BoxRec. (And The Ring Magazine - or so i'm told, i don't buy it.)Horse wrote:Who ranked Santa Cruz as the No. 1?
British Top 30 P4P August 2016
Re: British Top 30 P4P August 2016
Re: British Top 30 P4P August 2016
Have you actually watched them fight? To say neither are beyond English title level is just silly and disrespectful. Both are above British title level.Horse wrote:Neither are far beyond domestic level whatsoever.Stuarty30 wrote:You're being extremely disrespectful to both Smith and Walsh. Both are undefeated former British champions and far beyond domestic level never mind English title level FFS! They are far more accomplished than the likes of Skeete (no disrespect).
Yes, they are.Stuarty30 wrote:Murray and Khan do deserve respect but they're not as good as you like to make out.
Murray is more famous for his losses and Khan hasn't won a meaningful fight in frickin ages!
Re: British Top 30 P4P August 2016
Lost, drew, lost.....Horse wrote:Martinez, Sturm and Abraham.Boxerbeetle wrote:Who has Murray beaten to justify such a high ranking?
Re: British Top 30 P4P August 2016
But with that logic, applying it to all the weight classes - that means that there isn't a Number One fighter of any of them.Horse wrote:None of the champions have any serious claim to being the No.1.
They have to fight each other to find out who is the best.
Because there just is not a fighter out there who has beaten every other Champion in his weight class.
Just going by your logic, Mr Horse.
Re: British Top 30 P4P August 2016
Murray is a British ATG.forcefraser wrote:We have been through this a million times but to no avail. Murray has not got ONE high level victory on his record, et not long ago he was about 5th on that list.
great guy, tough man, but always lost when he stepped up. He put up a great showing against Martinez and Sturm, but lost.
15th for Murray must be his lowest for years. Horse loves the guy, only slightly less than Khan.
Unfortunately most people are too dense to understand Murray's greatness.
Re: British Top 30 P4P August 2016
What's strange about the logic?Stuarty30 wrote:Hypothetically speaking though if he were to beat Canelo he would go from not being in your top 30 to what top 3/4/5?
He's better than you give him credit for. You have the British light middle champ above a world champ in the same division. Strange logic.
Liam Smith is an absolute joke of a world champion.
Re: British Top 30 P4P August 2016
He deserved the win in my opinion.forcefraser wrote:Correction he drew with Sturm(should have lost)
Re: British Top 30 P4P August 2016
I agree. He shouldn't be world champion but has a chance to prove himself next month. He's still a good fighter and above domestic level.Horse wrote:What's strange about the logic?Stuarty30 wrote:Hypothetically speaking though if he were to beat Canelo he would go from not being in your top 30 to what top 3/4/5?
He's better than you give him credit for. You have the British light middle champ above a world champ in the same division. Strange logic.
Liam Smith is an absolute joke of a world champion.
Re: British Top 30 P4P August 2016
I had Sturm winning. I thought Murray knicked it against Martinez and was unlucky. I thought AA beat him though.Horse wrote:He deserved the win in my opinion.forcefraser wrote:Correction he drew with Sturm(should have lost)
Re: British Top 30 P4P August 2016
Way too low?littlepug wrote:Mcdonnell is WAY too low on that list
How many places too low?
Re: British Top 30 P4P August 2016
What have you done for me lately?forcefraser wrote:Liam Williams in but no room for Paul Butler or Kal Yafai?
Butler beat Hall and was a "World Champion"
Williams beat Cocoran
Re: British Top 30 P4P August 2016
No.forcefraser wrote:Surely P4P is about how they rate right now? Not what their record "was" like.
Lower Khan by at least 4 places immediately.
Class lasts.
Re: British Top 30 P4P August 2016
Horse wrote:No.forcefraser wrote:Surely P4P is about how they rate right now? Not what their record "was" like.
Lower Khan by at least 4 places immediately.
Class lasts.
Re: British Top 30 P4P August 2016
3rd or 4th place for meHorse wrote:Way too low?littlepug wrote:Mcdonnell is WAY too low on that list
How many places too low?
Re: British Top 30 P4P August 2016
Khan was 24 when he last won a world title fight. He turns 30 soon.
-
forcefraser
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5462
- Joined: 17 Jun 2008, 06:15
Re: British Top 30 P4P August 2016
Horse, could you please post a photo of yourself.Horse wrote:No.forcefraser wrote:Surely P4P is about how they rate right now? Not what their record "was" like.
Lower Khan by at least 4 places immediately.
Class lasts.
My thoughts are that you are holed up in a silence of the lamb style room, covered in magazine clippings of Khan and Matthew Murray. Please put an end to these vile thoughts by posting a photo. I need to know that you are in fact just a regular bloke who enjoys trolling on a boxing forum.
