Page 3 of 5
Re: PTBF 2016 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD
Posted: 08 Aug 2016, 08:39
by Badhusker
Kind of kicking myself for not submitting the last ptbf...would have kept me in the top 3 at least. I had picked Menayothin by close decision but forgot to submit it on one of my computers.

oh well, best of luck to the guys at the top. Some good fights coming before years end, so who knows...
Re: PTBF 2016 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD
Posted: 11 Sep 2016, 13:47
by asdfjkl
Badhusker wrote:Kind of kicking myself for not submitting the last ptbf...would have kept me in the top 3 at least. I had picked Menayothin by close decision but forgot to submit it on one of my computers.

oh well, best of luck to the guys at the top. Some good fights coming before years end, so who knows...
You're kidding right now right?
The real rankings, if everybody played from start of and would have used as much 2X and 3Xes as you, it would probably have been something like this:
1: theory
2: cletomex
3: Best Coast
4: Comegalletas
5: Gimp Mask
6: WadeGwynn
7: pete thebet
8: Kalan
9: hbg
10: Ally-M1
11: Cloutov
12: IRLangmaid25
13: davie
14: asdfjkl
15: Einherjar
16: Drinquor
17: HyacinthusTurnipseed
18: olij999
19: loki
20: armageto
21: Freedom2013
22: proslacker3
23: Idlamb
24: Lennox
25: Badhusker
Newest players and lower ranked players ignored.
Re: PTBF 2016 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD
Posted: 26 Sep 2016, 14:22
by gilgamesh
Lack of respect. This guy leaves my name out of a Top 26 list in spite of the fact that I've been Top 10 for the last several weeks.
Re: PTBF 2016 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD
Posted: 26 Sep 2016, 15:52
by asdfjkl
gilgamesh wrote:Lack of respect. This guy leaves my name out of a Top 26 list in spite of the fact that I've been Top 10 for the last several weeks.
I'll try to make a new one after the bra/cle fight. Somehow I don't expect much changes, the top three I had in my list were all correct again. You simply already used all of your 3* and 2* options and because of that have a far higher rank as you actually deserve to have. Also note that you (and me) will probably only end up lower, since Rodney and Jefe are also doing an excellent job atm.
Re: PTBF 2016 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD
Posted: 26 Sep 2016, 15:57
by gilgamesh
asdfjkl wrote:gilgamesh wrote:Lack of respect. This guy leaves my name out of a Top 26 list in spite of the fact that I've been Top 10 for the last several weeks.
I'll try to make a new one after the bra/cle fight. Somehow I don't expect much changes, the top three I had in my list were all correct again. You simply already used all of your 3* and 2* options and because of that have a far higher rank as you actually deserve to have. Also note that you (and me) will probably only end up lower, since Rodney and Jefe are also doing an excellent job atm.
I didn't see any fights throughout the remainder of the year worth keeping the bonuses around for. I doubt I'll win this year, but I think I can remain in the Top 10 throughout, and possibly get back into the Top 5.
Re: PTBF 2016 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD
Posted: 26 Sep 2016, 22:38
by asdfjkl
gilgamesh wrote:asdfjkl wrote:gilgamesh wrote:Lack of respect. This guy leaves my name out of a Top 26 list in spite of the fact that I've been Top 10 for the last several weeks.
I'll try to make a new one after the bra/cle fight. Somehow I don't expect much changes, the top three I had in my list were all correct again. You simply already used all of your 3* and 2* options and because of that have a far higher rank as you actually deserve to have. Also note that you (and me) will probably only end up lower, since Rodney and Jefe are also doing an excellent job atm.
I didn't see any fights throughout the remainder of the year worth keeping the bonuses around for. I doubt I'll win this year, but I think I can remain in the Top 10 throughout, and possibly get back into the Top 5.
That's oke, but that's why I wrote that if everybody would have joined from the start, and everybody used as much 2* and 3* as you and badhusker have used, the scores would have looked completely different. It's not like either of you has made that good predictions.
Re: PTBF 2016 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD
Posted: 27 Sep 2016, 00:44
by davie
asdfjkl wrote:Badhusker wrote:Kind of kicking myself for not submitting the last ptbf...would have kept me in the top 3 at least. I had picked Menayothin by close decision but forgot to submit it on one of my computers.

