Page 3 of 5
Re: Terry Flanagan v Steve Ormond
Posted: 14 Feb 2015, 18:46
by Baboon
Got Flanagan 1,2,5 and Ormond 3 & 4
48-47 F
Flanagan needs to keep using his feet, far more effective. As soon as he goes toe to toe, Ormond is the boss.
Re: Terry Flanagan v Steve Ormond
Posted: 14 Feb 2015, 18:47
by Boxing Prospect
Incredibly close fight, 3-2 either way through 5 or even 2-2-1
Re: Terry Flanagan v Steve Ormond
Posted: 14 Feb 2015, 18:48
by reggaereggae
,I think the majority of Flanaghan's shots are getting blocked on the gloves.
Facially Ormond looks old though
Re: Terry Flanagan v Steve Ormond
Posted: 14 Feb 2015, 18:48
by Baboon
Boxing Prospect wrote:Incredibly close fight, 3-2 either way through 5 or even 2-2-1
Agree. Going to be interesting to see who fades first. Style wise it should be Flanagan, but he has some engine.
Re: Terry Flanagan v Steve Ormond
Posted: 14 Feb 2015, 18:49
by The Insider
Ormand for the stoppage!!!!
Close fightyet. yet
Re: Terry Flanagan v Steve Ormond
Posted: 14 Feb 2015, 18:52
by Baboon
6th Ormond, 7th Flanagan. 67-66 F. Close rounds again though. Ormond landing bigger single shots, but Flanagan has the volume.
Re: Terry Flanagan v Steve Ormond
Posted: 14 Feb 2015, 18:52
by GlobalBox
Sounds a good fight no pics yet for me is it 10 or 12 rounds guys
Re: Terry Flanagan v Steve Ormond
Posted: 14 Feb 2015, 18:52
by Boxing Prospect
Could well have had 2 or 3 even rounds now...great stuff...Hey Matchroom, this is what fans want!
Re: Terry Flanagan v Steve Ormond
Posted: 14 Feb 2015, 18:52
by Andrew
Nothing in this championship rounds are going to decide it.
Re: Terry Flanagan v Steve Ormond
Posted: 14 Feb 2015, 18:53
by Baboon
GlobalBox wrote:Sounds a good fight no pics yet for me is it 10 or 12 rounds guys
12 according to allegedly.
Re: Terry Flanagan v Steve Ormond
Posted: 14 Feb 2015, 18:56
by expe
Level after 8 on my card.
Re: Terry Flanagan v Steve Ormond
Posted: 14 Feb 2015, 18:56
by Boxing Prospect
Odds closing now, brilliant fight...so much action
Re: Terry Flanagan v Steve Ormond
Posted: 14 Feb 2015, 18:57
by reggaereggae
I actually think Ormond in ahead by a couple or more rounds. He blocks most of Flannagan's shots
Re: Terry Flanagan v Steve Ormond
Posted: 14 Feb 2015, 18:57
by GlobalBox
Baboon wrote:GlobalBox wrote:Sounds a good fight no pics yet for me is it 10 or 12 rounds guys
12 according to allegedly.
Thanks mate
Re: Terry Flanagan v Steve Ormond
Posted: 14 Feb 2015, 18:58
by Baboon
Ormond losing the head here. Stuck the nut in twice. Point off for the first one.
Re: Terry Flanagan v Steve Ormond
Posted: 14 Feb 2015, 18:58
by Boxing Prospect
Very harsh point deduction...referee is fornicating this up especially considering the fact he hasn't been warning Flanagan for the holding...AWFUL officiating again in a British ring!
Re: Terry Flanagan v Steve Ormond
Posted: 14 Feb 2015, 19:01
by expe
Boxing Prospect wrote:Very harsh point deduction...referee is effing this up especially considering the fact he hasn't been warning Flanagan for the holding...AWFUL officiating again in a British ring!
Not scoring that, bullshit point deduction, Flanagan can hold him all he wants, sticks the head in and a point comes off, situations like this I wouldn't blame Ormond if he chinned Steve Gray.
Re: Terry Flanagan v Steve Ormond
Posted: 14 Feb 2015, 19:01
by Baboon
Boxing Prospect wrote:Very harsh point deduction...referee is effing this up especially considering the fact he hasn't been warning Flanagan for the holding...AWFUL officiating again in a British ring!
Yes, he should have dealt with the holding. He probably deserved a point off by the thrid time he stuck the head in, but a warning for the 1st one would have made more sense.
Re: Terry Flanagan v Steve Ormond
Posted: 14 Feb 2015, 19:01
by Andrew
Boxing Prospect wrote:Very harsh point deduction...referee is effing this up especially considering the fact he hasn't been warning Flanagan for the holding...AWFUL officiating again in a British ring!
Was three times could have been DQ'd
Re: Terry Flanagan v Steve Ormond
Posted: 14 Feb 2015, 19:02
by Boxing Prospect
Naandrew wrote:Boxing Prospect wrote:Very harsh point deduction...referee is effing this up especially considering the fact he hasn't been warning Flanagan for the holding...AWFUL officiating again in a British ring!
Was three times could have been DQ'd
True but taking a point for the first one was stupid, and continuing to allow the holding wasn't helping matters...
Re: Terry Flanagan v Steve Ormond
Posted: 14 Feb 2015, 19:03
by Baboon
87-83 to Flanagan (with the point off).........christ he's just been Dq'd
Re: Terry Flanagan v Steve Ormond
Posted: 14 Feb 2015, 19:04
by expe
Steve Gray has cost Ormond that fight, Ormond should knock him cold now, one rule for one and a different one for the other, fornicating fuming at that. Gray, IJL, Edwards and O'Connor shouldn't be allowed to officiate in a British ring again.
Re: Terry Flanagan v Steve Ormond
Posted: 14 Feb 2015, 19:04
by Baboon
Just watched that last one again. Blatant. What a tool. He was still in the fight.
Re: Terry Flanagan v Steve Ormond
Posted: 14 Feb 2015, 19:05
by reggaereggae
Flanagan is always first to hold.
Re: Terry Flanagan v Steve Ormond
Posted: 14 Feb 2015, 19:05
by ShadrachSimmo
Very disappointing from Ormond he was still well in the fight when he started all the bullsh1t with the head.
Flannigan was taking over though and prob a few rounds ahead.