Re: Next For Anthony Joshua?
Posted: 18 Apr 2016, 13:28
Why do you keep banging on about Tyrone Spong?asdfjkl wrote:Exactly, there's now finaly a Dutch immigrant boxing af the heavyweight league, and he's doing reasonable, but I don't think he will receive more opponends any time soon. Nick Webb (undercard David Haye) could be a good opponend, but since Nick looks so much like David Haye, I'm quite confident Nick doesn't dare to fight Tyrone Spong.Stuarty30 wrote:They're no bad at windmills tooasdfjkl wrote: The Dutch can probably easely dominate in the sport as well. There's a reason Tyson Fury often spars with Dutch kickboxers. The Dutch could probably dominate in Basketball as well, but for some reason they prefere "korfbal". The Dutch used to be the tallest nation in the world, that's why I mention them. I once hoped Olivier Richters would start boxing, but Overeem never introduced him in that sport.
Because he's a good fighter that deserves recognicion he doesn't yet have.fizzjambo wrote:Why do you keep banging on about Tyrone Spong?asdfjkl wrote:Exactly, there's now finaly a Dutch immigrant boxing af the heavyweight league, and he's doing reasonable, but I don't think he will receive more opponends any time soon. Nick Webb (undercard David Haye) could be a good opponend, but since Nick looks so much like David Haye, I'm quite confident Nick doesn't dare to fight Tyrone Spong.Stuarty30 wrote:
They're no bad at windmills too
Likewise AJ!Syntax Error wrote:If I was Hearn, I'd call Haye's bluff & offer him a shot next rather than wait until 2017.wesshaw1985 wrote:Hearn: Fury vs. Joshua possible for November, Joshua vs. Haye 2017 - http://www.BS.com/hearn-fury-j ... 17--103352
I know he's done nothing to deserve it, but he's been calling out Joshua & he's got a big profile, so the fight would sell out in a flash.
I'm dying to see Haye in a fight where the opponent isn't on life support.

Whoever you think is the most credible in the list Eddie spouts will be the one. "We're talking to the reps of Dogshit, Horseshit, Stiverne and Pigshit."Rob3_142 wrote:Surely Stiverne has to be still in the mix? He's got to bring more of a challenge than Breazeale, Molina or Miller? I mean this isn't a mandatory defence.
My understanding is that the voluntary defence still has to be someone in the top 15 but I may be wrong.Rob3_142 wrote:Surely Stiverne has to be still in the mix? He's got to bring more of a challenge than Breazeale, Molina or Miller? I mean this isn't a mandatory defence.
Also, does the winner of Parker/Takam become a mandatory? Or will they have a final eliminator against Teper?
And mine was posted first.expe wrote:There's already a thread on this, what happened to keeping everything streamlined?
You have the right ideaSklar wrote:Has anyone mentioned Audley yet?
Well don't get me wrong, I don't think that any American outside of Wilder is worth mentioning, but it's an American, end of. They want to crack the US market before they start setting up super fights in the fall. It makes perfect sense from a business perspective, but it just lines up a horrendous fight.Sklar wrote:Whoever you think is the most credible in the list Eddie spouts will be the one. "We're talking to the reps of Dogshit, Horseshit, Stiverne and Pigshit."Rob3_142 wrote:Surely Stiverne has to be still in the mix? He's got to bring more of a challenge than Breazeale, Molina or Miller? I mean this isn't a mandatory defence.
IBF's fault for stripping Fury of the belt! They're contributing to this circus!Maxsplit wrote:It's going to be Molina isn't it now he's appeared at #15![]()
A guy who was stopped inside a round by Arreola and knocked down 5 times and stopped by Wilder.
He's a part time school teacher who's looking like he's had 2 World Title shots in his last 3 fights.
This is why we shouldn't have champions who learn on the job ...
I thought Parker/Takam was a final eliminator, but I suppose that explains why the #1/#2 spots on the IBF rankings are blank.wesshaw1985 wrote:http://www.BS.com/ibf-outlines ... ne--103674
IBF is creating a tournament -
Chisora vs. Pulev - May 7th & Parker vs. Takam - May 21st
winners must face off before October 1st.
with the overall winner due to face Joshua by January 15th 2017...
I thought Pulev v Chisora was for the EBU title?wesshaw1985 wrote:http://www.BS.com/ibf-outlines ... ne--103674
IBF is creating a tournament -
Chisora vs. Pulev - May 7th & Parker vs. Takam - May 21st
winners must face off before October 1st.
with the overall winner due to face Joshua by January 15th 2017...
The IBS must see £££s in the midst.BillyTKid wrote:How is David Haye ranked number 12 by the IBF? I thought the Mori fight had some bullshit WBA angle? Boxing is mental.
Good shout.reggaereggae wrote:Would it be possible that Chisora pulls out of the Pulev fight and signs to fight AJ?
It would be an easy sell- yes Dereck has little chance, which Hearn will like, but his name is known and you know he talks so will create hype and PR. Joshua has a big following in the casual fan world and they don't know enough about boxing and will just love the hype = PPV buys = a self satisfied Eddie Hearn jacking off with a finger up his aris when he downloads the PPV buys figures...