Page 3 of 4
Posted: 02 Jul 2004, 19:17
by adamiw
lirva33 wrote:More sharapova goodness....

damn, she'd scare the shit out of me in bed though. with those rabbit faces and grunts!
wouldn't say no though!!
Posted: 03 Jul 2004, 05:02
by glittermonkey
lirva33 wrote:
It's good to see the Wimbledon groundstaff are totally professional about working on the womens matches.

Posted: 03 Jul 2004, 12:36
by lirva33
Sharapova you beauty!!
Posted: 03 Jul 2004, 17:26
by Bard of Boxrec
do you people totally disregard the need for breasts?
she's eye candy, but only in the way you feel guilty about perving on some friend of a friend's younger sister who came along to a party because noone knew any beauties their age they could invite.
Posted: 03 Jul 2004, 17:33
by neil r
Riddick Blowe wrote:do you people totally disregard the need for breasts?

its womens tennis mate, the last things that takes part are actually women!
Posted: 03 Jul 2004, 17:35
by Bard of Boxrec
true, i suppose
thats probably why hingis trotting around the court was strangely appealing.
Posted: 06 Jul 2004, 13:36
by Eric the Viking
Riddick Blowe wrote:do you people totally disregard the need for breasts?

You boobmen are so narrow-minded. We legmen know that the boobs will grow in, but if you don't have a nice set of legs at 17, you never will.
And yeah, I like a nice pair of boobies as much as the next neanderthal, but in Serena's case, it's like someone glued a butt and a pair of boobs on a man - ugh.
Posted: 09 Jul 2004, 12:29
by THEBUTCH
Posted: 12 Feb 2006, 18:48
by lirva33
lirva33 wrote:
I have 10 quid on her to winthe tournament at 16/1!
man, THAT was a great bet!
Gotta love Maria!
Posted: 12 Feb 2006, 20:20
by Phenomenal-Nutrition
I was in love with Serena Williams, too muscular for some weeds, but a HW needs a woman who can fight and hump back a bit
'she looks like a man' 'no she doesn't she just has more muscle than the 2 OZ you have mate'

Posted: 12 Feb 2006, 21:10
by lirva33
nothing wrong with serena at all. I'd lodge that ass for 30 seconds (as long as id last)
http://www.hollywoodtuna.com/images/Serena.jpg
Posted: 13 Feb 2006, 04:28
by Maxime
Posted: 13 Feb 2006, 09:57
by jamesmcdonnell
I would definetly tap that ass....
Sharapova is nothing special at all, her figure isn't very nice, no tits, no arse, way too skinny and pretty plain looking.
Serena is a little too musclebound and not that pretty, but the view from the rear would be most satisfying.
Posted: 13 Feb 2006, 10:02
by Max Molyneux
TIMMAY! 8)
Posted: 13 Feb 2006, 10:06
by nickd
fornicate the curves, think of her forehand the girl could wank you off for hours without getting tired.
Posted: 13 Feb 2006, 12:09
by silkov
She's well known for her excellent service action!...

:x

8)

Posted: 13 Feb 2006, 14:36
by nickd
She's welcome to toss my balls in the air.

Posted: 13 Feb 2006, 14:38
by glahn
Gabriela Sabatini.
'Nuff said.
Posted: 13 Feb 2006, 15:05
by silkov
Posted: 13 Feb 2006, 15:50
by glahn
Posted: 13 Feb 2006, 15:51
by glahn
Ummm..
Posted: 13 Feb 2006, 15:57
by silkov
Posted: 13 Feb 2006, 16:13
by el_grande_mauro_mina
Maria Kirilenko
http://ameblo.jp/user_images/2b/b3/10002328693_s.jpg
Russia has a surplus of tall, beautiful blue eyed
natural blonde... now gimme the number for the aeroflot
flight ticket office

Posted: 13 Feb 2006, 16:39
by lirva33
Carlos has a great point about maria Kirilenko...
http://cache.wtnphotos.com/532/P1000271.jpg
However, Sharapova is #1. I cannot let her criticism stand.
Ass? Maria has a great ass for her size. Legs are complete quality and the tits are growing. Now, you can go out to a club and see a hotter girl most nights of the week. However, you can say that about any girl really. Sharapova has the total package IMO.
http://www.mariaworld.net/usopen052.jpg