Page 3 of 3
Re: Fighters who are better than their record:
Posted: 29 Mar 2015, 06:06
by ImranSarwar
-I might be better than my record- was a lm/llm/ active Oct. 88- Oct. 92 (if I call the record of Opp line a **down que....then.. My down que first 8 Opp at THEIR HEIGHT has combined record of 94-4-2). BoxRec has me at sm though......I count it up MYSELF as 1 = jm 8 = m 3 = sm [lines 1..(incorrect weights listed), 4 & 10] lh = 1. I was 23-15-1 amateur (11+) (3-). ****I'm STARTED on a comeback too/3.1.13 and took it thru early Feb. 14./what I plan to go back just//at the moment I have one LAW PROBLEM [US has one LAW PROBLEM as I see it, now.....]. LOOKING TO MAKE A TRUE INROAD AND COMMUNICATE SOMEWHERE "Comprehensively". My age 58 + 7 mo. but I'm in very good shape for my age. Only serious (860)515-7680 (Cell phone)
Re: Fighters who are better than their record:
Posted: 29 Mar 2015, 09:36
by Boxerbeetle
Sergey Khomitsky falls nicely into this category, as British prospects & promoters are now finding out to their peril.
Re: Fighters who are better than their record:
Posted: 29 Mar 2015, 10:39
by Davestr
Gabriel Rosado comes to mind when I read this question.
Man, Gabriel is a true warrior and a great fighter but his record says otherwise:
21-9-13
Re: Fighters who are better than their record:
Posted: 01 Apr 2015, 10:15
by palooka
Boxerbeetle wrote:Sergey Khomitsky falls nicely into this category, as British prospects & promoters are now finding out to their peril.
Good call
he's certainly not in there to make up the numbers.
I always thought John Buster Keeton was better than his record also Peter Buckley didn't try for a win against 100's of opponents, if he had his record would have been quite different.