BoxRec

Horse wrote:

daviddee wrote:How can Brook be above Khan go have a look at their last 13 opponents

Porter whitewashed Alexander and is a much better win for Brook than Khan's against Alexander.

Khan's overall record is much better than Brook's, but Brook's win against Porter is way better than anything that Khan has done in the last 3 years.

I wouldn't be surprised if Khan could beat Porter much more clearly than Brook did, or even beat Brook comfortably next year. He has to actually do it though, his current ranking can't be based on what he did 4 or 5 years ago.

Horse wrote:

brian13 wrote:Your card means nothing compared to the official cards.

Yes, it does.

brian13 wrote:Yet, you have Paul Smith low on the rankings despite him getting robbed in Germany. Why isn't he in the top 10 based on your logic then.

Because that is not the consensus opinion and it was a close fight.

It wasn't a robbery, I just thought Smith deserved to nick it.

Horse wrote:

brian13 wrote:Your card means nothing compared to the official cards.

Yes, it does.

Horse wrote:I don't think Groves looked anywhere near as bad in his last two fights as people say.

slapbangwhallop wrote:What idiotic bullshit.

You obviously never watched the Lee-Korobov fight.

I won't be commenting on these ratings again. Worthless.

davie wrote:Porter beat Alexander fairly comfortably. Khan whitewashed Alexander.
Some were surprised Brook got the decision against Porter.

But "he beat him and he beat the other guy" seldom tells the full story

It was the nature of the dominance of Alexander that impressed me, no one has done that to Devon. Not Bradley, Porter, maidana, matthyssee, Witter. The guys been in with some top class opposition and Khan done him, absolutely done him. that happened a couple of weeks ago and that's what I'm basing my decision on.

Naandrew wrote:Good post though I would fancy Porters chances of stopping Khan we will never find out though.

Horse wrote:

davie wrote:Porter beat Alexander fairly comfortably. Khan whitewashed Alexander.
Some were surprised Brook got the decision against Porter.

But "he beat him and he beat the other guy" seldom tells the full story

It was the nature of the dominance of Alexander that impressed me, no one has done that to Devon. Not Bradley, Porter, maidana, matthyssee, Witter. The guys been in with some top class opposition and Khan done him, absolutely done him. that happened a couple of weeks ago and that's what I'm basing my decision on.

Porter whitewashed Alexander as well. Khan wasn't really any more impressive against Alexander than Porter was.

handsofstone wrote:Both Bradley and Porter basically roughed Alexander up and made things uncomfortable at a pace Devon didnt like whereas Khan gave him a boxing lesson

All deserved wins over Alexander but no doubt Amir's was the most impressive

Yes We Can wrote:

handsofstone wrote:Both Bradley and Porter basically roughed Alexander up and made things uncomfortable at a pace Devon didnt like whereas Khan gave him a boxing lesson

All deserved wins over Alexander but no doubt Amir's was the most impressive

Bradleys was the most impressive for me, nobody had done it before and it was seen as 2 of the top 3 guys in the division and almos certainties to be P4P stars later down the line.

Porters was unexpected, people knew he was decent but i dnt think anybody truly thought he could do that to a world level guy.

davie wrote:am not 'avin that

handsofstone wrote:Both Bradley and Porter basically roughed Alexander up and made things uncomfortable at a pace Devon didnt like whereas Khan gave him a boxing lesson

All deserved wins over Alexander but no doubt Amir's was the most impressive

los2 wrote:

handsofstone wrote:Both Bradley and Porter basically roughed Alexander up and made things uncomfortable at a pace Devon didnt like whereas Khan gave him a boxing lesson

All deserved wins over Alexander but no doubt Amir's was the most impressive

he was unbeaten against bradley.........a world champ against bradley and porter............

Horse wrote:

mullenman wrote:Sturminster clearly beat Martin that night in Germany

It wasn't a clear win for Sturm which is one of the main reasons the fight was a draw.

mullenman wrote:amir should also be ahead of kell

Porter is better than Alexander. Brook should be above Khan.

mullenman wrote:

Brook should be above Khan

Amir beat Alexander, Collazo,Judah,maidanna,Malinaggi,kotelnik, Barrera,Diaz
Brook beat around two world champs ( I like Brook but I think Amir should be ahead of him),

mullenman wrote:you have to beat the champion and he did not win seven rounds on anybodies card

mullenman wrote:Amir beat Alexander, Collazo,Judah,maidanna,Malinaggi,kotelnik, Barrera,Diaz
Brook beat around two world champs ( I like Brook but I think Amir should be ahead of him),

mullenman wrote:Also Del boy is not a world class heavyweight, just a gatekeeper, I also think he would not sell a fight out in his back garden anymore either

Aye, that's pretty much how I had it

Brook above Khan? I can understand why you would see it like that

forcefraser wrote:Kid Galahad should be higher than Paul Smith. Smith beaten every time he stepped up.

Horse wrote:

forcefraser wrote:Kid Galahad should be higher than Paul Smith. Smith beaten every time he stepped up.

Galahad has never fought anyone worth a damn.

He's boring. He doesn't deserve a high ranking.

Fat Git wrote:Horse only concocts these ratings to annoy our Irish posters - I have to say this is hilarious.

Horse wrote:

Fat Git wrote:Horse only concocts these ratings to annoy our Irish posters - I have to say this is hilarious.

Galahad isn't Irish.

Fat Git wrote:Trained and managed by an Irishman though.


Lee is though - you should have stuck to your guns on that one Horse, born in London and based in London - how Irish is he according to you?