Page 3 of 3
Re: Worst televised promotion ever?
Posted: 22 May 2016, 20:58
by CaptainSpacerod
It was like a f4cking pantomime - a gaggle of barely recognizable celebrities, bit of a sing song, the occasional lol moment and some choreographed fight scenes to finish. In fairness it's not aimed at boxing fans it's aimed at vacuous fans of celebrities who liked Haye in that jungle show. If he can get even 10% of viewers of that dross to buy his PPV swansong vs Joshua in a couple of fights time he'll be laughing all the way to the bank.
Ron Mac is a class act, my favourite boxing commentator, but his style and delivery are all wrong for pissed up housewives. His over enthusiastic explanation of the origin of the boxing nickname "smokin" must've had em all reaching for the lambrini. The discussion at the end with the 3 other diminutive pundits gazing blankly upwards at the towering Ronald as he gave a neverending answer to a simple enough question was my comedy moment of the night.
Re: Worst televised promotion ever?
Posted: 23 May 2016, 04:42
by ste1983
if only they would have shown Markham/Mullender live instead of some night club owner in a 4 rounder just cuz he's Haye's mate, it would have gained an ounce of respect back.
Re: Worst televised promotion ever?
Posted: 23 May 2016, 06:44
by stujones
Tyson vs Savarese was worth it just to see Warren with a shiner and try to deny what had happened.
Ronald McIntosh next to Barry McGuigan made this Dave production worth it also!.
Re: Worst televised promotion ever?
Posted: 23 May 2016, 10:37
by Muttley
The question i'd be asking is how did the British Boxing Board of Control sanction the fights in the first place? The once high standards of The board has become more and more slack every year. Very worrying times
Re: Worst televised promotion ever?
Posted: 23 May 2016, 14:23
by magnus
Muttley wrote:The question i'd be asking is how did the British Boxing Board of Control sanction the fights in the first place? The once high standards of The board has become more and more slack every year. Very worrying times
Haven't the Board always sanctioned some fights that are shite though? Are these times genuinely more worrying that the 1980s (say) for matchmaking?
Re: Worst televised promotion ever?
Posted: 24 May 2016, 08:47
by stujones
Muttley wrote:The question i'd be asking is how did the British Boxing Board of Control sanction the fights in the first place? The once high standards of The board has become more and more slack every year. Very worrying times
Remembering they did not allow Castro fight Maccarinelli - and Castro was on a decent winning run and was geniune top 20 (ish) at the time.
Briggs' opposition since Klitchsko have been a disagrace and I do fear Haye vs Briggs will leave the BBBoC with serious egg on face. Briggs was breathing heavy before finishing that guy at the weekend. Briggs has a cast iron chin, but I can see a beat down something similar to Klitchsko vs Mercer.
Re: Worst televised promotion ever?
Posted: 24 May 2016, 10:33
by bigjack
Muttley wrote:The question i'd be asking is how did the British Boxing Board of Control sanction the fights in the first place? The once high standards of The board has become more and more slack every year. Very worrying times
Chuck Gardner was much worse all those years ago.