BoxRec

sucracristo wrote: dude, then turn around and stop pissing. i haven't said poo about you, yet.
i made a valid point about the common use of the term in russian

Nope, you are mistaken.

sucracristo wrote:

Tanzio wrote:

sucracristo wrote:
no offense taken, because i used to speak the language and had russians in my house
and around me almost every day and have been there. i still recognize a lot of words
when i hear them but it takes me too long to remember what they mean and reply for
me to be able to hold a conversation. i have 2 brothers who speak it better.

This is exactly why I suggested that this thread was going into Offal Topic territory. Whether or not you have been to Russia and hung out with Russians and you once understood some Russian, your understanding of the history of and Russian perspective on Crimea is misinformed and I am not interested in getting in a pissing contest over it.

dude, then turn around and stop pissing. i haven't said poo about you, yet.
i made a valid point about the common use of the term in russian, dinkus

You come in here backing up a completely ignorant position on Crimea with you have been in the same house with Russians, once been to Russia and you once understood some limited Russian, and you call me "dinkus?"

Back away from the subject, dumbass.

jujigatame wrote:We're not supposed to get off topic here but "we gave it to you so we can take it back" is not valid by international law. Mexico can't just take back Texas because they feel like it.

Mexico can't take it back, because America would beat them easily.

jujigatame wrote:Crimea was part of Ukraine for 60 years before Putin got his nationalist panties in a twist over Euromaidan.

I suppose he was just meant to accept what was being done on his doorstep?

Horse wrote:

jujigatame wrote:We're not supposed to get off topic here but "we gave it to you so we can take it back" is not valid by international law. Mexico can't just take back Texas because they feel like it.

Mexico can't take it back, because America would beat them easily.

The US has the military capability to annex chunks of Mexico or Canada. That doesn't mean that it would be legal or that the rest of the international community would recognize the legitimacy of our claim when the dust settles.

Horse wrote:I suppose he was just meant to accept what was being done on his doorstep?

exactly

Do you think the French or Irish presidents have a place meddling in British affairs, on their doorsteps?

Tanzio wrote:

sucracristo wrote:

Tanzio wrote: This is exactly why I suggested that this thread was going into Offal Topic territory. Whether or not you have been to Russia and hung out with Russians and you once understood some Russian, your understanding of the history of and Russian perspective on Crimea is misinformed and I am not interested in getting in a pissing contest over it.

dude, then turn around and stop pissing. i haven't said poo about you, yet.
i made a valid point about the common use of the term in russian, dinkus

You come in here backing up a completely ignorant position on Crimea with you have been in the same house with Russians, once been to Russia and you once understood some limited Russian, and you call me "dinkus?"

Back away from the subject, dumbass.

ask any russian who is not a millenial what crimea oblast means.
i'm talking about shit about 2 levels above what you are reading off wikipedia.
you haven't the slightest idea what i know and don't know about anything, and
the fact that you have no idea what i'm talking about shows that. that's what
dinkuses do.

Counter-puncher wrote:exactly

Do you think the French or Irish presidents have a place meddling in British affairs, on their doorsteps?

We all meddle with each other as much as we can get away with.

If you don't fight then you will be worn down and dominated.

jujigatame wrote:The US has the military capability to annex chunks of Mexico or Canada. That doesn't mean that it would be legal or that the rest of the international community would recognize the legitimacy of our claim when the dust settles.

The U.S. is the international community.

Who's going to stop them?

sucracristo wrote:

Tanzio wrote:

sucracristo wrote:
dude, then turn around and stop pissing. i haven't said poo about you, yet.
i made a valid point about the common use of the term in russian, dinkus

You come in here backing up a completely ignorant position on Crimea with you have been in the same house with Russians, once been to Russia and you once understood some limited Russian, and you call me "dinkus?"

Back away from the subject, dumbass.

ask any russian who is not a millenial what crimea oblast means.
i'm talking about poo about 2 levels above what you are reading off wikipedia.
you haven't the slightest idea what i know and don't know about anything, and
the fact that you have no idea what i'm talking about shows that. that's what
dinkuses do.

Wrong again, dumbass, it is you who has no idea what you are talking about. You jumped into a subject that you have no business participating in. When you realized that you were out of your depth, instead of backing away you tried to cosmetically cover your ignorance like an old woman paints her face.

You are 100% wrong. Going back and editing your ignorant posts won't change that. I attempted to be nice about it but you insisted on doubling and tripling down on your utterly ignorant position.

I don't need to lift my leg higher than yours at the fire hydrant you scraggly chihuahua. The ethnic Russians and Ukrainians on this board have and will continue to school your dumbass.

Horse wrote:The U.S. is the international community.

What does that even mean?

jujigatame wrote:

Horse wrote:The U.S. is the international community.

What does that even mean?

You had to go and do it, dincha?

I gone done it?

jujigatame wrote:I gone done it?

You indeed have done did it.

jujigatame wrote:

jujigatame wrote:

Black Dynamite???

I'm very much looking forward to this. I'll be rooting for Alexander Povetkin.

Povetkin's Entrance Song

PredatorHayds wrote: Black Dynamite???

Hell yea!

jujigatame wrote:

PredatorHayds wrote: Black Dynamite???

Hell yea!

I threw that shit before I came in the room.

@Ryabinskiy says it's now set for May 21 in Moscow.

https://twitter.com/Ryabinskiy/status/7 ... 7026321408

Freedom2013 wrote:@Ryabinskiy says it's now set for May 21 in Moscow.

https://twitter.com/Ryabinskiy/status/7 ... 7026321408

Povetkin got a really stable planning, in the past few years he allways fights end may and in october.

Very good boxing card on May 21:

Salamov-Ajisafe
Bivol-Valera
Lebedev-Ramirez

http://boxrec.com/show/729884

Wilder will Ko Povetkin in 5

No US TV or does anyone think a US network will step in at the last minute?

Best Coast wrote:No US TV or does anyone think a US network will step in at the last minute?

The fight will not be at US prime time, Povetkin is completely unknown in US (never fought in US, and didn't have American opponent for about a decade)...Don't look like it...