Page 3 of 3
Re: Do anyone think JMM would've beaten DLH??
Posted: 20 Jul 2015, 17:13
by caldo2025
tiny_acres wrote:caldo2025 wrote:Badhusker wrote:
If JMM is over-rated, it doesn't make Pacquiao look great, because a lot of people thought JMM won all of their fights, and proved he was the best in the last one. Other than Pac, Bradley, and Floyd, I can only think of one or two fights he lost. Pretty good group to have an L to. Regardless, he is definitely a hall of fame guy, and will be remembered as great
JMM is the definition of a pu55y and has no honor.
Your total disrespect for any boxer yet alone an ATG like JMM.Is the true definition of being
a total Pu55y.Your posts are a waste of space and you truly have no respect for the sport of boxing.
Tell me why JMM's an ATG, Mr Boxing? Don't read or respond to my posts if you dislike them so much. You lonely or something? Find something to do with yourself instead. If you want to have an honest conversation then tell me why I'm wrong about JMM? Give me some of your thoughts backed by facts and i'll reconsider my opinion as I've done several times here before when faced with some good points I haven't considered. But if you want to keep responding like a 5th grader, I urge you to ignore me and my posts because I have not time for idiots.
Re: Do anyone think JMM would've beaten DLH??
Posted: 20 Jul 2015, 17:27
by jamesmcdonnell
I'll give you just one reason, there are others.
Marquez was shafted in at least one, in many people's opinion's two, and in my opinion three of his fights with Pacquaio. I was actually sat ringside reporting on their first fight, and on my scorecard, I gave Marquez 10 straight rounds after the second, he boxed his head off.
Whatever your opinion of that draw, and their next two fights, he pushed Pacquaio into deep waters into all three fights, and then threw everything into their last figuring he would never get the decision if it went to the cards. Considering that Pacquaio is supposedly an ATG, that alone, no matter any of his other achivements, shows how good a fighter he was/is.
He had a bit of a slow career, because his manager made some terrible decisions on his behalf, putting him in low profile bouts when he should have been
Marquez has only ever been beaten in world title fights by top quality operators, and aside from Mayweather, was never outclassed - but then Mayweather outclasses everyone. To say he has no honour is ridiculous. He got shafted by the judges each time he fought Paquiao and already fought him 4 times - I won't be surprised if they both have one last fight anyway, as they are both close to retirement.
Re: Do anyone think JMM would've beaten DLH??
Posted: 20 Jul 2015, 17:33
by Tomasino
KBB wrote:I was basically talking about the same Oscar that Manny faced. I laugh when people say sparring means nothing, obviously i can tell when people never been in the ring before.
There's no way that JMM wouldn't have had a chance if both the smaller Forbes and Valero were successful.
The only ring you've been in is your favourite transvestite hooker's. You've been proven a moron so often on here I can't believe you still post

Re: Do anyone think JMM would've beaten DLH??
Posted: 21 Jul 2015, 10:18
by KBB
Tomasino wrote:KBB wrote:I was basically talking about the same Oscar that Manny faced. I laugh when people say sparring means nothing, obviously i can tell when people never been in the ring before.
There's no way that JMM wouldn't have had a chance if both the smaller Forbes and Valero were successful.
The only ring you've been in is your favourite transvestite hooker's. You've been proven a moron so often on here I can't believe you still post

It figures we'd have some idiot that only comes here to hurl lame insults but not talk boxing. Next time you want to fight send your garbage in a PM.