Page 3 of 3

Posted: 07 Jul 2004, 10:01
by Wilko
Didn't think it was - main reason being that Bunce wouldn't defend Warren so much.

It was just the addios thing...

Posted: 07 Jul 2004, 14:29
by lirva33
glittermonkey wrote:Yes, but we've also wasted pages discussing coconuts, giant Iraqi spiders, Dean Phillips' shorts, boxings worst haircuts and Lirva33's appalling betting record. So you shouldn't be all that touched.

As for $eif, at least he was positive about the sport and took the time to try and be pleasant to everyone. I guess they don't make trolls like they used to.
Appalling is a bit harsh :(

Posted: 07 Jul 2004, 14:32
by REAL_DEAL
lirva33 wrote:
glittermonkey wrote:Yes, but we've also wasted pages discussing coconuts, giant Iraqi spiders, Dean Phillips' shorts, boxings worst haircuts and Lirva33's appalling betting record. So you shouldn't be all that touched.

As for $eif, at least he was positive about the sport and took the time to try and be pleasant to everyone. I guess they don't make trolls like they used to.
Appalling is a bit harsh :(
remember we saved you from a 1000 on roy jones :D

Posted: 07 Jul 2004, 16:03
by Eric the Viking
glittermonkey wrote:Yes, but we've also wasted pages discussing coconuts, giant Iraqi spiders, Dean Phillips' shorts, boxings worst haircuts and Lirva33's appalling betting record. So you shouldn't be all that touched.
Now I concur the latter 3 topics were quite frivolous, but what have you got against coconuts and giant, erm, Iraqnids? Are you Iraqnophobic?

Posted: 07 Jul 2004, 16:14
by richter-scale
Eric the Viking wrote:
glittermonkey wrote:Yes, but we've also wasted pages discussing coconuts, giant Iraqi spiders, Dean Phillips' shorts, boxings worst haircuts and Lirva33's appalling betting record. So you shouldn't be all that touched.
Now I concur the latter 3 topics were quite frivolous, but what have you got against coconuts and giant, erm, Iraqnids? Are you Iraqnophobic?
Yeah, and if Dean's shorts are shite he has a right to be informed... :lol:

Posted: 07 Jul 2004, 16:52
by glittermonkey
Multiple apologies are in order, i believe.

Sorry Lirva, it's just you always seem to be losing. Just think, all the bad luck you've had has to even itself out eventually. My tip is try to bet on Warren's fighters. :TU:

Sorry Mr Robinson, but i reckon Dean already knows some of the shorts he wears are shocking. If only he applied the way he fights to the way he picks his shorts. Bring back Pele Reid, best shorts ever seen in a British ring.

Sorry ETV, believe me when i say, i have nothing against the spider population of Iraq. In fact i'm quite sure Iraq has some of the nicest spiders anywhere in the world. As long as they stay away from me then they'll be just fine. Coconuts, on the other hand........i'll sum up my feelings on that subject via the medium of emoticons:

:o :-? :x :evil: :( :cry: :oops:

Posted: 08 Jul 2004, 08:50
by Dynamite Dean Phillips
Please don't tell me my new ones are shite, they cost too much.

Posted: 08 Jul 2004, 09:04
by Slapsie Maxie
Dynamite Dean Phillips wrote:Please don't tell me my new ones are shite, they cost too much.
Do you pay the final installment when they are finished :D

Sorry, couldn't resist

Posted: 08 Jul 2004, 09:08
by Dynamite Dean Phillips
Slapsie Maxie wrote:
Dynamite Dean Phillips wrote:Please don't tell me my new ones are shite, they cost too much.
Do you pay the final installment when they are finished :D

Sorry, couldn't resist

:wink: well, at least I have generated some interest, if just with my shorts (or lack of).

I agree, my old ones weren't up to much, but the new ones are an improvement you must agree. :TU:

Posted: 08 Jul 2004, 09:53
by J
Dynamite Dean Phillips wrote:
Slapsie Maxie wrote:
Dynamite Dean Phillips wrote:Please don't tell me my new ones are shite, they cost too much.
Do you pay the final installment when they are finished :D

Sorry, couldn't resist

:wink: well, at least I have generated some interest, if just with my shorts (or lack of).

