Page 3 of 3
Re: Would You Bet a Month's Wages on Fury?
Posted: 28 Jul 2015, 15:07
by brilo33
i think fury took the punch well. though he did claim he hit like his mother.
Re: Would You Bet a Month's Wages on Fury?
Posted: 28 Jul 2015, 15:15
by taffytoon
keithmoonhangover wrote:ILikeBeer wrote:keithmoonhangover wrote:Or benefits for those in need of gainful employment.
Any takers?
Why ask this? Fury isn't going to win.
Some people think he is. I don't think Horse has a job, but if he did, he'd bet on him.
He is the oldest rent boy known to man; he gets 50p a pop.
Re: Would You Bet a Month's Wages on Fury?
Posted: 28 Jul 2015, 16:09
by magwitch
No mara. Fury hold no upper hands in terms of strength, athleticism, "smarts" or experience. If they were both 25 then I'd give Fury a chance because of his traveler upbringing - but Klitschko should have bought enough tee-shirts by now to be able to nullify him. In fact, if he doesn't stop Fury, then I'd be disappointed from his point of view.
Re: Would You Bet a Month's Wages on Fury?
Posted: 28 Jul 2015, 16:15
by keithmoonhangover
jamesmcdonnell wrote:7-2 on to win.
So you'd be happy to wager say 3000 to win less than 1000, and potentially lose the lot if he got done in a freak injury?
That looks like very attractive odds to me. Nowt the matter with betting odds on.

Re: Would You Bet a Month's Wages on Fury?
Posted: 28 Jul 2015, 16:29
by Noxy
I don't know about that. I meant that I give Tyson an outside chance of pulling it off this time. If Fury is as crazy as he appears it may actually stand him in good stead for this fight. After all what right-thinking person would fancy their chances against Wlad in Germany. On the one hand, I'm not convinced Fury isn't going to go out there and take it to the cobbles (and get chinned). On the other hand, if he brings a sound gameplan and sees it through, it could get interesting.[/quote]
Well, if you give him a 20% chance of winning, that's 1 time in 5, if you give him 25% then it's one in 4 - worth looking at it that way when trying to compare odds being offered, to actual chance of winning.
It sounds to me like you don't actually rate his chances anywhere near as high as your own numbers suggest.
Let's be honest, it wouldn't matter if they fought on the moon, Tyson's chances are very slim because he is nowhere near as good as Wlad.[/quote]
Sure, I understand it sounds like that. To be fair, I rate Tyson's chances at somewhere around that mark to the extent that I would back it with a few quid (although not a month's wages). Anyway, percentages aside I give Tyson a better chance than the vast majority of people on this forum going by the posts I've read. To me Tyson is the best match out there for Wlad apart from Wilder and that's why I'm going to the fight. Why? Because of his "craziness" as I mentioned before. He's also bigger than Wlad and younger plus he can really fight. Someone posted on this forum about how people were only giving Tyson a prayer because he's a Brit. I actually think a lot of people put Tyson down because he's a Brit - he's overweight, a traveller, brawler etc.
This is selling Fury short, yes he used to be overweight and yes McDermott did get robbed against him. But Tyson's not like that anymore, he's been outclassing his opponents recently and he's been getting better. Tyson is now a legitimate world class heavyweight and he has a 1 in 4 (or thereabouts) chance of giving Klitschko all kinds of trouble (maybe even winning). We can analyse their techniques and past records all we want (and we will) and Klitschko comes out better than the Furious One every time. However, in my opinion, this fight has enough intangibles about it to be worth a flutter at somewhere around those odds.
I could have this wrong, it wouldn't be the first time and I'm sure it won't be the last either. Nevertheless, I'm putting this out on boxrec now. To me, Tyson is a live opponent and he's going to Germany to get that belt. He's not just being thrown to Klitschko and getting paid very nicely for it.
Re: Would You Bet a Month's Wages on Fury?
Posted: 28 Jul 2015, 16:31
by handsofstone
Fury might be younger,fresher,faster and maybe even technically better than Klitschko but Wlad is just so effective at what he does that for over a decade he can nullify whatever his opponents will bring to the ring
Tyson's size and reach do make this fight interesting though,If Klitschko cant lean on Fury then thats a start and even better if Fury can use his feet to keep Wlad from holding,maybe switch southpaw then you never know
I dont think Fury will get tagged like he did against Cunningham,i sense a more sensible approach from him,i know the Abell fight was more recent but i suspect that has more to do with Fury's motivation,eccentricity or whatever you want to call it
if anything i suspect Fury might just not be experienced enough to dethrone Wlad yet and loses on points,closely
TBF I change my mind on a daily basis,8 out of 10 times i see Klitschko winning but as i said in the opening paragraph,Fury might just be a better boxer than Klitschko and barring him getting KO'd he might just shock everyone and stay switched on like he did against Chisora and Johnson and use his reach and lateral movement to eek out a decision
Re: Would You Bet a Month's Wages on Fury?
