Brook vs Vargas 3rd September
Re: Brook vs Vargas 3rd September
PPV or not ?
Re: Brook vs Vargas 3rd September
tony1234 wrote:PPV or not ?
100 % PPV it shouldn't be but Vargas will be getting an absolute mint to come over.
Re: Brook vs Vargas 3rd September
Spence might say that, but his team keep telling Hearn differently. If Spence did want the fight, how come Al Haymon has not made an offer to Brook?lefty wrote:Erroll Spence was willing to fight him now.BigDoofus wrote:Spot on. Mayweather has commented that none of the top guys will fight Brook.mickey1975 wrote:Brook isn't dodging anyone. He is more frustrated than anyone by what's gone on. He would fight them all.
Re: Brook vs Vargas 3rd September
Why would they? Spence is nearly in a mandatory position.BigDoofus wrote:Spence might say that, but his team keep telling Hearn differently. If Spence did want the fight, how come Al Haymon has not made an offer to Brook?lefty wrote:Erroll Spence was willing to fight him now.BigDoofus wrote:
Spot on. Mayweather has commented that none of the top guys will fight Brook.
Re: Brook vs Vargas 3rd September
Brook has to gun for Spence?? I like it.
Suddenly the Vargas fight isn't good enough, but many were already whining about the apparently inevitable Brook v Peterson when it appeared Vargas was going to price himself out a few weeks ago.
World title unification, only 20 miles away from me. I'm chuffed. Really hoping this brings the best out of Kell, having a big fight at home. Will be really happy with a stylish and decisive display.
Suddenly the Vargas fight isn't good enough, but many were already whining about the apparently inevitable Brook v Peterson when it appeared Vargas was going to price himself out a few weeks ago.
World title unification, only 20 miles away from me. I'm chuffed. Really hoping this brings the best out of Kell, having a big fight at home. Will be really happy with a stylish and decisive display.
Re: Brook vs Vargas 3rd September
The Vargas fight was never that great. This is a guy that lost every round to Bradley and bar hurting Tim in the 12th round, nobody would have payed attention to him. He then wins a vacant title against some chinny unbeaten prospect and he's some elite welterweight. I could probably name 5 plus welterweights that would beat him.Autobarn wrote:Brook has to gun for Spence?? I like it.
Suddenly the Vargas fight isn't good enough, but many were already whining about the apparently inevitable Brook v Peterson when it appeared Vargas was going to price himself out a few weeks ago.
World title unification, only 20 miles away from me. I'm chuffed. Really hoping this brings the best out of Kell, having a big fight at home. Will be really happy with a stylish and decisive display.
Re: Brook vs Vargas 3rd September
Mandatory position means short-end of the purse. His team keeps telling Hearn they don't want the fight. Bradley doesn't want the fight yet. Haymon controls the other top welters (including Spence). He hasn't made Brook one offer for any of his fighters.lefty wrote:Why would they? Spence is nearly in a mandatory position.BigDoofus wrote:Spence might say that, but his team keep telling Hearn differently. If Spence did want the fight, how come Al Haymon has not made an offer to Brook?lefty wrote: Erroll Spence was willing to fight him now.
Re: Brook vs Vargas 3rd September
So when Spence gets himself into a mandatory position, do you think Brook will fulfill his mandatory or do you think he'll drop the IBF belt and keep the WBO strap if he beats Vargas OR move up to 155?BigDoofus wrote:Mandatory position means short-end of the purse. His team keeps telling Hearn they don't want the fight. Bradley doesn't want the fight yet. Haymon controls the other top welters (including Spence). He hasn't made Brook one offer for any of his fighters.lefty wrote:Why would they? Spence is nearly in a mandatory position.BigDoofus wrote:
Spence might say that, but his team keep telling Hearn differently. If Spence did want the fight, how come Al Haymon has not made an offer to Brook?
