Green: I'll sharpen up for Mundine. A whole new ballgame.

Tinnie
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4557
Joined: 05 Jan 2010, 06:31

Re: Green: I'll sharpen up for Mundine. A whole new ballgame.

Post by Tinnie »

Image

:lol:
Like a Boss
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 5863
Joined: 01 May 2012, 03:21

Re: Green: I'll sharpen up for Mundine. A whole new ballgame.

Post by Like a Boss »

DA GOOSE wrote:
Like a Boss wrote:
DA GOOSE wrote:Oh well me,Tinnie,Crusader and coneye aren't mainstream then.
True a lot better than this nauseating rubbish.
2012 :doh:

Any chance of posting anything that even vaguely represents news, and even better still news that's actually on topic?
bogan whisperer
Middleweight
Posts: 1668
Joined: 15 Aug 2013, 19:24

Re: Green: I'll sharpen up for Mundine. A whole new ballgame.

Post by bogan whisperer »

GhostBoxing15 wrote:
DA GOOSE wrote:
Like a Boss wrote:
So it seems. No big deal, and plainly there's no reason why people should be singling Green out for criticism for using a celebration that is being used widely.
True a lot better than this nauseating rubbish.
:lol: True Blue Aussie crook :lol: Can't believe people eat that poo sandwich & want more
Any chance of posting on topic?

Or are you just aiming to have yet another thread closed?
bogan whisperer
Middleweight
Posts: 1668
Joined: 15 Aug 2013, 19:24

Re: Green: I'll sharpen up for Mundine. A whole new ballgame.

Post by bogan whisperer »

GhostBoxing15 wrote:
bogan whisperer wrote:
GhostBoxing15 wrote:
:lol: True Blue Aussie crook :lol: Can't believe people eat that poo sandwich & want more
Any chance of posting on topic?

Or are you just aiming to have yet another thread closed?
What's the matter?, I think the thread went off topic about 12 posts back
You turning any thread even remotely to do with Danny Green into a hate fest that usually sees the thread being closed is becoming tedious. Your character assassination of Kane Watts that saw the most recent thread closure was not only uncalled for, it was nothing short of appalling.
Like a Boss
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 5863
Joined: 01 May 2012, 03:21

Re: Green: I'll sharpen up for Mundine. A whole new ballgame.

Post by Like a Boss »

http://www.couriermail.com.au/sport/box ... 352d03d0e2

Mundine is expected to begin sparring this week in Brisbane with Trent Broadhurst.

“Choc (Mundine) was ringside for the Green fight and he is very confident he will outbox Danny again,’’ said Mundine’s cornerman Chris McCullen, who also coaches Trent Broadhurst.

“I thought Kane would give Danny a tough night because he has an awkward style, is very strong and he can punch. And that’s the way it turned out.

“Kane was up in Brisbane sparring Trent, and Choc will do a lot of sparring with Trent as well. We’ve got four big strong guys at my gym in Logan – Trent, Adam Lovelock and Aaron and Daniel Russell. Choc loves working with those guys because they are big strong fighters with plenty of aggression just like Danny Green.’’
Like a Boss
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 5863
Joined: 01 May 2012, 03:21

Re: Green: I'll sharpen up for Mundine. A whole new ballgame.

Post by Like a Boss »

Danny Green has opened a slight favourite in the rematch.

Sportsbet have Green at $1.80 and Mundine $2,
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Green: I'll sharpen up for Mundine. A whole new ballgame.

Post by crusader »

Green should be more than a slight favorite.
Like a Boss
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 5863
Joined: 01 May 2012, 03:21

Re: Green: I'll sharpen up for Mundine. A whole new ballgame.

Post by Like a Boss »

crusader wrote:Green should be more than a slight favorite.
Those $1.80 odds for Green - almost even money - in a fight so many claim Mundine can't win, are generous.
DA GOOSE
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1160
Joined: 06 Jan 2013, 01:48

Re: Green: I'll sharpen up for Mundine. A whole new ballgame.

