Page 3 of 4
Re: GGG
Posted: 22 Oct 2014, 09:08
by Crazyboy
thechump wrote:Crazyboy wrote:thechump wrote:He is probably the most exciting fighter in world boxing at the moment but i cant stand his interviews,max kellerman asks him a question and he answers with something totally different to the question,is it a language barrier or is the guy punchy? Its cringy listening to him,the should get borat in to conduct the interviews with him haha
Language barrier blatently, and despite all that I still think he comes across better than most, always seems very respectful in the interviews I have seen.
Classy guy and fantastic fighter
I know its a language barrier duh. Ppl on here need to get a sense of humour ffs.
good fighter but im not gonna change my opinion on his interviews
I genuinely thought you were asking a question? I have (I think) a decent sense of humour but you weren't funny.....
Not sure what you are on about mate.
Re: GGG
Posted: 22 Oct 2014, 09:09
by Datsue
^ If anything, having that fvckwit Angel Garcia say anything at all about Golovkin is in danger of making me GGG's #1 fan.
Shilling mouthy pudendum, so obvious that he's so anti- a certain network because the pudendum's spawn is now under the slimy aegis of Haymon at the other major network.
Re: GGG
Posted: 22 Oct 2014, 09:27
by Bard of Boxrec
GGG is a beast. He's going to beat everyone. I'm nuts deep aboard the G-train and thrusting hard. CHOOO CHOOOOOOOOO
But seriously. Ward is in for a whole night of pain if he steps in the ring with this guy. No amount of knowing crowing from Ward advocates will make me see otherwise. No amount of 'BUT A BETTER BOXER BEATS A BETTER PUNCHER EVERY TIME LOLZ AND HE IS BIGGER TOO LOLZ' can detract from the argument in favour of the savage show of uberviolence GGG brings to the party.
Nothing can stop this train. Nothing!
Re: GGG
Posted: 22 Oct 2014, 10:45
by black panther
Riddick Blowe wrote:GGG is a beast. He's going to beat everyone. I'm nuts deep aboard the G-train and thrusting hard. CHOOO CHOOOOOOOOO
But seriously. Ward is in for a whole night of pain if he steps in the ring with this guy. No amount of knowing crowing from Ward advocates will make me see otherwise. No amount of 'BUT A BETTER BOXER BEATS A BETTER PUNCHER EVERY TIME LOLZ AND HE IS BIGGER TOO LOLZ' can detract from the argument in favour of the savage show of uberviolence GGG brings to the party.
Nothing can stop this train. Nothing!
Diddy <3 <3 Ward wrote: No euro trashmen will ever beat Ward. Are you mad bruh? LOLZ Seriously you are mad to think anyone can beat Ward. Damn this Ward juice is good brah LOLZ
It amazes me that some people cant understand how good Andre Ward is. And why he's good. He is Bernard Hopkins with youth and speed.
You really are an immense jackass.
Ps. Trashmen, eurobums, garbage , UK robberies, brah
Re: GGG
Posted: 22 Oct 2014, 10:47
by jamesmcdonnell
Riddick Blowe wrote:GGG is a beast. He's going to beat everyone. I'm nuts deep aboard the G-train and thrusting hard. CHOOO CHOOOOOOOOO
But seriously. Ward is in for a whole night of pain if he steps in the ring with this guy. No amount of knowing crowing from Ward advocates will make me see otherwise. No amount of 'BUT A BETTER BOXER BEATS A BETTER PUNCHER EVERY TIME LOLZ AND HE IS BIGGER TOO LOLZ' can detract from the argument in favour of the savage show of uberviolence GGG brings to the party.
Nothing can stop this train. Nothing!
Are you taking the piss here? I suspect you are. The only people using LOLZ in their shitty posts are the GGG fanatics.
Re: GGG
Posted: 22 Oct 2014, 10:51
by black panther
jamesmcdonnell wrote:Riddick Blowe wrote:GGG is a beast. He's going to beat everyone. I'm nuts deep aboard the G-train and thrusting hard. CHOOO CHOOOOOOOOO
But seriously. Ward is in for a whole night of pain if he steps in the ring with this guy. No amount of knowing crowing from Ward advocates will make me see otherwise. No amount of 'BUT A BETTER BOXER BEATS A BETTER PUNCHER EVERY TIME LOLZ AND HE IS BIGGER TOO LOLZ' can detract from the argument in favour of the savage show of uberviolence GGG brings to the party.
Nothing can stop this train. Nothing!
Are you taking the piss here? I suspect you are. The only people using LOLZ in their shitty posts are the GGG fanatics.
"Brah", "LOLz", "Euro Trashmen", "Garbage", "In the UK you get robbed blind" are all phrases used by a certain Ward fan when describing world class boxer. He posts in the current scene regularly. He's actually a decent poster at times but his arrogance and absolute belief that he cannot possibly be wrong about anything are his failings.
