Re: Anyone honestly believe Soliman vs Taylor was fixed?
Posted: 06 Dec 2014, 19:01
Funny thread this one and there's an open invitation for the Goose to come and make more of a goose of himself here any time he likes 
Pureist wrote:You seriously are a moron, you think he threw the fight to make some cash on the odds, while doing so threw his world title away along with other pay days, you seem to think he had to fight GGG, he could have fought ten other people without going near GGG, who cares if he said he only wants ......... Every fighter does that and you talk yourself up that you know the game, your a joke!
As we saw Soliman carried on as best he could after the injury. But not many fighters manage to win after they have been reduced to one leg.polecateddy wrote:I would imagine similar to say Nicky Cook and Darren Baker, he went into the world title fight knowing he wasn't anywhere near 100% but hoped for the best. Decent boxing paydays don't exactly grow on trees and the financial lure to carry on regardless was strong.
DA GOOSE wrote:Pureist wrote:You seriously are a moron, you think he threw the fight to make some cash on the odds, while doing so threw his world title away along with other pay days, you seem to think he had to fight GGG, he could have fought ten other people without going near GGG, who cares if he said he only wants ......... Every fighter does that and you talk yourself up that you know the game, your a joke!
I voted. Me and someone else voted for fixed at least theirs 1 other poster here who can figure things out for themselves.buster007 wrote:didn't bother reading cause I knew it would be dribble from the goose who is too scared to vote, lol.
So from the vast knowledge and experience you have gathered from years on a boxing forum (equates to zero knowledge or experience) you in your great WISDOMDA GOOSE wrote:I voted. Me and someone else voted for fixed at least theirs 1 other poster here who can figure things out for themselves.buster007 wrote:didn't bother reading cause I knew it would be dribble from the goose who is too scared to vote, lol.
Sounding every bit the excited little school girlDA GOOSE wrote:I would just like to say this topic has the 8th most views(besides sticky's)on the first page of the forum. I would like to thank bash for cash for starting this thread. Thanks bfcthank you to the other person who see's the truth(if I have only convinced 1 person I have made a difference)and although I have less than 100 posts in 2 years here my legion of fans(most notably buster007 and pureist. DA GOOSE holds aloft his keyboard to rapturous applause) and pledge to continue to enlighten you all with my insightful,informative posts. Thank you people,thank you.
![]()
![]()
![]()
It's a forum I voted you always call people cowards,or fighters like Green and Hopkins having no testicles.buster007 wrote:the goose is embarrassed about being laughed at cause he was too chicken to vote.
what a coward, lol.
Yet you yourself beg moderators to remove threads and report posters who make you look silly to the mods. No normal person cares what strangers think of them on a forum. Especially know nothings like you and pureist.buster007
Post subject: Re: Green to fight on
PostPosted: 26 Aug 2011, 03:13
Joined: 11 Oct 2007, 00:58
Posts: 1450
if he finds his testicles in the ring, then green has an exellent chance of winning.
the one time he went for the win, he had tarver really hurt, but didn't finish the job, he let tarver recover and paid the price.
Report this post
Top
It's Thursday arvo and I need a laugh, tell all of the know nothings of your quality pedigree in boxing, what in boxing have you achieved that sets you above the rest, how many fighters have you guided to wins from your experience, please tell us DCDA GOOSE wrote:It's a forum I voted you always call people cowards,or fighters like Green and Hopkins having no testicles.buster007 wrote:the goose is embarrassed about being laughed at cause he was too chicken to vote.
what a coward, lol.
http://www.boxingforum24.com/forumdisplay.php?f=9
Yet you yourself beg moderators to remove threads and report posters who make you look silly to the mods. No normal person cares what strangers think of them on a forum. Especially know nothings like you and pureist.buster007
Post subject: Re: Green to fight on
PostPosted: 26 Aug 2011, 03:13
Joined: 11 Oct 2007, 00:58
Posts: 1450
if he finds his testicles in the ring, then green has an exellent chance of winning.
the one time he went for the win, he had tarver really hurt, but didn't finish the job, he let tarver recover and paid the price.
Report this post
Top
Ha ha ha struck a nerve did I? unlike you I don't claim to be a hotshot trainer and denigrate people like Linc Hudson who doesn't bignote himself online. And unlike you I actually watch big fights Brook-Porter,Alvarez-Lara,Kovalev-Caparello(but pureist watched Mundine-Rabchenko 3 times probably on you-tube) and don't start threads commenting on fights I didn't see.Pureist wrote:It's Thursday arvo and I need a laugh, tell all of the know nothings of your quality pedigree in boxing, what in boxing have you achieved that sets you above the rest, how many fighters have you guided to wins from your experience, please tell us DCDA GOOSE wrote:It's a forum I voted you always call people cowards,or fighters like Green and Hopkins having no testicles.buster007 wrote:the goose is embarrassed about being laughed at cause he was too chicken to vote.
what a coward, lol.
http://www.boxingforum24.com/forumdisplay.php?f=9
Yet you yourself beg moderators to remove threads and report posters who make you look silly to the mods. No normal person cares what strangers think of them on a forum. Especially know nothings like you and pureist.buster007
Post subject: Re: Green to fight on
PostPosted: 26 Aug 2011, 03:13
Joined: 11 Oct 2007, 00:58
Posts: 1450
if he finds his testicles in the ring, then green has an exellent chance of winning.
the one time he went for the win, he had tarver really hurt, but didn't finish the job, he let tarver recover and paid the price.
