golovkin in another interview, just to see how you guys will rationalize it again. "He was just joking, watch his previous interview on Golovkin as well, he likes to joke about swerving him" :lol:
Are you comparing BJS with Froch? If so just ban yourself.

Re: Froch v Golovkin at 168 - who wins?

Posted: 03 Jun 2014, 23:21
by TheLeprechaun
zero wrote:
TheLeprechaun wrote::lol:

It's just comical how Brits will rationalize things like that. :lol:

Priceless stuff :lol:

BJS was also tongue in cheek when he basically admitted Golovkin would beat him in his most recent ifilm interview as well right?

I want to hear Froch say he wants none of Golovkin in another interview, just to see how you guys will rationalize it again. "He was just joking, watch his previous interview on Golovkin as well, he likes to joke about swerving him" :lol:
Are you comparing BJS with Froch? If so just ban yourself.

Strong reading comprehension level.

Re: Froch v Golovkin at 168 - who wins?

Posted: 04 Jun 2014, 01:33
by zero
TheLeprechaun wrote:
zero wrote:
TheLeprechaun wrote::lol:

It's just comical how Brits will rationalize things like that. :lol:

Priceless stuff :lol:

BJS was also tongue in cheek when he basically admitted Golovkin would beat him in his most recent ifilm interview as well right?

I want to hear Froch say he wants none of Golovkin in another interview, just to see how you guys will rationalize it again. "He was just joking, watch his previous interview on Golovkin as well, he likes to joke about swerving him" :lol:
Are you comparing BJS with Froch? If so just ban yourself.

Strong reading comprehension level.
:lol: