Page 3 of 3
Posted: 16 Jun 2004, 15:43
by bennie
AlexY2K4 wrote:silkov wrote:AlexY2K4 wrote:Well, I never said Calzaghe was great, but he could very well turn out to be as long as he gets the proper fights.
I still don't like Johnson though, and I really hope Calzaghe beats him up badly if they ever fight.
Your comment that you hope Calzaghe beats Johnson up badly is pathetic to be honest mate!.... perhaps you should switch to watching WWF Wreastling!.
Pathetic!? Don't tell me that they are in this sport to tickle each other and have tea partys in little wendy houses!
Get real dude, in this sport they hurt each other and that is what I want Calzaghe to do to Johnson.
I don't like Johnson and I hope he gets smashed, if you have an issue with that, that's your problem.
Why do you dislike Johnson so much?
Posted: 16 Jun 2004, 15:45
by kevo
Cos he's backed him to win so many times

Posted: 16 Jun 2004, 15:47
by bennie
Can't understand how anyone could dislike a great pro who's paid his dues to make it.
Posted: 16 Jun 2004, 15:49
by REAL_DEAL
bennie wrote:Can't understand how anyone could dislike a great pro who's paid his dues to make it.
Like Roy jones Jr

Posted: 16 Jun 2004, 16:01
by silkov
AlexY2K4 wrote:silkov wrote:AlexY2K4 wrote:Well, I never said Calzaghe was great, but he could very well turn out to be as long as he gets the proper fights.
I still don't like Johnson though, and I really hope Calzaghe beats him up badly if they ever fight.
Your comment that you hope Calzaghe beats Johnson up badly is pathetic to be honest mate!.... perhaps you should switch to watching WWF Wreastling!.
Pathetic!? Don't tell me that they are in this sport to tickle each other and have tea partys in little wendy houses!
Get real dude, in this sport they hurt each other and that is what I want Calzaghe to do to Johnson.
I don't like Johnson and I hope he gets smashed, if you have an issue with that, that's your problem.
He won't get smashed by your joe cause 'Cotton wool' Calzaghe is running scared mate!....... he's already bottled it......... so grow up little boy!
Posted: 16 Jun 2004, 16:13
by Eric the Viking
Matchfixer wrote:I assume this is the same Derrick Harmon who recently turned down the opportunity for a beating from David Haye.
Harmon is a lanky light-heavy, and has no business at cruiser. He took a beating in his one outing at cruiser vs. O'Neil Bell, but has since gotten in shape and back together with his longtime trainer, and looked pretty good in his recent win over David Telesco.
You forgot to explain away Johnson's win over Harding - but I'm sure you have some way of making it go away. "Harding was never the same after Jones and Tarver smashed him..." or something along those lines. True, he looked less than great vs. Johnson - but perhaps Johnson deserves a bit of the credit for that.
Funny thing is, if one "analyzes" Chicken Calzaghe's re'sume' in the same kind of fashion as you do Johnson's, it's all the more laughable. And that's ignoring the long list of contenders at 168 Joe has studiously avoided. You can't hardly lose to 'em if you never get in the ring with 'em, can you?
Posted: 16 Jun 2004, 16:21
by AlexY2K4
He won't get smashed by your joe cause 'Cotton wool' Calzaghe is running scared mate!....... he's already bottled it......... so grow up little boy!
What's the little boy bit in aid of? Is it because I don't agree with you?
Posted: 16 Jun 2004, 16:33
by Matchfixer
Eric the Viking wrote:Matchfixer wrote:I assume this is the same Derrick Harmon who recently turned down the opportunity for a beating from David Haye.
Harmon is a lanky light-heavy, and has no business at cruiser. He took a beating in his one outing at cruiser vs. O'Neil Bell, but has since gotten in shape and back together with his longtime trainer, and looked pretty good in his recent win over David Telesco.
You forgot to explain away Johnson's win over Harding - but I'm sure you have some way of making it go away. "Harding was never the same after Jones and Tarver smashed him..." or something along those lines. True, he looked less than great vs. Johnson - but perhaps Johnson deserves a bit of the credit for that.