Re: GGG
Posted: 22 Oct 2014, 11:26
by whiskey
Canelo , Froch and GGG all fight north of 170 on fight night.
Froch is usually 173/174 and GGG was 170 against Macklin on the night.
Re: GGG
Posted: 22 Oct 2014, 11:32
by Bard of Boxrec
black panther wrote:jamesmcdonnell wrote:Riddick Blowe wrote:GGG is a beast. He's going to beat everyone. I'm nuts deep aboard the G-train and thrusting hard. CHOOO CHOOOOOOOOO
But seriously. Ward is in for a whole night of pain if he steps in the ring with this guy. No amount of knowing crowing from Ward advocates will make me see otherwise. No amount of 'BUT A BETTER BOXER BEATS A BETTER PUNCHER EVERY TIME LOLZ AND HE IS BIGGER TOO LOLZ' can detract from the argument in favour of the savage show of uberviolence GGG brings to the party.
Nothing can stop this train. Nothing!
Are you taking the piss here? I suspect you are. The only people using LOLZ in their shitty posts are the GGG fanatics.
"Brah", "LOLz", "Euro Trashmen", "Garbage", "In the UK you get robbed blind" are all phrases used by a certain Ward fan when describing world class boxer. He posts in the current scene regularly. He's actually a decent poster at times but his arrogance and absolute belief that he cannot possibly be wrong about anything are his failings.
Diddy doesn't use all those phrases but he does have a boner for Ward.
James, I was just referring to those odd people who seem to be convinced that a good boxer will always beat a good puncher without assessing specific matchups in close detail, disregarding fights in history that went to the contrary and seemingly mostly as an antidote to perceived fanatics of the bloodthirsty types.
Re: GGG
Posted: 23 Oct 2014, 04:23
by black panther
He uses trashmen and garbage a fair amount when describing fighters. Just really gets my goat when people do that. If professional boxers are garbage, what does that make an internet boxing fan who probably couldn't throw a left hook to save his life then?
Just don't like it when people disrespect the men who put their health and lives on the line for our entertainment.
Re: GGG
Posted: 23 Oct 2014, 04:38
by Ezzard
Golovkin-Murray would be a top fight. Martin looks big at the weight to me and he's a bit of a beast. Seems like the kind of guy who is very durable.
I wouldn't expect Murray to go down and Golovkin would be forced to fight 12 rounds. That's the fight I'd like to see.
Golovkin should just stay at 160 and be the Middleweight king just like Hagler and Monzon.
Re: GGG
Posted: 23 Oct 2014, 05:07
by Ian1973
Ezzard wrote:Golovkin-Murray would be a top fight. Martin looks big at the weight to me and he's a bit of a beast. Seems like the kind of guy who is very durable.
I wouldn't expect Murray to go down and Golovkin would be forced to fight 12 rounds. That's the fight I'd like to see.
Golovkin should just stay at 160 and be the Middleweight king just like Hagler and Monzon.
Golovkin beats Murray easily.
Re: GGG
Posted: 23 Oct 2014, 05:26
by Bard of Boxrec
Ezzard wrote:Golovkin-Murray would be a top fight. Martin looks big at the weight to me and he's a bit of a beast. Seems like the kind of guy who is very durable.
I wouldn't expect Murray to go down and Golovkin would be forced to fight 12 rounds. That's the fight I'd like to see.
Golovkin should just stay at 160 and be the Middleweight king just like Hagler and Monzon.
Not sure if serious.
Re: GGG
Posted: 23 Oct 2014, 10:40
by palooka
Ezzard wrote:Golovkin-Murray would be a top fight. Martin looks big at the weight to me and he's a bit of a beast. Seems like the kind of guy who is very durable.
I wouldn't expect Murray to go down and Golovkin would be forced to fight 12 rounds. That's the fight I'd like to see.
Golovkin should just stay at 160 and be the Middleweight king just like Hagler and Monzon.
Has Horse possessed Ezzard?
Re: GGG
Posted: 23 Oct 2014, 10:52
by MightyWarrior
Thank god he's finally getting world recognition, because in the early days, as the owner of an obscure middleweight belt, fighting in far flung places and with a legal problem holding him back, I was worried his best days might disappear under the radar.
The only trouble now is matching him in meaningful matches, the likes of which Marvin Hagler eventually had - but just can't see who it's going to be. The likes of Murray is just a waste of time really, Cotto would be brutalised, and the rest of the top 30 at middleweight would be beaten 2 or 3 on the same night.
If I was managing him, it's got to be pay a superstar like Alvarez to step up - he'll get beat too, but you'd get massive viewing figures and it would be nearing the realms of a a mini super fight. Put them both on the same bill, then next up it's Showtime.