I need closure on this, I need it badly. The thought that I am exchanging views with a potential MurrayKhan clad monster, sporting a front man fanny and red lipstick whilst he throws out incoherent one liners, disturbs me deeply.
Re: British Top 30 P4P August 2016
Ola out he has retired bring Liam Walsh in.
IMO Quigg down 2 and Joshua down 2.
IMO Quigg down 2 and Joshua down 2.
Re: British Top 30 P4P August 2016
I think Smith has a very strong argument for being on the list, but I don't see why his case is strengthened by his goldbrick title. He beat a soft opponent for it and has made defenses against two worse opponents, with Kelly being unproven beyond area level , and Radosevic being totally out of his depth the one time other time he faced a notable opponent.Crease wrote:Horse wrote:Out - (29.) Liam Smith![]()
How is Beefy out? I'm surprised at that, he's been fighting fairly regularly, is a reigning World Champion and has been knocking his challengers out convincingly.
Think there's definitely a lack of respect there, Mr Horse.
I often see people arguing that a fighter deserves a higher ranking due to their possession of some title, but being a title holder says little about a fighter's quality if we don't examine who the fighter has actually fought, and in Smith's case the best opponent on his record is arguably John fricking Thompson.
Last edited by crusader on 02 Aug 2016, 02:02, edited 1 time in total.
-
forcefraser
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5462
- Joined: 17 Jun 2008, 06:15
Re: British Top 30 P4P August 2016
By Horse's Khan logic, Haye should be above Brook as he has a far better record
-
handsofstone
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 23227
- Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28
Re: British Top 30 P4P August 2016
forcefraser wrote:Horse, could you please post a photo of yourself.Horse wrote:No.forcefraser wrote:Surely P4P is about how they rate right now? Not what their record "was" like.
Lower Khan by at least 4 places immediately.
Class lasts.
My thoughts are that you are holed up in a silence of the lamb style room, covered in magazine clippings of Khan and Matthew Murray. Please put an end to these vile thoughts by posting a photo. I need to know that you are in fact just a regular bloke who enjoys trolling on a boxing forum.
I need closure on this, I need it badly. The thought that I am exchanging views with a potential MurrayKhan clad monster, sporting a front man fanny and red lipstick whilst he throws out incoherent one liners, disturbs me deeply.
Re: British Top 30 P4P August 2016
Good point. But for whatever reason Haye doesn't have the appeal of Khan/Murray to Horse.forcefraser wrote:By Horse's Khan logic, Haye should be above Brook as he has a far better record
Re: British Top 30 P4P August 2016
Taking issue with Khan's recent resume is entirely fair enough, but a run of Collazo, Alexander and Algieri is in no way comparable to Mark de Mori and Arnold Gjergjaj.BigDoofus wrote:Good point. But for whatever reason Haye doesn't have the appeal of Khan/Murray to Horse.forcefraser wrote:By Horse's Khan logic, Haye should be above Brook as he has a far better record
I'm also very surprised at the devaluing of Fury's win here. I am a Frampton fan boy, and he definitely has the deeper resume but Fury's is a win for the ages, and I genuinely can't envisage a British fighter right now who could potentially register a better win.
Re: British Top 30 P4P August 2016
On paper. In the real world he hasn't beaten one fighter in the top 80.Crease wrote:Well that is subjective & maybe another conversation entirely.Horse wrote:Why should I respect him?
His opposition wouldn't even be good for a British or Commonwealth champion.
The fact remains however, that he is still a World Champion at Light Middleweight.
Re: British Top 30 P4P August 2016
brian13 wrote:Klitschko win is hands down the biggest win by anyone on the list. Fury deserves the number 1 spot. Frampton has done great things but beating Klitschko warrants the number 1 spot for Fury.
We also need to take into account in this when comparing, Fury cannot move up in divisions.
-
Boxerbeetle
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 32967
- Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59
Re: British Top 30 P4P August 2016
I think that's mainly down to the fight itself - it was frankly awful and barely a punch was landed by either fighter.chris123 wrote:Taking issue with Khan's recent resume is entirely fair enough, but a run of Collazo, Alexander and Algieri is in no way comparable to Mark de Mori and Arnold Gjergjaj.BigDoofus wrote:Good point. But for whatever reason Haye doesn't have the appeal of Khan/Murray to Horse.forcefraser wrote:By Horse's Khan logic, Haye should be above Brook as he has a far better record
I'm also very surprised at the devaluing of Fury's win here. I am a Frampton fan boy, and he definitely has the deeper resume but Fury's is a win for the ages, and I genuinely can't envisage a British fighter right now who could potentially register a better win.