Funny thing is, if one "analyzes" Chicken Calzaghe's re'sume' in the same kind of fashion as you do Johnson's, it's all the more laughable. And that's ignoring the long list of contenders at 168 Joe has studiously avoided. You can't hardly lose to 'em if you never get in the ring with 'em, can you?
David Telesco? Whose he!
I'll give credit to Johnson for his win over Harding. Harding is also a vevry good boxer.
I agree with your statement about Calzaghe. I obviously have different criteria for what is world class.
I don't dislike Johnson as a person or even as a boxer. I was just not overly convinced by what I saw in the two fights against Clinton Woods.
Posted: 16 Jun 2004, 17:44
by MightyWarrior
Eric the Viking wrote:Compare Johnson's last 20 opponents with Calzaghe's - the disparity in quality is simply massive.
That's bollocks. You're falling over yourself in your efforts to praise Johnson - impressive, unlucky, top contenders, robbed - it's quite obvious you'd like to have this man's babies by the sounds of it, but please be realistic.
How are any of the following Calzaghe opponents so hugely inferior
to Johnsons? Answer = They're not.
Don't let your hatred of Calzaghe blind you to the facts...........now take a deep breath.
Ottke - Brewer
Vanderpool, Branco and Sheika - Veit, Starie,Sheika
Thomas Ulrich - Sobot
Harmon and Gonzalez - Mitchell & Eubank
Daniel Judah - Jiminez
Harding - Reid
Woods - Woodhall
Posted: 17 Jun 2004, 00:32
by Sprint
Looks like theres some truth to this, as it seems FW's not too happy. From the Sun;
PROMOTER allegedly has told Glen Johnson he will fight him in court after the American snubbed an extra £150,000 to box Joe Calzaghe.
Warren is furious IBF world light-heavyweight champ Johnson backed out of a re-scheduled bout when the original was postponed after Calzaghe injured his back.
Johnson has turned down around £300,000 because he wants to fight former champion Roy Jones Junior.
Warren said: “It’s all in the hands of my legal team.”
Posted: 17 Jun 2004, 04:39
by AlexY2K4
I don't know who Johnson thinks he is. He can't just mess people about like that, giving someone a title shot, then spitting his dummy out because Calzaghe got injured. (Calzaghe might not be injured, but hey, he also might be)
Posted: 17 Jun 2004, 04:49
by bennie
AlexY2K4 wrote:I don't know who Johnson thinks he is. He can't just mess people about like that, giving someone a title shot, then spitting his dummy out because Calzaghe got injured. (Calzaghe might not be injured, but hey, he also might be)
It wasn't Johnson who pulled out of a genuine world title fight at seven days' notice. That dropped everyone in the shit. Then the second date was mooted for Calzaghe's own backyard in Cardiff (from Manchester). The champion quite rightly wanted more money for fighting Calzaghe there.
At the end of the day, Johnson had whipped himself into fantastic shape while Calzaghe was out shagging a 21-year-old. He's decided not to risk all that hard work again on someone as unreliable as Calzaghe.
Posted: 17 Jun 2004, 05:04
by Kilburn
MightyWarrior wrote:
Thomas Ulrich - Sobot
This is the only comparison I'd disagree with, Ulrich is much better than that IMO. But overall you can't say Johnson has that much of a superior record to Calzaghe, if it all.
Erik you've gone a bit too far this time! Pull your dick out of Glencoffe and try to be
a little bit neutral for gods sake.
Posted: 17 Jun 2004, 05:10
by Kilburn
Eric the Viking wrote:Harmon is a lanky light-heavy, and has no business at cruiser. He took a beating in his one outing at cruiser vs. O'Neil Bell, but has since gotten in shape and back together with his longtime trainer, and looked pretty good in his recent win over David Telesco.
Yes, I believe Harmon has still got a bright future at 175. He's got bags of natural ability.
Must get around to watching the second half of the Telesco fight some time.
Posted: 17 Jun 2004, 05:33
by MightyWarrior
Kilburn wrote:MightyWarrior wrote:
Thomas Ulrich - Sobot
This is the only comparison I'd disagree with, Ulrich is much better than that IMO. But overall you can't say Johnson has that much of a superior record to Calzaghe, if it all.