oh well, best of luck to the guys at the top. Some good fights coming before years end, so who knows...
You're kidding right now right?
The real rankings, if everybody played from start of and would have used as much 2X and 3Xes as you, it would probably have been something like this:
1: theory
2: cletomex
3: Best Coast
4: Comegalletas
5: Gimp Mask
6: WadeGwynn
7: pete thebet
8: Kalan
9: hbg
10: Ally-M1
11: Cloutov
12: IRLangmaid25
13: davie
14: asdfjkl
15: Einherjar
16: Drinquor
17: HyacinthusTurnipseed
18: olij999
19: loki
20: armageto
21: Freedom2013
22: proslacker3
23: Idlamb
24: Lennox
25: Badhusker
Newest players and lower ranked players ignored.
As long as I'm still kicking your sorry ass
Re: PTBF 2016 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD
Posted: 27 Sep 2016, 12:49
by asdfjkl
davie wrote:asdfjkl wrote:Badhusker wrote:Kind of kicking myself for not submitting the last ptbf...would have kept me in the top 3 at least. I had picked Menayothin by close decision but forgot to submit it on one of my computers.

oh well, best of luck to the guys at the top. Some good fights coming before years end, so who knows...
You're kidding right now right?
The real rankings, if everybody played from start of and would have used as much 2X and 3Xes as you, it would probably have been something like this:
1: theory
2: cletomex
3: Best Coast
4: Comegalletas
5: Gimp Mask
6: WadeGwynn
7: pete thebet
8: Kalan
9: hbg
10: Ally-M1
11: Cloutov
12: IRLangmaid25
13: davie
14: asdfjkl
15: Einherjar
16: Drinquor
17: HyacinthusTurnipseed
18: olij999
19: loki
20: armageto
21: Freedom2013
22: proslacker3
23: Idlamb
24: Lennox
25: Badhusker
Newest players and lower ranked players ignored.
As long as I'm still kicking your sorry ass
Both of you do actually, my score is still very fluctuating because I haven't played that much yet, next to that I only follow the heavyweights, so I have to make an estimated guess about all other leagues. In my calculation "realhorror" is the best of everyone, because he only played 1 match, predicted it pefect and on top of that used a 3x on it!
Re: PTBF 2016 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD
Posted: 27 Sep 2016, 14:09
by Tanzio
asdfjkl wrote:davie wrote:asdfjkl wrote:
You're kidding right now right?
The real rankings, if everybody played from start of and would have used as much 2X and 3Xes as you, it would probably have been something like this:
1: theory
2: cletomex
3: Best Coast
4: Comegalletas
5: Gimp Mask
6: WadeGwynn
7: pete thebet
8: Kalan
9: hbg
10: Ally-M1
11: Cloutov
12: IRLangmaid25
13: davie
14: asdfjkl
15: Einherjar
16: Drinquor
17: HyacinthusTurnipseed
18: olij999
19: loki
20: armageto
21: Freedom2013
22: proslacker3
23: Idlamb
24: Lennox
25: Badhusker
Newest players and lower ranked players ignored.
As long as I'm still kicking your sorry ass
In my calculation "realhorror" is the best of everyone, because he only played 1 match, predicted it pefect and on top of that used a 3x on it!
Everybody has an opinion. Yours just happens to be a rotten one.
Re: PTBF 2016 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD
Posted: 27 Sep 2016, 14:53
by asdfjkl
Tanzio wrote:asdfjkl wrote:davie wrote:
As long as I'm still kicking your sorry ass
In my calculation "realhorror" is the best of everyone, because he only played 1 match, predicted it pefect and on top of that used a 3x on it!
Everybody has an opinion. Yours just happens to be a rotten one.
I calculate it, it's not opinion based. If you don't like facts than that's your problem. Good luck crying in a corner, I don't mind.
Re: PTBF 2016 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD
Posted: 27 Sep 2016, 17:35
by Tanzio
asdfjkl wrote:Tanzio wrote:asdfjkl wrote:
In my calculation "realhorror" is the best of everyone, because he only played 1 match, predicted it pefect and on top of that used a 3x on it!
Everybody has an opinion. Yours just happens to be a rotten one.
I calculate it, it's not opinion based. If you don't like facts than that's your problem. Good luck crying in a corner, I don't mind.

