Page 3 of 3
Re: Fury v Klitschko
Posted: 14 Aug 2015, 09:04
by freddydoesdallas
Sometimes having someone’s word or handshake is not worth the paper it’s written on
some people say the same about a contract for payment
Re: Fury v Klitschko
Posted: 14 Aug 2015, 10:00
by samwbr
Adam Smith, Jonny Nelson and Ed Robinson all went over to the first press conference, they weren't just going for a jolly or a 30 second clip on Sky Sports News.
Re: Fury v Klitschko
Posted: 14 Aug 2015, 10:04
by rd350lc
mickey1975 wrote:You have to pay to watch telly in Germany anyway.
at least you only have to pay the once , sometimes 3 times in this country if its a ppv event , ie tv licensce , sky , ppv event
mind you , probably worth it to avoid dodgy rock band ringwalk music and crap /non existant undercards
Re: Fury v Klitschko
Posted: 14 Aug 2015, 10:35
by Benelio
rd350lc wrote: probably worth it to avoid dodgy rock band ringwalk music and crap /non existant undercards
They really do have absolutely no taste in music over there.
Re: Fury v Klitschko
Posted: 14 Aug 2015, 11:05
by Glass Joe
what you talking about, sven ottke coming out to right said fred was a classic
Re: Fury v Klitschko
Posted: 14 Aug 2015, 11:09
by Andrew
rd350lc wrote:mickey1975 wrote:You have to pay to watch telly in Germany anyway.
at least you only have to pay the once , sometimes 3 times in this country if its a ppv event , ie tv licensce , sky , ppv event
mind you , probably worth it to avoid dodgy rock band ringwalk music and crap /non existant undercards
Klitschko fight entrances are quality
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=kcSXhmm8xRo
Re: Fury v Klitschko
Posted: 14 Aug 2015, 11:19
by jamesmcdonnell
Glass Joe wrote:what you talking about, sven ottke coming out to right said fred was a classic
Wasn't that the reid fight?
Re: Fury v Klitschko
Posted: 14 Aug 2015, 11:22
by jamesmcdonnell
Naandrew wrote:rd350lc wrote:mickey1975 wrote:You have to pay to watch telly in Germany anyway.
at least you only have to pay the once , sometimes 3 times in this country if its a ppv event , ie tv licensce , sky , ppv event
mind you , probably worth it to avoid dodgy rock band ringwalk music and crap /non existant undercards
Klitschko fight entrances are quality
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=kcSXhmm8xRo
Holy shit!!! That is SOME entrance - (as I said to the Mrs the first time we met)
Re: Fury v Klitschko
Posted: 14 Aug 2015, 12:25
by reggaereggae
Re: Fury v Klitschko
Posted: 14 Aug 2015, 12:29
by Rexob
at least you only have to pay the once , sometimes 3 times in this country if its a ppv event , ie tv licensce , sky , ppv event
mind you , probably worth it to avoid dodgy rock band ringwalk music and crap /non existant undercards[/quote]
Klitschko fight entrances are quality
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=kcSXhmm8xRo[/quote]
Holy poo!!! That is SOME entrance - (as I said to the Mrs the first time I entered her!)
Re: Fury v Klitschko
Posted: 14 Aug 2015, 13:01
by jamesmcdonnell
Rexob wrote:at least you only have to pay the once , sometimes 3 times in this country if its a ppv event , ie tv licensce , sky , ppv event
mind you , probably worth it to avoid dodgy rock band ringwalk music and crap /non existant undercards
Klitschko fight entrances are quality
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=kcSXhmm8xRo[/quote]
Holy poo!!! That is SOME entrance - (as I said to the Mrs the first time I entered her!)
[/quote]
Yes, that's definitely the better line.
Re: Fury v Klitschko
Posted: 14 Aug 2015, 13:02
by Monte Fisto
This was an entrance that i'll never forget. More powerful if he was the underdog though.
Re: Fury v Klitschko
Posted: 14 Aug 2015, 13:03
by keithmoonhangover
Re: Fury v Klitschko
Posted: 19 Aug 2015, 08:44
by dookus
thecrab wrote:Klits migfht be 3" less than this dork with an abnormally long head
But he will destroy this pommie tosser in 2 rounds!
easily!
rack off boofhead
Re: Fury v Klitschko
Posted: 19 Aug 2015, 09:10
by jamesmcdonnell
thecrab wrote:Klits migfht be 3" less than this dork with an abnormally long head
But he will destroy this pommie tosser in 2 rounds!
easily!
I'm not sure why you're bothering with the pommie comment, given that most here give Fury bugger all chance.
Re: Fury v Klitschko
Posted: 19 Aug 2015, 09:14
by danamba7
jamesmcdonnell wrote:thecrab wrote:Klits migfht be 3" less than this dork with an abnormally long head
But he will destroy this pommie tosser in 2 rounds!
easily!
I'm not sure why you're bothering with the pommie comment, given that most here give Fury bugger all chance.
Don't let him get to ya, he spends his whole life going sideways.
Re: Fury v Klitschko
Posted: 19 Aug 2015, 09:25
by jamesmcdonnell
Oh I won't. Just thought it was a pretty dumbass thing to say.
Re: Fury v Klitschko
Posted: 21 Aug 2015, 09:33
by jamesmcdonnell
thecrab wrote:U poms are a sensitive bunch
At least we can play cricket.
Re: Fury v Klitschko
Posted: 21 Aug 2015, 09:41
by jamesmcdonnell
thecrab wrote:jamesmcdonnell wrote:thecrab wrote:U poms are a sensitive bunch
At least we can play cricket.
u have to go off topic?? smarten up pom!
I'm sorry, did I bowl you a googly there?
Not off topic, as we were discussing nationalistic traits, like endemic racism and xenophobia.
Re: Fury v Klitschko
Posted: 21 Aug 2015, 11:47
by jamesmcdonnell
thecrab wrote:There is a proven fact in boxing...'tall heavyweights don't have a chin'
This has been proven again and again over the years.
With the low calibre of fighters 'long head fury' has fought.
To the best and biggest puncher?
Wladimir tends to eff around and frustrate opponents with left jabs before he moves in for the kill.
I hope he dont bother with this pissant and just smash his giant face that he could not miss
Put these pissy little poms back to englandabad!
Define tall - Ali was 6' 3" - nothing wrong with his chin, Larry Holmes around the same. Foreman 6' 4", again great chin. Riddick Bowe was 6' 5" and had a very good chin. Vitali was 6' 7" and had an absolutely cast iron chin.
Englandabad? WTF are you on about?
Fury has no chance against Wlad, but it's not because of his height, it's because he just isn't very good.
