Page 3 of 3
Re: Sulaiman Hints At LIL g Diss
Posted: 18 Apr 2016, 21:31
by dberry
$$Money$$ wrote:crusader wrote:Damn bro, he's such a victim isn't he.
Maybe if there's so much injustice here it's better to post elsewhere.
Apparently so when a few people can just ask the Moderator to ban someone and they do it but then claim the man was "trolling" even though nothing in his post indicate that.
I consider a Troll one who is making up BS without any facts or someone who starts a topic that has nothing to do with the subject of the forum just to start a name calling war.
From what I read those who came against koolc should be the ones who were banned because they were calling him names and he never insulted them.
Cmon Brut, I know you're a simple moron but even you should have, by now, gathered that bing outright disrespectful of and posting derogatory names of professional fighters is frowned upon here, how fucken thick do you have to be not to get that!? How fucken thick do you have to be to not understand when you aren't welcome here, as well!?
Re: Sulaiman Hints At LIL g Diss
Posted: 18 Apr 2016, 22:17
by ikorolev
Re: Sulaiman Hints At LIL g Diss
Posted: 18 Apr 2016, 22:29
by dberry
The Law wrote:$$Money$$ wrote:kidbazooka1 wrote:
Oh so when someone doesn't agree with you just kick them out.
Wow real mature stuff pal.
This forum would be a lot better off without childish posters like you.
Ive been on this board a lot longer than you and it was a great board, still pretty much is except for posters like you.
From what I gathered reading this forum it appears that way to me, are the Mods friends of these guys like this?
And who is this guy (Ricky)? He keeps calling me some Brut name or something; what's that about? I've already told him but he seems to have some personal issues with that guy and is taking it out on me.
Goodbye $$Money$$. It's weird that you claim that you don't know Brut but you post from the same ip address as him (also same ip as his KBB and Undefeated49-0 aliases)
Gold! "I am not Homer, my name is Don Incognito"
Re: Sulaiman Hints At LIL g Diss
Posted: 19 Apr 2016, 12:26
by apollo creed
I have the feeling that WBC are not so eager to strip Canelo if he doesn't want to defend his title against Golovkin at 160.
Re: Sulaiman Hints At LIL g Diss
Posted: 19 Apr 2016, 12:35
by ikorolev
apollo creed wrote:I have the feeling that WBC are not so eager to strip Canelo if he doesn't want to defend his title against Golovkin at 160.
They would have to give him some "in recess"/"emeritus"/etc. crappy title then. They are one of the sides who signed the agreement, so they don't seem to have other ways to back up.
Re: Sulaiman Hints At LIL g Diss
Posted: 19 Apr 2016, 14:32
by apollo creed
ikorolev wrote:apollo creed wrote:I have the feeling that WBC are not so eager to strip Canelo if he doesn't want to defend his title against Golovkin at 160.
They would have to give him some "in recess"/"emeritus"/etc. crappy title then. They are one of the sides who signed the agreement, so they don't seem to have other ways to back up.
Golovkin could pull out a
Graciano Rocchigiani on WBC if he gets played.
Re: Sulaiman Hints At LIL g Diss
Posted: 19 Apr 2016, 17:23
by montrealsuper
apollo creed wrote:ikorolev wrote:apollo creed wrote:I have the feeling that WBC are not so eager to strip Canelo if he doesn't want to defend his title against Golovkin at 160.
They would have to give him some "in recess"/"emeritus"/etc. crappy title then. They are one of the sides who signed the agreement, so they don't seem to have other ways to back up.
Golovkin could pull out a
Graciano Rocchigiani on WBC if he gets played.
Good point - WBC was crushed by that ruling too - i can see it happening again -
Re: Sulaiman Hints At LIL g Diss
Posted: 20 Apr 2016, 21:24
by Lancenix
apollo creed wrote:I have the feeling that WBC are not so eager to strip Canelo if he doesn't want to defend his title against Golovkin at 160.
Of course they won't because HBO money is involved. HBO has huge influence on this joke of a situation.