crying in a corner?
Your statistical methodology sucks. That would be like giving the baseball batting average and homerun crown to a player who had one at bat for the entire season. Or, a basketball player winning the shooting % and scoring crown based on making the only shot he took for the season.
In other words, it makes zero sense. But, to each their own.
Re: PTBF 2016 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD
Posted: 02 Oct 2016, 17:42
by Badhusker
asdfjkl wrote:Badhusker wrote:Kind of kicking myself for not submitting the last ptbf...would have kept me in the top 3 at least. I had picked Menayothin by close decision but forgot to submit it on one of my computers.

oh well, best of luck to the guys at the top. Some good fights coming before years end, so who knows...
You're kidding right now right?
The real rankings, if everybody played from start of and would have used as much 2X and 3Xes as you, it would probably have been something like this:
1: theory
2: cletomex
3: Best Coast
4: Comegalletas
5: Gimp Mask
6: WadeGwynn
7: pete thebet
8: Kalan
9: hbg
10: Ally-M1
11: Cloutov
12: IRLangmaid25
13: davie
14: asdfjkl
15: Einherjar
16: Drinquor
17: HyacinthusTurnipseed
18: olij999
19: loki
20: armageto
21: Freedom2013
22: proslacker3
23: Idlamb
24: Lennox
25: Badhusker
Newest players and lower ranked players ignored.
You are a fornicating moron, and keep proving that over and over.
Re: PTBF 2016 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD
Posted: 03 Oct 2016, 11:58
by asdfjkl
Badhusker wrote:asdfjkl wrote:Badhusker wrote:Kind of kicking myself for not submitting the last ptbf...would have kept me in the top 3 at least. I had picked Menayothin by close decision but forgot to submit it on one of my computers.

oh well, best of luck to the guys at the top. Some good fights coming before years end, so who knows...
You're kidding right now right?
The real rankings, if everybody played from start of and would have used as much 2X and 3Xes as you, it would probably have been something like this:
1: theory
2: cletomex
3: Best Coast
4: Comegalletas
5: Gimp Mask
6: WadeGwynn
7: pete thebet
8: Kalan
9: hbg
10: Ally-M1
11: Cloutov
12: IRLangmaid25
13: davie
14: asdfjkl
15: Einherjar
16: Drinquor
17: HyacinthusTurnipseed
18: olij999
19: loki
20: armageto
21: Freedom2013
22: proslacker3
23: Idlamb
24: Lennox
25: Badhusker
Newest players and lower ranked players ignored.
You are a effing moron, and keep proving that over and over.
Lol, here are my new rankings
theory
cletomex
ElJefe
Comegalletas
Gimp Mask
Best Coast
hbg
cloutov
olij999
proslacker3
Woldemar
Kalan
HyacinthusTurnipseed
Ally-M1
davie
IRLangmaid25
Badhusker
T.M.K.
Einherjar
Drinquor
Freedom2013
diddy
armageto
gilgamesh
Idlamb
claudevsq
Heretic
JCS
Air Rodney
Ricky_
Loki
Lennox
pete thebet
thomasjkelley
joe strong
WadeGwynn
asdfjkl
rivado
Tanzio
hoagylt
boxing_rocks
ceramics_steve_again
PredatorHayds
lefty
lazboy
the rat
TheWigwam
crusader
franio
tomek0412
Re: PTBF 2016 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD
Posted: 12 Nov 2016, 09:25
by Badhusker
Wow, first time I picked perfect and dropped 7 spots, lol. I guess it was an easy pick for most to load up on if you could.