Re: GGG
Posted: 23 Oct 2014, 11:08
by Ricky_
G0mez wrote:Canelo , Froch and GGG all fight north of 170 on fight night.
Froch is usually 173/174 and GGG was 170 against Macklin on the night.
GGG i think was 172 vs Rubio, same as Canelo weighed vs Trout.
Re: GGG
Posted: 23 Oct 2014, 11:43
by Bard of Boxrec
MightyWarrior wrote:Thank god he's finally getting world recognition, because in the early days, as the owner of an obscure middleweight belt, fighting in far flung places and with a legal problem holding him back, I was worried his best days might disappear under the radar.
The only trouble now is matching him in meaningful matches, the likes of which Marvin Hagler eventually had - but just can't see who it's going to be. The likes of Murray is just a waste of time really, Cotto would be brutalised, and the rest of the top 30 at middleweight would be beaten 2 or 3 on the same night.
If I was managing him, it's got to be pay a superstar like Alvarez to step up - he'll get beat too, but you'd get massive viewing figures and it would be nearing the realms of a a mini super fight. Put them both on the same bill, then next up it's Showtime.
Yeah I would be happy with Alvarez for now but I'm presuming Saul can get paid megabucks fighting easier foes.
Re: GGG
Posted: 23 Oct 2014, 11:47
by arlovski
The only guy i can see as a serious threat to Golovkin is Denis Douglin, providing he comes through the Groves test next month
Re: GGG
Posted: 23 Oct 2014, 11:51
by palooka
arlovski wrote:The only guy i can see as a serious threat to Golovkin is Denis Douglin, providing he comes through the Groves test next month
And providing he wears armour plating and fires missiles into the ring from the changing room?
Re: GGG
Posted: 23 Oct 2014, 12:20
by Deserter
Ezzard wrote:Golovkin should just stay at 160 and be the Middleweight king just like Hagler and Monzon.
Agree completely.
Re: GGG
Posted: 23 Oct 2014, 13:56
by lefty
Terry Dooley wrote:Riddick Blowe wrote:MightyWarrior wrote:Thank god he's finally getting world recognition, because in the early days, as the owner of an obscure middleweight belt, fighting in far flung places and with a legal problem holding him back, I was worried his best days might disappear under the radar.
The only trouble now is matching him in meaningful matches, the likes of which Marvin Hagler eventually had - but just can't see who it's going to be. The likes of Murray is just a waste of time really, Cotto would be brutalised, and the rest of the top 30 at middleweight would be beaten 2 or 3 on the same night.
If I was managing him, it's got to be pay a superstar like Alvarez to step up - he'll get beat too, but you'd get massive viewing figures and it would be nearing the realms of a a mini super fight. Put them both on the same bill, then next up it's Showtime.
Yeah I would be happy with Alvarez for now but I'm presuming Saul can get paid megabucks fighting easier foes.
Alvarez is a busted flush. I'd be amazed if they let him anywhere near GGG.
Why do you think that Terry? The first sentence I mean.
Re: GGG
Posted: 23 Oct 2014, 22:33
by davie
Ian1973 wrote:Ezzard wrote:Golovkin-Murray would be a top fight. Martin looks big at the weight to me and he's a bit of a beast. Seems like the kind of guy who is very durable.
I wouldn't expect Murray to go down and Golovkin would be forced to fight 12 rounds. That's the fight I'd like to see.
Golovkin should just stay at 160 and be the Middleweight king just like Hagler and Monzon.
Golovkin beats Murray easily.
I agree, but Murray would last longer than his last few opponents and give GGG his toughest test in the last couple years
Re: GGG
Posted: 24 Oct 2014, 02:45
by lillywhite14
It's a shame there is no real rival for him as of yet. Mayweather would be crazy to go anywhere near him. If only Martinez was a few years younger.
I think Froch would give him plenty of trouble, which he does to anyone. Not sure Golovkin should move up though. The names aren't big enough to warrant it if he is so comfortable at middle. Ward is an obvious choice but he would no doubt want Golovkin at light heavy and in his own backyard.
Re: GGG
Posted: 24 Oct 2014, 18:25
by crusader
Re: GGG
Posted: 24 Oct 2014, 19:07
by TerribleTerry
Murray's tight guard will mean he probably lasts longer than the majority of recent challengers but I don't think he has anything offensively to worry GGG.
Re: GGG
Posted: 25 Oct 2014, 05:32
by Ian1973
TerribleTerry wrote:
Murray's tight guard will mean he probably lasts longer than the majority of recent challengers but I don't think he has anything offensively to worry GGG.
Murray is tough and he'll go a few rounds.
He's not as good as horse thinks he is though.