-
jameswilson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13439
- Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01
Re: Brook vs Vargas 3rd September
That will be interesting to see. I think winning the WBO gives Brook the opportunity to drop the IBF if another daft mandatory gets dropped in his lap, but Spence would be a fight that will likely be accepted by some fans. Needless to say we'd rather Garcia or the Porter v Thurman winner, or Khan.lefty wrote:So when Spence gets himself into a mandatory position, do you think Brook will fulfill his mandatory or do you think he'll drop the IBF belt and keep the WBO strap if he beats Vargas OR move up to 155?BigDoofus wrote:Mandatory position means short-end of the purse. His team keeps telling Hearn they don't want the fight. Bradley doesn't want the fight yet. Haymon controls the other top welters (including Spence). He hasn't made Brook one offer for any of his fighters.lefty wrote: Why would they? Spence is nearly in a mandatory position.
Re: Brook vs Vargas 3rd September
The next mandatory will be either Spence or Bundu I think. They're in talks to fight for that mandatory spot. Personally I couldn't care about Garcia or Khan. Garcia is too small for Brook I think and he'd get out boxed imo and Khan ie pretty washed up at this stage and would have gotten chinned by Brook anyway I think.jameswilson wrote:That will be interesting to see. I think winning the WBO gives Brook the opportunity to drop the IBF if another daft mandatory gets dropped in his lap, but Spence would be a fight that will likely be accepted by some fans. Needless to say we'd rather Garcia or the Porter v Thurman winner, or Khan.lefty wrote:So when Spence gets himself into a mandatory position, do you think Brook will fulfill his mandatory or do you think he'll drop the IBF belt and keep the WBO strap if he beats Vargas OR move up to 155?BigDoofus wrote:
Mandatory position means short-end of the purse. His team keeps telling Hearn they don't want the fight. Bradley doesn't want the fight yet. Haymon controls the other top welters (including Spence). He hasn't made Brook one offer for any of his fighters.
-
CaptainSpacerod
- Welterweight
- Posts: 3381
- Joined: 15 Dec 2015, 03:21
Re: Brook vs Vargas 3rd September
Of itself this is more like the kind of big fight we've been wanting to see Brook involved in even though Vargas is by no means elite. When factoring in his routine victories over a gaggle of overmatched opponents during the last 2 years it's not quite a big enough test to answer the questions that remain about how ambitious he really is.
Given his age, experience and record this has to be the start of a Froch like run of big fights vs the best names out there otherwise his career will peter out dogged by questions of what might have been.
Given his age, experience and record this has to be the start of a Froch like run of big fights vs the best names out there otherwise his career will peter out dogged by questions of what might have been.
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 23138
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: Brook vs Vargas 3rd September
It's all up to Camp Eddie! Parsons will tell you, he'll box anyone. Don't take my word for it.
Re: Brook vs Vargas 3rd September
It's an okay match in my opinion. Vargas is short of the division's elite, but I don't see many better fights for Brook that could've realistically been made for a similar date.
If Hearn and Top Rank have established a relationship maybe a Bradley fight can happen soon.
If Hearn and Top Rank have established a relationship maybe a Bradley fight can happen soon.
Re: Brook vs Vargas 3rd September
You're ignoring the fact that none of the top welters will fight Brook and criticising Brook for it. Spence could have boxed Brook now. Whether his team will want him to fight Brook within the next 9 months is unknown, but you're still trying to criticise Brook for it.lefty wrote:So when Spence gets himself into a mandatory position, do you think Brook will fulfill his mandatory or do you think he'll drop the IBF belt and keep the WBO strap if he beats Vargas OR move up to 155?BigDoofus wrote:Mandatory position means short-end of the purse. His team keeps telling Hearn they don't want the fight. Bradley doesn't want the fight yet. Haymon controls the other top welters (including Spence). He hasn't made Brook one offer for any of his fighters.lefty wrote: Why would they? Spence is nearly in a mandatory position.
