BoxRec

Good stoppage, and that is that, really felt the burns fight was a good time for him to hang em up.

Baboon wrote:

tony1234 wrote:Coyle v Campbell coming to a PPV screen next year

I'm laughing.....but with the full (and sad) expectation that it could happen...

As I just said, Coyle is domestic level so PPV is a joke.

Someone look after Katsidis and retire him if he won't retire himself

lefty wrote:

Baboon wrote:

tony1234 wrote:Coyle v Campbell coming to a PPV screen next year

I'm laughing.....but with the full (and sad) expectation that it will happen...

Fixed that for ya lol

Indeed. Cynic.

Finch wrote:Yeah. He's clearly got nothing left given all the wars he has been in and a few years ago he'd have taken Coyle apart who is not much better than domestic level. He's already lost to two domestic fighters.

Coyle's not any better than domestic level.

Campbell and Coyle, FFS get a room.

Horse wrote:

Finch wrote:Yeah. He's clearly got nothing left given all the wars he has been in and a few years ago he'd have taken Coyle apart who is not much better than domestic level. He's already lost to two domestic fighters.

Coyle's not any better than domestic level.

For once I agree with you. I was probably being generous.

He's only getting built up because of Luke Campbell.

Campbell v Coyle is a horrible mismatch. Fortunately Campbell more boxer than beast, but there is no way in hell that Coyle even keeps it close. He's a brave kid and has talent, but he's just not on the same level, it's a cynical money maker....

World class?

Baboon wrote:Campbell v Coyle is a horrible mismatch. Fortunately Campbell more boxer than beast, but there is no way in hell that Coyle even keeps it close. He's a brave kid and has talent, but he's just not on the same level, it's a cynical money maker....

It's a step up for Campbell, there's nothing wrong with the fight.

tony1234 wrote:Coyle v Campbell coming to a PPV screen next year

Sadly looks quite true.

Sideshed Eddie already has it in the works I suspect a few mismatches to keep them ticking over.

Horse wrote:

Baboon wrote:Campbell v Coyle is a horrible mismatch. Fortunately Campbell more boxer than beast, but there is no way in hell that Coyle even keeps it close. He's a brave kid and has talent, but he's just not on the same level, it's a cynical money maker....

It's a step up for Campbell, there's nothing wrong with the fight.

Is it really a step up though?

ShadrachSimmo wrote:

tony1234 wrote:Coyle v Campbell coming to a PPV screen next year

Sadly looks quite true.

Sideshed Eddie already has it in the works I suspect a few mismatches to keep them ticking over.

If that fight is PPV then I'll hand back my Sky subscription.

lefty wrote:

Horse wrote:

Baboon wrote:Campbell v Coyle is a horrible mismatch. Fortunately Campbell more boxer than beast, but there is no way in hell that Coyle even keeps it close. He's a brave kid and has talent, but he's just not on the same level, it's a cynical money maker....

It's a step up for Campbell, there's nothing wrong with the fight.

Is it really a step up though?

OK, horrible mismatch is probably a bit strong, but I dont think it's a step up. It's a passable learning fight for Campbell, but Coyle provides no real threat - however if they werent both from Hull it wouldnt be happening and it's the fact that it's being built up as some kind of 'event' (and therefore by default a fight that either could win) that gets my goat.

Not sure where all this talk of mismatch is coming from? Coyle is a good pro with a lot more experience than Campbell. Also higher in the British rankings. Campbell would be favourite, but I dont think it would be a walk in the park for him. If Campbell was fighting Matthews, Cardle or Flanagan next they would be good fights for him, but Coyle would also have a good shot at any of those guys-he was giving Mathews a beating until he walked onto a shot.

Not sure where all this talk of mismatch is coming from? Coyle is a good pro with a lot more experience than Campbell. Also higher in the British rankings. Campbell would be favourite, but I dont think it would be a walk in the park for him. If Campbell was fighting Matthews, Cardle or Flanagan next they would be good fights for him, but Coyle would also have a good shot at any of those guys-he was giving Mathews a beating until he walked onto a shot.

They are both up in the ratings so a fight between them would be a possibility regardless of the Hull connection.

jameswilson wrote:I know people will say that was an early one but he did look very unsteady on his legs to me and had he been allowed to go on he really could have taken some shots.

I cant see many people arguing that Katsidis should have been allowed to continue,it was as correct a stoppage as possible,stunning left hand from Coyle,he'll probably never land a more flush shot the rest of his career

You gotta feel for Katsidis,its never nice seeing a warrior,shot and gettng blitzed early but hopefully he'll never fight again


Campbell was very impressive too and to get Brizuela outta there in 5 is good work indeed,i thought Brizuela could have continued personally but there wasnt many complaints so i suppose the ref was right

lefty wrote:Is it really a step up though?

A small one.

Finch wrote:

Baboon wrote:

tony1234 wrote:Coyle v Campbell coming to a PPV screen next year

I'm laughing.....but with the full (and sad) expectation that it could happen...

As I just said, Coyle is domestic level so PPV is a joke.

Bellew and Cleverly are domestic level......

Let's get real this will be PPV if Cleverly Bellew has any success

Will be stacked card with decent names in fights where they will be at least 1/10 with bookies to win