BoxRec

Stevieb8006 wrote:This forum seems to have gained lots of trolls, casuals and petty squabblers since I rejoined. It's like a pantomime.

Boxerbeetle wrote:

Stevieb8006 wrote:This forum seems to have gained lots of trolls, casuals and petty squabblers since I rejoined. It's like a pantomime.

Oh no it isn't.

keithmoonhangover wrote:

Horse wrote:

rd350lc wrote:His opinions are plentyful , but the trouble is he does not respect anybody else's .

Some opinions do not deserve respect.

Errr.... like yours.

Boxerbeetle wrote:

Stevieb8006 wrote:This forum seems to have gained lots of trolls, casuals and petty squabblers since I rejoined. It's like a pantomime.

Oh no it isn't.

thechump wrote:

keithmoonhangover wrote:

Horse wrote:Some opinions do not deserve respect.

Errr.... like yours.

Haha,its good to av difference of opinions but wen you get called mong or get told to fucken stroll on because someone doesnt agree with what you say then what do people expect you to do? Sit there and take it? Dont think so call me and ill call you back,just because i dont agree that fury is the best boxer of this year last year this time or that time doesnt mean i hate him or im a troll its just my opinion,there are ways to disagree with someon ya know without throwing mud at them. Iv watched boxing for the best part of 30 years and iv had differences of opinions with lads in the boxing gym doesnt mean u call names,i picked danny williams to beat mike tyson and told a tyson fan in the gym he looked at me and said "are you having a laugh" its not about not liking mike tyson its was about the timing and the age of tyson,plus his performances and what he was saying before the fight,like he was only in it for the money now cause he has tax bills etc. I also picked margarito to beat cotto because of the styles,didnt know he had loaded gloves tho,margarito tall loves the uppercut and is one tough man,cotto has the peak a boo style and i thought the uppercuts would sicken him. I also picked fury to beat klitschko because of the styles as iv said in previous posts,im not a fury hater just think some ppl are going over the top with him. Some ppl probably said the same to ali fans back in the day or holmes fans back in his day. Time will tell and if fury beats wlad in the rematch and beats wilder ill eat my words,i think its possible he can do that but i also think its very possible he could get beat by both. I mean no malice to anyone just avin a debate ok chaps

FrozenMixedVegtables wrote:

thechump wrote:

keithmoonhangover wrote:
Errr.... like yours.

Haha,its good to av difference of opinions but wen you get called mong or get told to fucken stroll on because someone doesnt agree with what you say then what do people expect you to do? Sit there and take it? Dont think so call me and ill call you back,just because i dont agree that fury is the best boxer of this year last year this time or that time doesnt mean i hate him or im a troll its just my opinion,there are ways to disagree with someon ya know without throwing mud at them. Iv watched boxing for the best part of 30 years and iv had differences of opinions with lads in the boxing gym doesnt mean u call names,i picked danny williams to beat mike tyson and told a tyson fan in the gym he looked at me and said "are you having a laugh" its not about not liking mike tyson its was about the timing and the age of tyson,plus his performances and what he was saying before the fight,like he was only in it for the money now cause he has tax bills etc. I also picked margarito to beat cotto because of the styles,didnt know he had loaded gloves tho,margarito tall loves the uppercut and is one tough man,cotto has the peak a boo style and i thought the uppercuts would sicken him. I also picked fury to beat klitschko because of the styles as iv said in previous posts,im not a fury hater just think some ppl are going over the top with him. Some ppl probably said the same to ali fans back in the day or holmes fans back in his day. Time will tell and if fury beats wlad in the rematch and beats wilder ill eat my words,i think its possible he can do that but i also think its very possible he could get beat by both. I mean no malice to anyone just avin a debate ok chaps

Good post

G0mez wrote:I think it's great that Fury helped himself to the bar, gave loads of abuse out and got in Wilder's face.

He's entertaining and gives everyone something to talk about.

keithmoonhangover wrote:

G0mez wrote:I think it's great that Fury helped himself to the bar, gave loads of abuse out and got in Wilder's face.

