BoxRec

I must say, signed up for allegedly the other day, and money well spent, lots of classic fights, and good coverage of domestic and international fights on rerun, not to mention Pacman v Algieri which I will be watching later.

Ok, so the studio bits are very grating to say the least, bordering on juvenile, but overall, very good channel.

Yeah let's vote with our feet. There will definitely be ways to catch it online live, or else watch the action tomorrow on DailyMotion or Youtube.

If I could pay £5 to watch such an event online or through my NOW TV box I'd be happy to. But not £17. In theory, Nox Bation would be much better value (recently increased to £12 a month) if only Wrank Farren had a better stable. They're still likely to do great numbers this month especially with the handbags between Eubank Jr and BJ Saunders added to the Fury Chisora rematch

Parson Cross wrote:You will all cave in - but will you all fess up ?

I ain't cracking. Our lass is making me go see that new Hunger Games film instead. Maybe I shouldn't fess up to that :(

I aint cracking !!!!

Then again i dont have sky tv !!

187 wrote:It's an evenings entertainment for £16 bargain

Money isn't the issue mate, I've already spent 4 times the PPV amount buying (admittedly a sh!tload of) beers & takeaway for tonight. It's not like many of us can't afford 17 quid, the problem is the precedent it will set if we all buy such a sub-standard event.

Boxerbeetle wrote:

187 wrote:It's an evenings entertainment for £16 bargain

Money isn't the issue mate, I've already spent 4 times the PPV amount buying (admittedly a sh!tload of) beers & takeaway for tonight. It's not like many of us can't afford 17 quid, the problem is the precedent it will set if we all buy such a sub-standard event.

So are you not going to watch any standard sky sports boxing shows in future either? If you are then your stance is purely financial IMO.

187 wrote:

Boxerbeetle wrote:

187 wrote:It's an evenings entertainment for £16 bargain

Money isn't the issue mate, I've already spent 4 times the PPV amount buying (admittedly a sh!tload of) beers & takeaway for tonight. It's not like many of us can't afford 17 quid, the problem is the precedent it will set if we all buy such a sub-standard event.

So are you not going to watch any standard sky sports boxing shows in future either? If you are then your stance is purely financial IMO.

I don't follow that logic at all. Of course I'm going to watch standard Sky Sports boxing shows, that's the main reason I pay a fvcking subscription every month. This card is simply a few standard shows combined into one show & charged at a premium, any idiot can see that.

Treat the cause not the symptom

187 wrote:Treat the cause not the symptom

The cause is greed, the symptom is us being ripped off with shite like this being on PPV.

expe wrote:

187 wrote:Treat the cause not the symptom

The cause is greed, the symptom is us being ripped off with shite like this being on PPV.

And who's responsible for the greed?

In the past I've chipped in with my mates for practically all the big PPV's and had some great nights. But they were big event's Naz, Hatton, Lewis, big fights in the states etc. This is just a piss take IMO, maybe I'd cough up a fiver but that's about it. Bad thing is if it does sell well, this will be the sign of things to come and I think people pay enough for Sky as it is.

187 wrote:

expe wrote:

187 wrote:Treat the cause not the symptom

The cause is greed, the symptom is us being ripped off with shite like this being on PPV.

And who's responsible for the greed?

Sky/Eddie Hearn

For the cause of that, see Rupert Murdoch and Barry Hearn

Who says it's £16 ?

It's £21 if you book now.

Boxerbeetle wrote:

187 wrote:It's an evenings entertainment for £16 bargain

Money isn't the issue mate, I've already spent 4 times the PPV amount buying (admittedly a sh!tload of) beers & takeaway for tonight. It's not like many of us can't afford 17 quid, the problem is the precedent it will set if we all buy such a sub-standard event.

Yes, I can afford it, but on principle, I will not pay a premium for what is a domestic dust up - certainly not one of this calibre. It's a good fight, possibly will be as good as the first one, but that does not mean it should command a bloody 17 quid price tag, - that is ludicrous.

Hopefully, this dies on it's arse, and we don't have this becoming a regular affair.

I wonder whether Sky are paying less out for fights now - maybe this is a reason why this fight is PPV, I am guessing also both fighters are looking for a big payday as well. I haven't followed the build up, so I've no idea what the purses are, there must be an element of PPV money contributing I'd have thought?

If a superstore decide to sell a product at a much higher price than it's known worth do you avoid that product or avoid that store.

It's sad that I'm not surprised that there are so many spineless people on here. That being the case we can look forward to more domestic level boxing on PPV in the near future.

187 wrote:If a superstore decide to sell a product at a much higher price than it's known worth do you avoid that product or avoid that store.

Avoid the product, if they offer me a bargain in the future I'd be stupid not to take it, cutting your nose off to spite your face otherwise.

187 wrote:If a superstore decide to sell a product at a much higher price than it's known worth do you avoid that product or avoid that store.

Depends on how often they overcharge, only a mug keeps going to a shop that overcharges for everything.

I've not had a sky subscription for 2 years. I'll happily pay for allegedly as it's a dedicated boxing channel, I don't really follow other sports enough to pay for Sky Sports, and then pay on top for their fights.

Sklar wrote:It's sad that I'm not surprised that there are so many spineless people on here. That being the case we can look forward to more domestic level boxing on PPV in the near future.

Quite right. I do have some sympathy for those who have crumbled - it's tough following a niche sport at the best of times - but if the 'hardcore' fans start paying for this sh!t, there's just no realistic future for boxing tv coverage outside of PPV.

All I'm saying is that I don't understand how you can make a stand against the ppv but not against the organisation responsible for it. That's financial IMO and not principle.

Speaking of allegedly, have you seen how they are showing Bellew v Cleverley 1 Uncut tonight? Apologies if this has been mentioned elsewhere

Anyone who can get internet on their TV, or even plug the laptop in then it is on here. Cheap pay site I have used for years. Good for footy etc. Cost you 2.99 for the day, or 6 for 2 months, http://www.sebstreams.com/

187 wrote:All I'm saying is that I don't understand how you can make a stand against the ppv but not against the organisation responsible for it. That's financial IMO and not principle.

Which organisation are you talking about?

DaveyH wrote:Speaking of allegedly, have you seen how they are showing Bellew v Cleverley 1 Uncut tonight? Apologies if this has been mentioned elsewhere

I did notice that, made me laugh. Can imagine FW saying "this'll show em".

187 wrote:All I'm saying is that I don't understand how you can make a stand against the ppv but not against the organisation responsible for it. That's financial IMO and not principle.

I don't subscribe to Sky.