Re: PTBF 2016 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD
Posted: 18 Nov 2016, 12:56
by cletomex
Re: PTBF 2016 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD
Posted: 18 Nov 2016, 13:04
by asdfjkl
Badhusker wrote:Wow, first time I picked perfect and dropped 7 spots, lol. I guess it was an easy pick for most to load up on if you could.

This is why you raised in mine, but dropped in the real one. That's why you now probably realise how retarded your own comment was by calling me a moron. I predicted this beforehand. On top of that, many were lucky that there was one referee who's clearly bonkus, decision dominating made more sense.
Re: PTBF 2016 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD
Posted: 22 Nov 2016, 09:02
by davie
Well it's starting to look like I'm this lists version of RJJ.
One time undisputed no1, got spanked and now fighting on far too long and have fallen off a cliff in the rankings.
One more Enzo Maccarinelli and I'll be ready to chuck it.
Still spewing that I never backed Frampton and the decision to make the Pacquiao fight a 2x when I had no multipliers left
(I make excuses like a top fighter though)
Re: PTBF 2016 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD
Posted: 22 Nov 2016, 10:06
by Tanzio
asdfjkl wrote:Badhusker wrote:Wow, first time I picked perfect and dropped 7 spots, lol. I guess it was an easy pick for most to load up on if you could.

This is why you raised in mine, but dropped in the real one. That's why you now probably realise how retarded your own comment was by calling me a moron. I predicted this beforehand. On top of that, many were lucky that there was one referee who's clearly bonkus, decision dominating made more sense.
Start your own game or shaddap.
Re: PTBF 2016 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD
Posted: 27 Nov 2016, 13:30
by gilgamesh
Ouch. I have taken a hellacious nose dive in this thing. I'll be lucky to finish in the Top 20 at this rate.
Re: PTBF 2016 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD
Posted: 27 Nov 2016, 14:00
by HyacinthusTurnipseed
Can't believe I'm so close to the top, with a (super remote) chance of actually winning.
If only the only fight I missed hadn't been the easy as hell to pick Martin-Joshua fight. If I'm out of a higher place at the end of the season by 27 or less...
JCS wrote:
Is Hopkins-Smith the only fight fight left for this season? No Lebedev-Gassiev, Cuellar-Mares, Parker-Ruiz, Povetkin-Stiverne or Uchiyama-Corrales II?
Re: PTBF 2016 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD
Posted: 27 Nov 2016, 16:25
by JCS
HyacinthusTurnipseed wrote:
Is Hopkins-Smith the only fight fight left for this season? No Lebedev-Gassiev, Cuellar-Mares, Parker-Ruiz, Povetkin-Stiverne or Uchiyama-Corrales II?
Well, I definitely overlooked some late fights..
Re: PTBF 2016 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD
Posted: 05 Dec 2016, 19:11
by Tanzio
Uchiyama v Corrales II, January 31, 2016 to decide it all?
Re: PTBF 2016 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD
Posted: 05 Dec 2016, 22:57
by Tanzio
Parker v Ruiz would have been a good fight to have picked.
Re: PTBF 2016 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD
Posted: 06 Dec 2016, 07:13
by claudevsq
Tanzio wrote:Uchiyama v Corrales II, January 31, 2016 to decide it all?
You mean December 31?

Re: PTBF 2016 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD
Posted: 06 Dec 2016, 07:56
by Tanzio
claudevsq wrote:Tanzio wrote:Uchiyama v Corrales II, January 31, 2016 to decide it all?
You mean December 31?

Oops

yep