He's entertaining and gives everyone something to talk about.

Don't you think Wilder had the right to an uninterrupted interview?

keithmoonhangover wrote:

G0mez wrote:I think it's great that Fury helped himself to the bar, gave loads of abuse out and got in Wilder's face.

He's entertaining and gives everyone something to talk about.

Don't you think Wilder had the right to an uninterrupted interview?

keithmoonhangover wrote:

thechump wrote:

keithmoonhangover wrote:
Errr.... like yours.

Haha,its good to av difference of opinions but wen you get called mong or get told to fucken stroll on because someone doesnt agree with what you say then what do people expect you to do? Sit there and take it? Dont think so call me and ill call you back,just because i dont agree that fury is the best boxer of this year last year this time or that time doesnt mean i hate him or im a troll its just my opinion,there are ways to disagree with someon ya know without throwing mud at them. Iv watched boxing for the best part of 30 years and iv had differences of opinions with lads in the boxing gym doesnt mean u call names,i picked danny williams to beat mike tyson and told a tyson fan in the gym he looked at me and said "are you having a laugh" its not about not liking mike tyson its was about the timing and the age of tyson,plus his performances and what he was saying before the fight,like he was only in it for the money now cause he has tax bills etc. I also picked margarito to beat cotto because of the styles,didnt know he had loaded gloves tho,margarito tall loves the uppercut and is one tough man,cotto has the peak a boo style and i thought the uppercuts would sicken him. I also picked fury to beat klitschko because of the styles as iv said in previous posts,im not a fury hater just think some ppl are going over the top with him. Some ppl probably said the same to ali fans back in the day or holmes fans back in his day. Time will tell and if fury beats wlad in the rematch and beats wilder ill eat my words,i think its possible he can do that but i also think its very possible he could get beat by both. I mean no malice to anyone just avin a debate ok chaps

I agree. I'm a Fury fan, have been from day one. Posted on here before the first Chisora fight that Tyson was going to be the World Champion. I'm a fan, but I'm not blind. I post that he'd lose to Povetkin, Haye and Ortiz and suddenly I'm 'not a true fan' or 'a troll'. I've got no time for some of the wankers on here and I'm close to jacking it in. It's a shame, because there are some great posters and some genuinely nice people on here.

rd350lc wrote:

keithmoonhangover wrote:I agree. I'm a Fury fan, have been from day one. Posted on here before the first Chisora fight that Tyson was going to be the World Champion. I'm a fan, but I'm not blind. I post that he'd lose to Povetkin, Haye and Ortiz and suddenly I'm 'not a true fan' or 'a troll'. I've got no time for some of the wankers on here and I'm close to jacking it in. It's a shame, because there are some great posters and some genuinely nice people on here.

Don't jack it moony , but do you not think that if Haye struggled to land on Klitschko that he would not have even more trouble with the dancing / singing one ?

keithmoonhangover wrote:

rd350lc wrote:

keithmoonhangover wrote:I agree. I'm a Fury fan, have been from day one. Posted on here before the first Chisora fight that Tyson was going to be the World Champion. I'm a fan, but I'm not blind. I post that he'd lose to Povetkin, Haye and Ortiz and suddenly I'm 'not a true fan' or 'a troll'. I've got no time for some of the wankers on here and I'm close to jacking it in. It's a shame, because there are some great posters and some genuinely nice people on here.

Don't jack it moony , but do you not think that if Haye struggled to land on Klitschko that he would not have even more trouble with the dancing / singing one ?