Brook has already beaten Porter, but Haymon also controls Thurman, Garcia, Spence,Khan and previously Floyd. Given the huge amounts of money that Haymon has invested and that Floyd has claimed the other fighters are swerving Brook, why do you think that Haymon has not offered Brook a fight?
I'm expecting Brook to beat Vargas and perhaps fight Bradley as the others seem reluctant to face Brook.
Re: Brook vs Vargas 3rd September
Yeah, sure.BigDoofus wrote:You're ignoring the fact that none of the top welters will fight Brook and criticising Brook for it. Spence could have boxed Brook now. Whether his team will want him to fight Brook within the next 9 months is unknown, but you're still trying to criticise Brook for it.
Brook has already beaten Porter, but Haymon also controls Thurman, Garcia, Spence,Khan and previously Floyd. Given the huge amounts of money that Haymon has invested and that Floyd has claimed the other fighters are swerving Brook, why do you think that Haymon has not offered Brook a fight?
I'm expecting Brook to beat Vargas and perhaps fight Bradley as the others seem reluctant to face Brook.
Brook's not to blame for his horrendous career at all.
It's everyone else.
-
Switch hitter
- Middleweight
- Posts: 590
- Joined: 09 Aug 2014, 07:43
Re: Brook vs Vargas 3rd September
What is your problem with Brook ..... are you related to Khan or something ??Horse wrote:Yeah, sure.BigDoofus wrote:You're ignoring the fact that none of the top welters will fight Brook and criticising Brook for it. Spence could have boxed Brook now. Whether his team will want him to fight Brook within the next 9 months is unknown, but you're still trying to criticise Brook for it.
Brook has already beaten Porter, but Haymon also controls Thurman, Garcia, Spence,Khan and previously Floyd. Given the huge amounts of money that Haymon has invested and that Floyd has claimed the other fighters are swerving Brook, why do you think that Haymon has not offered Brook a fight?
I'm expecting Brook to beat Vargas and perhaps fight Bradley as the others seem reluctant to face Brook.
Brook's not to blame for his horrendous career at all.
It's everyone else.
Re: Brook vs Vargas 3rd September
Brook's record is not very good and his career has been boring.Switch hitter wrote:What is your problem with Brook ..... are you related to Khan or something ??
I don't like fighters like Brook and I feel the need to let everyone know about it.
-
sweetscience
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2816
- Joined: 22 Sep 2004, 09:09
Re: Brook vs Vargas 3rd September
Great commercial match
but... still wont tell me (and more importantly Brook) how good he is
he needs to grab this belt and go stateside
but... still wont tell me (and more importantly Brook) how good he is
he needs to grab this belt and go stateside
Re: Brook vs Vargas 3rd September
Horse wrote:Brook's record is not very good and his career has been boring.Switch hitter wrote:What is your problem with Brook ..... are you related to Khan or something ??
I don't like fighters like Brook and I feel the need to let everyone know about it.
Brook's career has been disappointing, he's got time though. After this he should move to the states for a couple of years
-
Switch hitter
- Middleweight
- Posts: 590
- Joined: 09 Aug 2014, 07:43
Re: Brook vs Vargas 3rd September
Fighters like Brook???......please explainHorse wrote:Brook's record is not very good and his career has been boring.Switch hitter wrote:What is your problem with Brook ..... are you related to Khan or something ??
I don't like fighters like Brook and I feel the need to let everyone know about it.
Re: Brook vs Vargas 3rd September
Black fighters, obviously.Switch hitter wrote:Fighters like Brook???......please explain
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 17105
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Brook vs Vargas 3rd September
Horse wrote:Black fighters, obviously.Switch hitter wrote:Fighters like Brook???......please explain
-
ThereByTheGrace
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 4016
- Joined: 04 Sep 2010, 05:22
Re: Brook vs Vargas 3rd September
Out of order mate
Re: Brook vs Vargas 3rd September
He's taking the piss ffs.
Re: Brook vs Vargas 3rd September
It's a good fight against a guy with a tiny profile, but probably the only guy they could get to come over here.