Posted: 28 Jul 2015, 16:33
by Boxerbeetle
WTF is all this talk about Fury being 'crazy'?
How has he ever shown himself to be crazy? And even if he was, how the fvck would it help him against Wlad?
Re: Would You Bet a Month's Wages on Fury?
Posted: 28 Jul 2015, 16:36
by Noxy
jamesmcdonnell wrote:Noxy wrote:No, but I don't think it's a foregone conclusion for Wlad either. I'm going and I wouldn't go if I thought it was a mismatch. I'd give Tyson a 20-25% chance. Tbh I couldn't see myself putting a month's wages on Fury but give me some crazy odds and I might be tempted. Nothing ventured etc.
Generous indeed. You think he wins between 1 of 4 times against Wlad?
I don't know about that. I meant that I give Tyson an outside chance of pulling it off this time. If Fury is as crazy as he appears it may actually stand him in good stead for this fight. After all what right-thinking person would fancy their chances against Wlad in Germany. On the one hand, I'm not convinced Fury isn't going to go out there and take it to the cobbles (and get chinned). On the other hand, if he brings a sound gameplan and sees it through, it could get interesting.[/quote]
Well, if you give him a 20% chance of winning, that's 1 time in 5, if you give him 25% then it's one in 4 - worth looking at it that way when trying to compare odds being offered, to actual chance of winning.
It sounds to me like you don't actually rate his chances anywhere near as high as your own numbers suggest.
Let's be honest, it wouldn't matter if they fought on the moon, Tyson's chances are very slim because he is nowhere near as good as Wlad.[/quote]
Sure, I understand it sounds like that. To be fair, I rate Tyson's chances at somewhere around that mark to the extent that I would back it with a few quid (although not a month's wages). Anyway, percentages aside I give Tyson a better chance than the vast majority of people on this forum going by the posts I've read. To me Tyson is the best match out there for Wlad apart from Wilder and that's why I'm going to the fight. Why? Because of his "craziness" as I mentioned before. He's also bigger than Wlad and younger plus he can really fight. Someone posted on this forum about how people were only giving Tyson a prayer because he's a Brit. I actually think a lot of people put Tyson down because he's a Brit - he's overweight, a traveller, brawler etc.
This is selling Fury short, yes he used to be overweight and yes McDermott did get robbed against him. But Tyson's not like that anymore, he's been outclassing his opponents recently and he's been getting better. Tyson is now a legitimate world class heavyweight and he has a 1 in 4 (or thereabouts) chance of giving Klitschko all kinds of trouble (maybe even winning). We can analyse their techniques and past records all we want (and we will) and Klitschko comes out better than the Furious One every time. However, in my opinion, this fight has enough intangibles about it to be worth a flutter at somewhere around those odds.
I could have this wrong, it wouldn't be the first time and I'm sure it won't be the last either. Nevertheless, I'm putting this out on boxrec now. To me, Tyson is a live opponent and he's going to Germany to get that belt. He's not just being thrown to Klitschko and getting paid very nicely for it.
Re: Would You Bet a Month's Wages on Fury?
Posted: 28 Jul 2015, 16:40
by magwitch
Noxy wrote:I don't know about that. I meant that I give Tyson an outside chance of pulling it off this time. If Fury is as crazy as he appears it may actually stand him in good stead for this fight. After all what right-thinking person would fancy their chances against Wlad in Germany. On the one hand, I'm not convinced Fury isn't going to go out there and take it to the cobbles (and get chinned). On the other hand, if he brings a sound gameplan and sees it through, it could get interesting.
I could have this wrong, it wouldn't be the first time and I'm sure it won't be the last either. Nevertheless, I'm putting this out on boxrec now. To me, Tyson is a live opponent and he's going to Germany to get that belt. He's not just being thrown to Klitschko and getting paid very nicely for it.[/quote]
I think you do have it wrong. Provided Wladimir doesn't turn up with the sh*ts from food poisoning or a virus then he should have far too much for Fury. I like Fury, I don't know him personally but I do find him entertaining and interesting and honest. I think his size and his illegal use of the forearm had a lot to do with his win over Cunningham. He was impressive against Chisora but I really don't see how "balls to the wall" is going to be enough to beat a kid from Chernobyl who's grown up fratching with Vitali Klitschko.
Re: Would You Bet a Month's Wages on Fury?
Posted: 28 Jul 2015, 17:49
by jamiem26
I'll be having a punt on Fury to stop Wlad in rounds 7-12 - 12/1 ish I think. No big figures - been there/done that.
Going over so I'm choosing to be optimistic. He's got a lot better chance than many think.
Re: Would You Bet a Month's Wages on Fury?
Posted: 29 Jul 2015, 04:02
by ILikeBeer
Boxerbeetle wrote:WTF is all this talk about Fury being 'crazy'?
How has he ever shown himself to be crazy? And even if he was, how the fvck would it help him against Wlad?
I think people on here mistake talking shite for being crazy.