Styles make fights. Fury did great against Klitschko, but Haye is a different thing altogether. Fury is chinny and Haye would hit that thin clean.

rd350lc wrote:

keithmoonhangover wrote:

thechump wrote:
Haha,its good to av difference of opinions but wen you get called mong or get told to fucken stroll on because someone doesnt agree with what you say then what do people expect you to do? Sit there and take it? Dont think so call me and ill call you back,just because i dont agree that fury is the best boxer of this year last year this time or that time doesnt mean i hate him or im a troll its just my opinion,there are ways to disagree with someon ya know without throwing mud at them. Iv watched boxing for the best part of 30 years and iv had differences of opinions with lads in the boxing gym doesnt mean u call names,i picked danny williams to beat mike tyson and told a tyson fan in the gym he looked at me and said "are you having a laugh" its not about not liking mike tyson its was about the timing and the age of tyson,plus his performances and what he was saying before the fight,like he was only in it for the money now cause he has tax bills etc. I also picked margarito to beat cotto because of the styles,didnt know he had loaded gloves tho,margarito tall loves the uppercut and is one tough man,cotto has the peak a boo style and i thought the uppercuts would sicken him. I also picked fury to beat klitschko because of the styles as iv said in previous posts,im not a fury hater just think some ppl are going over the top with him. Some ppl probably said the same to ali fans back in the day or holmes fans back in his day. Time will tell and if fury beats wlad in the rematch and beats wilder ill eat my words,i think its possible he can do that but i also think its very possible he could get beat by both. I mean no malice to anyone just avin a debate ok chaps

I agree. I'm a Fury fan, have been from day one. Posted on here before the first Chisora fight that Tyson was going to be the World Champion. I'm a fan, but I'm not blind. I post that he'd lose to Povetkin, Haye and Ortiz and suddenly I'm 'not a true fan' or 'a troll'. I've got no time for some of the wankers on here and I'm close to jacking it in. It's a shame, because there are some great posters and some genuinely nice people on here.

Don't jack it moony , but do you not think that if Haye struggled to land on Klitschko that he would not have even more trouble with the dancing / singing one ?

rd350lc wrote:

keithmoonhangover wrote:

rd350lc wrote:
Don't jack it moony , but do you not think that if Haye struggled to land on Klitschko that he would not have even more trouble with the dancing / singing one ?

Styles make fights. Fury did great against Klitschko, but Haye is a different thing altogether. Fury is chinny and Haye would hit that thin clean.

I was thinking more of how ineffective Haye was against a "big" heavyweight , struggling to get anything clean off.

keithmoonhangover wrote:

rd350lc wrote:

keithmoonhangover wrote:I agree. I'm a Fury fan, have been from day one. Posted on here before the first Chisora fight that Tyson was going to be the World Champion. I'm a fan, but I'm not blind. I post that he'd lose to Povetkin, Haye and Ortiz and suddenly I'm 'not a true fan' or 'a troll'. I've got no time for some of the wankers on here and I'm close to jacking it in. It's a shame, because there are some great posters and some genuinely nice people on here.

Don't jack it moony , but do you not think that if Haye struggled to land on Klitschko that he would not have even more trouble with the dancing / singing one ?

Styles make fights. Fury did great against Klitschko, but Haye is a different thing altogether. Fury is chinny and Haye would hit that thin clean.

CharlesListon wrote:When Haye gets tagged he doesn't.

Grilling Machine wrote:

CharlesListon wrote:When Haye gets tagged he doesn't.

Not disagreeing, but he was stopped on his feet against Solis and Thompson, and he got back up against everyone else. I'd say vulnerable rather than chinny.

CharlesListon wrote:When Haye gets tagged he doesn't.

keithmoonhangover wrote:

rd350lc wrote:

keithmoonhangover wrote:
Styles make fights. Fury did great against Klitschko, but Haye is a different thing altogether. Fury is chinny and Haye would hit that thin clean.

I was thinking more of how ineffective Haye was against a "big" heavyweight , struggling to get anything clean off.

I agree, but all boxers are different. Fury's defence isn't as good as Klitschko's was when he fought Haye, Fury doesn't hit as hard as Klitschko back then.

Grilling Machine wrote:But then it possibly equals out with Haye's power versus Fury's. Fury needs his reach, and Haye needs his fleet-footedness of old. Chisora's handspeed isn't too bad, but his feet were too slow for Fury in their rematch.