Report this post
Top
Struck a nerve all right you try to be what you wish you were in real life on the internet and think your better than everyone else here because you train teenagers. You don't watch fights live and wouldn't even know who Robbie Peden is unlike you I don't need the admiration of strangers on the internet or the need for them to agree with my opinion. I can understand Sam telling Wheatley it happened in the 5th after his lawyer said it happened in the 4th honest mistake but then changing it to the 6th in the Aus-boxing interview very suspicious(not to mention before Golovkin-Geale saying he was knocking back lucrative,easier fights Macklin,Murray,Lee,Mundine) to fight Golovkin-Geale winner. Then fights a fighter with brain bleeds,inactivity and who had been fighting fighters ranked 100+(how he was ranked 15 by IBF I will never know Al Haymon's influence I suspect). Just because you probably fought a few drunks at the local R.S.L doesn't mean you know more than Larry Merchant.Pureist wrote:Didn't strike a nerve at all DC, just asked a couple of questions and like a politician you didn't answer one, you put forward an idiotic idea about throwing a fight with no proof and then basically say anyone who doesn't agree with you knows nothing about boxing, I was merely pointing out the floors in your argument, all you are is a spectator, nothing more, you have not fought, never been in a ring, but funnily according to you, you know more about the industry than the professionals, DC, your delusional
Again DC you haven't answered the questions I asked, I don't need the admiration of others on a forum, I know what I've achieved, you on the other hand just seem like a person who wanted to achieve but didn't have the intestinal fortitude to follow though, so instead you try to talk up your "knowledge" to try and raise your self confidence, you seem quite insecure to me, somewhat like a bully, you put on a brave face but when someone calls your bluff, you go to water and that's why you became a teacher because you like the power, the fact that your students " have" to do what you say, I think your a sad specimen for trying to tarnish a sportsman that has given his life to the sport you say you love, you need to man up and drop the conspiracy theory because your wrongDA GOOSE wrote:Struck a nerve all right you try to be what you wish you were in real life on the internet and think your better than everyone else here because you train teenagers. You don't watch fights live and wouldn't even know who Robbie Peden is unlike you I don't need the admiration of strangers on the internet or the need for them to agree with my opinion. I can understand Sam telling Wheatley it happened in the 5th after his lawyer said it happened in the 4th honest mistake but then changing it to the 6th in the Aus-boxing interview very suspicious(not to mention before Golovkin-Geale saying he was knocking back lucrative,easier fights Macklin,Murray,Lee,Mundine) to fight Golovkin-Geale winner. Then fights a fighter with brain bleeds,inactivity and who had been fighting fighters ranked 100+(how he was ranked 15 by IBF I will never know Al Haymon's influence I suspect). Just because you probably fought a few drunks at the local R.S.L doesn't mean you know more than Larry Merchant.Pureist wrote:Didn't strike a nerve at all DC, just asked a couple of questions and like a politician you didn't answer one, you put forward an idiotic idea about throwing a fight with no proof and then basically say anyone who doesn't agree with you knows nothing about boxing, I was merely pointing out the floors in your argument, all you are is a spectator, nothing more, you have not fought, never been in a ring, but funnily according to you, you know more about the industry than the professionals, DC, your delusionalD
Oh and how do you have floors in an argument?*flaws
Laughing at you. Both in the Aussie and the General seen any good fight cards lately? Or too busy teaching boxercise classes of a Sunday arvo.Pureist wrote:Absolute gold, just took a look at troll paradise and see your STILL talking about me there![]()
and you think you stuck a nerve with me, HA your kidding yourself DC
![]()
No boxercise, only boxing, but boxercise is where I'd suggest you start your illustrious career, you wouldn't want to peak too early now would you DC. What a classic, you say laughing at me, you must be cut to the bone posting about me at a forum I don't post at, I definately struck a nerve, PS you still haven't answered any questions I put to you, but really, how do you answer something you know nothing about hey spectatorDA GOOSE wrote:Laughing at you. Both in the Aussie and the General seen any good fight cards lately? Or too busy teaching boxercise classes of a Sunday arvo.Pureist wrote:Absolute gold, just took a look at troll paradise and see your STILL talking about me there![]()
and you think you stuck a nerve with me, HA your kidding yourself DC
![]()
D