Page 3 of 3
Re: SLOW, Boring Time in Boxing
Posted: 12 Jul 2015, 06:53
by caldo2025
I decided to give the UFC a try last night because the Thurman fight didn't have me enthralled and i'll tell you what, I haven't been that entertained in a long time by a boxing card. Each match was amazing. Blood and guts is not a must for me but each of the bouts last night included one or both guys faces covered in blood. The crowd was electric and i just had a fantastic time watching and felt $60 I paid was worth every penny unlike the way I feel after watching a boxing PPV event. Great job UFC. Still a boxing first fan but i'll not miss another one of those.
Re: SLOW, Boring Time in Boxing
Posted: 12 Jul 2015, 10:57
by amwsnw
The thurman fight was worth watching. As was the undercard.
Re: SLOW, Boring Time in Boxing
Posted: 14 Jul 2015, 08:18
by world ranked
amwsnw wrote:The thurman fight was worth watching. As was the undercard.
Agreed the Collazo had a chance to get Thurman out of there. Nobody thought that was possible before the fight. The ending tp Nelson-Harrison was good.
Re: SLOW, Boring Time in Boxing
Posted: 14 Jul 2015, 09:28
by Boxing Prospect
Hyun vs Park was the fight of the weekend! The teen won't go far but he'll be fun watching crash and burn.
Re: SLOW, Boring Time in Boxing
Posted: 14 Jul 2015, 22:57
by ClivePatrickLyons
Re: SLOW, Boring Time in Boxing
Posted: 15 Jul 2015, 05:28
by cocka09
diddy wrote:Cock,
Gonna take a crazy, super wild guess.
You're British?
No.
Re: SLOW, Boring Time in Boxing
Posted: 15 Jul 2015, 06:50
by dagilechia
08/14 in Newark Huck vs Glowacki for the WBO criuser belt, televised in the US
Re: SLOW, Boring Time in Boxing
Posted: 15 Jul 2015, 08:05
by world ranked
dagilechia wrote:08/15 in Newark Huck vs Glowacki for the WBO criuser belt, televised in the US
Isnt Glowacki a blown up lt heavy?
Re: SLOW, Boring Time in Boxing
Posted: 15 Jul 2015, 10:49
by dagilechia
world ranked wrote:dagilechia wrote:08/15 in Newark Huck vs Glowacki for the WBO criuser belt, televised in the US
Isnt Glowacki a blown up lt heavy?
He's not, never fought in LHW (his career lowest weight was 193 1/4 lbs) natural cruiser, a southpaw with quite decent punch. It's a better opponent for Huck than Larghetti imo, who won some 3-4 rounds against Marco so i believe Glowacki should give him even more troubles.
Re: SLOW, Boring Time in Boxing
Posted: 15 Jul 2015, 17:59
by world ranked
dagilechia wrote:world ranked wrote:dagilechia wrote:08/15 in Newark Huck vs Glowacki for the WBO criuser belt, televised in the US
Isnt Glowacki a blown up lt heavy?
He's not, never fought in LHW (his career lowest weight was 193 1/4 lbs) natural cruiser, a southpaw with quite decent punch. It's a better opponent for Huck than Larghetti imo, who won some 3-4 rounds against Marco so i believe Glowacki should give him even more troubles.
Mixed him up with Pawel Glazewski
