Re: George Groves' biggest issue
Posted: 20 Sep 2015, 17:10
.
He was still high off a win 18 months earlier? Really??mrbassie wrote:I don't agree, I imagine that Booth and Groves spent years discussing how to beat Froch after their spar and had a good plan which Groves executed. Froch came in knowing he had the power to drop Groves and high on the Bute win, tried to steamroll him and walked onto one. From then on he was playing catch up. In the rematch, Froch boxed, it was fairly even throughout, Groves weakened late in the fight and Froch got him.pyenest77 wrote:The Groves that fought Froch in the first fight would have toyed with Jack for me.
Jack beat Groves with footwork. Jack's better than credited and Groves isn't quite as good as everybody thought after the first Froch fight is how I see it.
does cross dressing tire you out?...Counter-puncher wrote:i think its just as much mental as physical. if you are tense you tire more quickly, Groves seems to burn up quite a lot of nervous energy (especially in Froch 1 IMO)
Re-watched it the other night and I have to agree really. I thought otherwise before but I do think Groves was up at the time of the stoppage. He was certainly landing his jab more often and with more authority. The commentary is weird. They have Froch winning the first and I think it's Groves. I think they give Groves the second and I think it's Froch. George lands some good punches which push Carl back but he doesn't seem bothered. Carl jumps in with flurries of bodyshots which clearly land. When they show replay for some reason they show the ones George blocks rather than the ones that land. It's a strange broadcast.crusader wrote:To me they were generally rounds in which not much was happening but Groves was clearly doing a bit more, having an edge in connects with Froch not landing notable shots during that period. Froch picked it up as the fight progressed but even then I felt he was getting too much credit for his occasional bursts which pushed Groves back but were largely inaccurate in my view, and I challenge someone who believes that Froch controlled the bout with his jab to turn the sound off and direct me to footage of him doing this for prolonged periods.
I can understand a score of 4-3 Froch, but I strongly disagree with the position that Groves shouldn't have been ahead.