Re: Danny Garcia wont KO Malignaggi
Posted: 02 Aug 2015, 02:38
Al Heyman's a great matchmaker. 
Stupid posts like this make me wonder why I even post here. Dude is 31-0 with wins over LMM, Peterson and Khan and he's in danger of fading into obscurity.handsofstone wrote:I never seen than coming,caught me unawares but i'd never argue, Malignaggi was never in it,landed 2 punches the whole fight i remember but he threw at least double that![]()
Garcia was worst ive seen him if im honest,even though he never dropped a round and got a stopage,he was worse than he was against Herrera and Peterson
He should've performed a lot better tonight against opposition,he needs a proper test yet or he's in danger of fading into obscurity
I agree. No idea what they were seeing, and some of them are people whose opinion I generally respect.diddy wrote:And to think quite a few people gave Paulie a decent chance in this.
What a joke.
The problem of some boxing fans - they aren't intelligent thinkers. And are often blinded by personal biases or one-track thinking. One-track thinking like they don't like Garcia fighting Salka and winning close decisions vs Lamont and Herrera so their mind is overtaken by their heart and they want to see him lose - so because they want to see it they let their heart talk their mind into something that may be nonsensical, but they don't care. They want what they want - and it spills out into debates. That's the only logical explanation. Anyone who has watched Paulie lately should know he would have nothing for Garcia. And also know Paulie is nowhere near the level of Lamont Peterson. Forcrusader wrote:I agree. No idea what they were seeing, and some of them are people whose opinion I generally respect.diddy wrote:And to think quite a few people gave Paulie a decent chance in this.
What a joke.
I don't think Garcia is fading into obscurity, but I do believe that his stock has fallen among boxing fans.
Your one to talk diddly,all you do is moan and critisize fighters,you even started a thread last night about a fight being fixed then in your first sentence said it wasnt fixeddiddy wrote:Stupid posts like this make me wonder why I even post here. Dude is 31-0 with wins over LMM, Peterson and Khan and he's in danger of fading into obscurity.handsofstone wrote:I never seen than coming,caught me unawares but i'd never argue, Malignaggi was never in it,landed 2 punches the whole fight i remember but he threw at least double that![]()
Garcia was worst ive seen him if im honest,even though he never dropped a round and got a stopage,he was worse than he was against Herrera and Peterson
He should've performed a lot better tonight against opposition,he needs a proper test yet or he's in danger of fading into obscurity
F'n hell. This is piss poor commentary.
Yup. I agree. I would not count out Garcia against anyone at 147. I think Garcia's strength in general is underestimated. Plus he has good Boxing ability.Evander wrote:Garcia looked bigger.
Paulie's been showing signs of wear and tear for some time, brave gutsy guy though and a decent commentator so far.
Garcia is a capable boxer who has it in him to win strategic contests, it's hard to count him completely out against most top Welterweights on his day.
For sure, in fact when you start to look down Danny Garcia's resume and see a win over Matthysse, a KO of Khan and combine a number of other opponents together it's actually starting to look quite good for him.MachoTime wrote:Evander wrote:Garcia looked bigger.
Paulie's been showing signs of wear and tear for some time, brave gutsy guy though and a decent commentator so far.
Garcia is a capable boxer who has it in him to win strategic contests, it's hard to count him completely out against most top Welterweights on his day.
Yup. I agree. I would not count out Garcia against anyone at 147. I think Garcia's strength in general is underestimated. Plus he has good Boxing ability.