I agree, my old ones weren't up to much, but the new ones are an improvement you must agree. :TU:
TO QUOTE MY OLD MAN, I"IT AINT THE SIZE OF THE MAN IN THE FIGHT BUT THE FIGHT IN THE MAN"

similarly it "aint the shorts on the boxer but the boxer in the shorts!" :lol: :lol: :lol:

Posted: 08 Jul 2004, 09:54
by Dynamite Dean Phillips
J wrote:
Dynamite Dean Phillips wrote:
Slapsie Maxie wrote: Do you pay the final installment when they are finished :D

Sorry, couldn't resist

:wink: well, at least I have generated some interest, if just with my shorts (or lack of).

I agree, my old ones weren't up to much, but the new ones are an improvement you must agree. :TU:
TO QUOTE MY OLD MAN, I"IT AINT THE SIZE OF THE MAN IN THE FIGHT BUT THE FIGHT IN THE MAN"

similarly it "aint the shorts on the boxer but the boxer in the shorts!" :lol: :lol: :lol:

:TU: good one

Posted: 08 Jul 2004, 09:55
by jamesmcdonnell
Yes, originally "It's not the size of the dog in the fight, but the size of the fight in the dog."

Therefore, "It's not the size of the shorts on the dog,.....err, not wait, that's not it, oh bollocks, doesn't work does it?

Posted: 08 Jul 2004, 09:57
by J
cheers bro its a motto ive lived my life fomr to be honest, i know there are better but hey served me well playing rugby, but then i coudl always hide behind the ref!!! (typical scrum half) by the eway Deano do Lllanelli and my team (Bath) still play for th rag doll mate? Used to be great fixture that. Sorry for ignorance but Ive left the west country and its memories (i sued to go every year to this midweek fixture at the rec) far behind but I do still cherish them. :TU:

Posted: 08 Jul 2004, 09:59
by Dynamite Dean Phillips
J wrote:cheers bro its a motto ive lived my life fomr to be honest, i know there are better but hey served me well playing rugby, but then i coudl always hide behind the ref!!! (typical scrum half) by the eway Deano do Lllanelli and my team (Bath) still play for th rag doll mate? Used to be great fixture that. Sorry for ignorance but Ive left the west country and its memories (i sued to go every year to this midweek fixture at the rec) far behind but I do still cherish them. :TU:
You may want to check out the Scarlets Supporters Club forum:

http://www.rugbyrating.co.uk/forum/default.asp

Posted: 08 Jul 2004, 10:01
by J
http://www.bathrugby.co.uk/

s'ok ive got this one :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: 8) :TU:

Posted: 08 Jul 2004, 12:53
by dondada
Undoubtedly the worst shorts in domestic boxing are Oscar Hall's. Looks like he's forgotten his PE kit and the teacher has made him wear some far too small for him.

In other shorts trivia, when I went to see Hatton recently, someone told me his shorts cost £800!

Surely not...

Posted: 08 Jul 2004, 13:00
by Slapsie Maxie
In other shorts trivia, when I went to see Hatton recently, someone told me his shorts cost £800!

Surely not...[/quote]

Nope, it was his opponent that cost that much

Posted: 08 Jul 2004, 13:05
by knockout artist
Slapsie Maxie wrote:In other shorts trivia, when I went to see Hatton recently, someone told me his shorts cost £800!

Surely not...
Nope, it was his opponent that cost that much[/quote]

Hattons shorts are bloody awful and Michael Gomez shorts are worse. They are illegal in actual fact because they go below the knee.

Posted: 08 Jul 2004, 13:08
by REAL_DEAL
i saw hattons shorts in a glass picture case signed by him when i was in manchester, looked nice.

Posted: 08 Jul 2004, 13:18
by knockout artist
REAL_DEAL wrote:i saw hattons shorts in a glass picture case signed by him when i was in manchester, looked nice.
Looked nice? Thats something his nan would say :wink:

I'm afraid tassles and long shorts look terrible on a bloke with milk pale skin.

Posted: 08 Jul 2004, 13:30
by kevo
Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:.

In other shorts trivia, when I went to see Hatton recently, someone told me his shorts cost £800!
Must have paid for them by the inch.