BoxRec

Perseus wrote:Running so much is the reason Peterson did not win and did not deserve to win.
Decision was for Garcia was correct.

This is where i stand

kidbazooka1 wrote:114 114 is bs.


Danny won that fight clearly.

You are talking shite. 114 114 was fair

A fighter can move excessively yet deserve to win a round. I don't know why some people seem to think that if someone 'runs' all other factors are meaningless.

Also, I can't type very well tonight

macaca wrote:

kidbazooka1 wrote:114 114 is bs.


Danny won that fight clearly.

You are talking shite. 114 114 was fair

cuz Garcia clearly won means Im talking shiit?

Ok

He did not win clearly

Edited by mod

macaca wrote:He did not win clearly, retard.

He clearly won

Was it a competitive fight yes but Garcia won it

Edited by mod

He won about as clearly as Andy Lee, huh?

Go away.

[quote="diddy"]He won about as clearly as Andy Lee, huh?

Go away.[/quote

Edited by mod

Tell me how did Danny win that fight "CLEARLY"?
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.

You fornicating cannot.

I did not see the Lee fight yet.

macaca wrote:Tell me how did Danny win that fight "CLEARLY"?
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.

You effing cannot.

I did not see the Lee fight yet.

Some ppls children.


Danny won that fight 115 113

You might wanna go back and do your own rd by rd for yourself champ.

Why, 114 114, shall I do it again and again and get 114 114. Bed time for you. Night night treasure kiss kiss x

You have to excuse some boxing fans, they are generally not the brightest crayons in the box. Some dont know the definition of "clearly". You'll have to excuse their middle school education and Taco Bell occupation.

crusader wrote:A fighter can move excessively yet deserve to win a round. I don't know why some people seem to think that if someone 'runs' all other factors are meaningless.

Also, I can't type very well tonight

Key word: excessively.
Some running is ok. It happens.
Excessive running is unacceptable, boxing is a combat sport not a race.
Peterson's running was excessive and excessive running does indeed trump all other factors.
He was not "moving" he was not exhibiting good ring generalship he was just running away from his opponent.

Perseus wrote:

crusader wrote:A fighter can move excessively yet deserve to win a round. I don't know why some people seem to think that if someone 'runs' all other factors are meaningless.

Also, I can't type very well tonight

Key word: excessively.
Peterson's running was excessive and excessive running does indeed trump all other factors.
He was not "moving" he was not exhibiting good ring generalship he was just running away from his opponent.
Boxing is a combat sport not a race.

Excessive can just mean that he was moving more than was optimal. How does that justify no other factors being considered when scoring a round? The bit about boxing not being a race is ridiculous, as it's not like Peterson wasn't hitting Garcia and avoiding punches while he was supposedly running.

Saying that someone deserves to lose just because of their movement is inane.

If any fight could'v had 4 or 5 even rounds scored it was this one. And even in the negative sense. Too many rounds with Garcia being an ineffective aggressor and Peterson basically being defensive and missing jabs. Peterson showed in the Khan fight he can be a highly effective aggressor . . .and he showed in the latter rounds here as well. Hell, Garcia was so out of gas towards the end Peterson could've maybe stopped him if he'd started coming forward earlier. But Peterson has no-one to blame but himself.

What an awful fight. I had it 115 - 113 LP but would never want to watch him again. Feather-fisted and running. DG is going downhill should not have won.

Just finished it. Ughh…not a fun fight to watch. i scored it 114-114. Both guys looked like crap.

Garcia the least impressive 30-0 reigning champ you will see. I just dont think he's that good.

ruin795 wrote:What an awful fight. I had it 115 - 113 LP but would never want to watch him again. Feather-fisted and running. DG is going downhill should not have won.

I don't think he is going downhill mate, (he is far from my favourite boxer too), BUT I think he had a fornicating shitty day at the office and was lucky he didn't get fired... certainly interesting will be his next fight

diddy wrote:Garcia the least impressive 30-0 reigning champ you will see. I just dont think he's that good.

That's a pretty bold statement in light of what he was able to do to Khan (whom people overrate on what he did to lousy Collazo and Alexander) and what he did to Matthyse who easily dispatched the man he struggled with tonight in Peterson.

macaca wrote:

ruin795 wrote:What an awful fight. I had it 115 - 113 LP but would never want to watch him again. Feather-fisted and running. DG is going downhill should not have won.

I don't think he is going downhill mate, (he is far from my favourite boxer too), BUT I think he had a effing shitty day at the office and was lucky he didn't get fired... certainly interesting will be his next fight

After an impressive win against Matthysse (who I thought would wipe the floor with Garcia) he IMO lost to Herrerra and now LP

crusader wrote:

Perseus wrote:

crusader wrote:A fighter can move excessively yet deserve to win a round. I don't know why some people seem to think that if someone 'runs' all other factors are meaningless.

Also, I can't type very well tonight

Key word: excessively.
Peterson's running was excessive and excessive running does indeed trump all other factors.
He was not "moving" he was not exhibiting good ring generalship he was just running away from his opponent.
Boxing is a combat sport not a race.

Excessive can just mean that he was moving more than was optimal. How does that justify no other factors being considered when scoring a round? The bit about boxing not being a race is ridiculous, as it's not like Peterson wasn't hitting Garcia and avoiding punches while he was supposedly running.

Saying that someone deserves to lose just because of their movement is inane.

It can mean that but that just is not what he was doing.
It was not just "movement" it was blatant running.
Try all you want but you can't justify your guy blatantly running and good luck finding judges who give rounds to blatant runners.
They gave him the rounds he won, the close scorecards show that but he didn't win enough rounds to deserve the win.

Do you think they have a clock to so they can see how many laps the boxers can do around the ring in three minutes?
Saying boxing is a combat sport not a race is not ridiculous it is an indisputable fact.
Boxing is not a race period.
Peterson did a good job of making a lot rounds look like a track meet tonight.

Lucas couldn't see for most of the fight retard. KBB

KBB wrote:

diddy wrote:Garcia the least impressive 30-0 reigning champ you will see. I just dont think he's that good.

That's a pretty bold statement in light of what he was able to do to Khan (whom people overrate on what he did to lousy Collazo and Alexander) and what he did to Matthyse who easily dispatched the man he struggled with tonight in Peterson.

He caught a guy with a weak beard after badly losing the early rounds. Khan has since changed his fighting tactics. If they fought again tmrw I suspect it would be different.

Garcia doesnt look great lately. He lost to Herrera. He arguably lost tonight. He seems to have already hit his peak and is on the downtrend. Time will tell. Good fighter. Not great. I'd like to see a rematch of this fight tonight. One in which Peterson fights the entire fight like he did the 2nd half - coming forward.

macaca wrote:Lucas couldn't see for most of the fight retard. KBB

Really? Do you honestly believe that is true? I saw the fight and he could see fine, sure his eye puff up a bit but they were able to manage the swelling and he was able to see fine, it was not totally closed.

Stop making excuses retard.