Erik you've gone a bit too far this time! Pull your dick out of Glencoffe and try to be
a little bit neutral for gods sake.
I know, I ran out of names by then
But yes, just trying to make the point Erik was going overboard with that particular point. Plus Joe beat that lot fairly convincingly, apart from Reid.
Posted: 17 Jun 2004, 05:38
by knockout artist
Sprint wrote:Looks like theres some truth to this, as it seems FW's not too happy. From the Sun;
PROMOTER allegedly has told Glen Johnson he will fight him in court after the American snubbed an extra £150,000 to box Joe Calzaghe.
Warren is furious IBF world light-heavyweight champ Johnson backed out of a re-scheduled bout when the original was postponed after Calzaghe injured his back.
Johnson has turned down around £300,000 because he wants to fight former champion Roy Jones Junior.
Warren said: “It’s all in the hands of my legal team.”
In the hands of his legal team, what, Stephen fornicating Heath, come on the blokes an in house lawyer. If he was a top guy he'd be with a City firm, but he's not, he's in house at Sports Network.
Warren failed to deliver the fight on the agreed date because his boy cried off with a back injury, which are difficult to prove, medically.
Johnson has not agreed to a rescheduled bout, nor is he obliged to.
End Of Story.
Try and buy some other mugs title. Johnsons is not for sale.
Posted: 17 Jun 2004, 08:58
by {amateur}
Calzghe is world class but he is absolutley no way great or the best at his division and never was!
Posted: 17 Jun 2004, 09:16
by silkov
AlexY2K4 wrote:He won't get smashed by your joe cause 'Cotton wool' Calzaghe is running scared mate!....... he's already bottled it......... so grow up little boy!
What's the little boy bit in aid of? Is it because I don't agree with you?
I called you a little boy because you are behaving like a child disrespecting a honest and gutsy man who has never been given a break in his life... and who you have never even met!. Support who you like but try and be a bit more mature about it!.
Posted: 17 Jun 2004, 09:22
by Kilburn
smelly smelly poo pants.
Posted: 17 Jun 2004, 09:28
by kevo
Kilburn wrote:smelly smelly poo pants.
My Dad's bigger than your Dad!
Posted: 17 Jun 2004, 09:42
by jamesmcdonnell
My mum's bigger than your dad. Imagine how big my dad must be.
Posted: 17 Jun 2004, 09:46
by kevo
jamesmcdonnell wrote:My mum's bigger than your dad. Imagine how big my dad must be.
Not as big as my Mum! Ha!
Posted: 18 Jun 2004, 15:57
by stujones
Fightnews are reporting a date of September the 25th for Johnson vs Jones Jnr - Although knowing Roy Jones, there are still some issues that need to be clarified (i.e. will Jones mind not entering the ring last). However, its certainly not looking good for the July date in Cardiff for Calzaghe vs Johnson.
Posted: 18 Jun 2004, 16:17
by Eric the Viking
stujones wrote:Fightnews are reporting a date of September the 25th for Johnson vs Jones Jnr - Although knowing Roy Jones, there are still some issues that need to be clarified (i.e. will Jones mind not entering the ring last).
The entry order was an issue in the first Jones/Tarver fight because Jones had *vacated* his light-heavy titles and won a title at heavyweight, i.e. he argued that Tarver wasn't the "real" light-heavy champ. Eventually though, he relented and Tarver was introduced as the light-heavy champ, which he was. In this case there should be no "who's the real champ" issue - Jones lost fair and square to Tarver in his last fight, and Johnson is the legitimate IBF beltholder. It's possible there will be some issues over money, but somehow I don't foresee any kind of Jones/Tarver-style wrangling. Johnson has had a long and fine career (multiple hometown robbery losses notwithstanding), and these two seem to respect and have no animosity toward each other. As Jim McDonnell pointed out, the incentive for Jones is that the IBF belt would give him a better bargaining position for a potential rubber match with Tarver, and Johnson will likely earn far more than he would've vs. Calzaghe. Sounds like a win/win to me.