Page 3 of 3
Posted: 07 Jul 2004, 06:47
by jamesmcdonnell
As much as it can be viewed as an indulgence for the board, and yes I can see why some would see it this way due to the board's failings, it is also for the fighters, managers, promoters and press, to make them feel a part of something, I think that these events should be seen for what they are, trying to create a feelgood factor. I certainly think that they are worth reporting on as they are good for the sport.
Posted: 07 Jul 2004, 06:48
by jamesmcdonnell
Gatti Dorin will be shown still. It's next year we have to worry about, that's when we will find out just how much the Boxing coverage will atrophy.
Posted: 07 Jul 2004, 06:49
by dondada
shakermaker wrote:sounded like a good night to me! I'd have needed a large autograph book and camera!!!
Are the BEEB still showing Gatti/Dorin? Or is it just the Olympics for them now?
I could be kidding myself but I think they had a pic up of it with the date at the end of the Barrera-Ayala coverage. Hope they are.
Posted: 07 Jul 2004, 06:52
by shakermaker
I've accepted they're gonna pull the plug.
I've always said as soon as AH got the boot the rest would follow. The premiership highlights programme was the final nail in the coffin for boxing. Boxing for them was a cheap replacement while ITV still had the footie highlights.....plus they knew it'd attract a decent crowd.
I just hope ITV get interested
Posted: 07 Jul 2004, 06:57
by jamesmcdonnell
Why oh why won't ITV screen boxing again, it used to be one of their biggest draws, but they don't seem at all interested.
Posted: 07 Jul 2004, 07:01
by shakermaker
James, did you ever watch boxing first on ITV2 (then it was moved to their sports channel before it went bust)?
Bunce was on there and it was a really good show.........I got to Vargas/Mosley and other HBO shows nearly every 2 weeks. Good interviews with Larry Holmes. This was the kind of format I wanted the BBC to take.
Posted: 07 Jul 2004, 07:05
by jamesmcdonnell
Nah, never had ITV2. However, ITV used to have excellent boxing shows, before Football became the be all and end all of sports coverage.
Posted: 07 Jul 2004, 10:01
by bennie
chris s wrote:Heard it was shit do full of autograph hunters with speeches to send you to sleep. some guests were so bored that had gone by 10.30 to get lashed elsewhere so dare say he made the right choice not to go if invited.
Anyhow the money it cost the board could've been spent on helping ex boxers on hard times or towards a MRI machine
Chris, you can't have it both ways. First you say it was shit, then you say it was a lavish event.
It was neither. The Board hired an everyday catering company for the meal (friendly staff, tasty food), had a few bottles of bubbly at the reception (which was soon wolfed down), hired the City hall out - that's it. The people there made it: the boxers, the champions, the unsung heroes, the greats.
Two moments made it for me. 1) George Feeney told me Ray "Boom Boom" Mancini so hurt him to the body - broke his ribs in fact - that he was determined to have something to show for the 10-rounder (which he lost on points). He cleared £23,000 for the fight (a fortune in 1983), walked into an estate agents in his hometown of Hartlepool and bought the biggest house he could for the money. He still lives in the house.
2) Steve Sims slipped me a card which read: "Licenced fitness instructor: expert in all aspects of fitness and dietary techniques, specialising in cardiovascular regimes.
"Also a licenced doorman."
It was a celebration of them. Christ, if various governments can spend millions celebrating the 50th anniversary of D-Day last month (an absolute massacre), then the Board can spend a few quid celebrating their 75th birthday.
Posted: 07 Jul 2004, 10:04
by jamesmcdonnell
Hear Hear!
Posted: 07 Jul 2004, 10:06
by dondada
fornicating hell - in 1983 you could have bought the whole of Hartlepool for £23,000! God knows why you would want to though.
I should know...I'm from Darlington. 8)
Monkey hangers!

Posted: 07 Jul 2004, 18:42
by xtremebox
How can you compare the Boards (boreds) dinner with bloody D-Day? thousands of brave men died on D-day, apart from a few day's of the shits I don't think there were any casualities at the dinner.
Get it into prospective and don't be so disrespectful.
Posted: 07 Jul 2004, 18:53
by Matchfixer
xtremebox wrote:How can you compare the Boards (boreds) dinner with bloody D-Day? thousands of brave men died on D-day, apart from a few day's of the shits I don't think there were any casualities at the dinner.
Get it into prospective and don't be so disrespectful.
I concur.
Posted: 08 Jul 2004, 05:06
by KOJOE90
Well Bunce may noy have been there but he mentions it in his latest article.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/boxing/3872911.stm
Posted: 08 Jul 2004, 11:03
by kevo
xtremebox wrote:How can you compare the Boards (boreds) dinner with bloody D-Day? thousands of brave men died on D-day, apart from a few day's of the shits I don't think there were any casualities at the dinner.
Get it into prospective and don't be so disrespectful.
He wasn't being disrespectful, he was simply saying that if the Government can afford to spend millions on the D-Day celebrations, why can't the Board spend a couple of nicker on thier own celebrations. After all the government have used mone that should be used for the NHS, Schools etc, while the money the board spent money that could have been used to pay for MRI scans.
Posted: 08 Jul 2004, 11:09
by bennie
xtremebox wrote:How can you compare the Boards (boreds) dinner with bloody D-Day? thousands of brave men died on D-day.
I wish you'd been there.
Posted: 08 Jul 2004, 11:16
by jamesmcdonnell
Similar levels of carnage i presume?
Posted: 08 Jul 2004, 19:18
by xtremebox
Bennie, are you still on the SOR? Nudge Nudge!