Post by DA GOOSE »

Jump on Green at those odds.
DA GOOSE
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1160
Joined: 06 Jan 2013, 01:48

Re: Green: I'll sharpen up for Mundine. A whole new ballgame.

Post by DA GOOSE »

bogan whisperer wrote:
GhostBoxing15 wrote:
bogan whisperer wrote:
Any chance of posting on topic?

Or are you just aiming to have yet another thread closed?
What's the matter?, I think the thread went off topic about 12 posts back
You turning any thread even remotely to do with Danny Green into a hate fest that usually sees the thread being closed is becoming tedious. Your character assassination of Kane Watts that saw the most recent thread closure was not only uncalled for, it was nothing short of appalling.
http://boxrec.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f ... y#p4421040

:doh:
bogan whisperer
Middleweight
Posts: 1668
Joined: 15 Aug 2013, 19:24

Re: Green: I'll sharpen up for Mundine. A whole new ballgame.

Post by bogan whisperer »

DA GOOSE wrote:
bogan whisperer wrote:
GhostBoxing15 wrote:
What's the matter?, I think the thread went off topic about 12 posts back
You turning any thread even remotely to do with Danny Green into a hate fest that usually sees the thread being closed is becoming tedious. Your character assassination of Kane Watts that saw the most recent thread closure was not only uncalled for, it was nothing short of appalling.
http://boxrec.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f ... y#p4421040

:doh:
:doh: How many threads have you had closed now? I wish kept count :OhYes:
bogan whisperer
Middleweight
Posts: 1668
Joined: 15 Aug 2013, 19:24

Re: Green: I'll sharpen up for Mundine. A whole new ballgame.

Post by bogan whisperer »

crusader wrote:Green should be more than a slight favorite.
Can see people loading up on Green at that price.
ClivePatrickLyons
Super Welterweight
Posts: 2811
Joined: 07 Aug 2014, 22:10

Re: Green: I'll sharpen up for Mundine. A whole new ballgame.

Post by ClivePatrickLyons »

bogan whisperer wrote:
crusader wrote:Green should be more than a slight favorite.
Can see people loading up on Green at that price.

Why do you think that more info please :box:
bogan whisperer
Middleweight
Posts: 1668
Joined: 15 Aug 2013, 19:24

Re: Green: I'll sharpen up for Mundine. A whole new ballgame.

Post by bogan whisperer »

ClivePatrickLyons wrote:
bogan whisperer wrote:
crusader wrote:Green should be more than a slight favorite.
Can see people loading up on Green at that price.

Why do you think that more info please :box:
You are not a gambler then?

Gambler's look for odds that are generous to the chances of a certain result happening.

The odds offered for Green, particularly if you think Mundine is little chance of winning, are pretty enticing.

Loading up means taking advantage of the good odds on offer and putting a decent wager/bet on it.
ClivePatrickLyons
Super Welterweight
Posts: 2811
Joined: 07 Aug 2014, 22:10

Re: Green: I'll sharpen up for Mundine. A whole new ballgame.

Post by ClivePatrickLyons »

bogan whisperer wrote:
ClivePatrickLyons wrote:
bogan whisperer wrote:
Can see people loading up on Green at that price.

Why do you think that more info please :box:
You are not a gambler then?

Gambler's look for odds that are generous to the chances of a certain result happening.

The odds offered for Green, particularly if you think Mundine is little chance of winning, are pretty enticing.

Loading up means taking advantage of the good odds on offer and putting a decent wager/bet on it.


No your wrong mate my 1st ever bet was when I was 6 years old when Vanderhum [not sure about spelling] won the Melbourne Cup been addicted ever since :lol: what I want to know is why you yourself see people loading up on Green what is the main reason you think Greeny should be loaded up on if you are betting on the outcome of this particular fight do you think Mundine is little chance of winning and if so why is he little chance of winning.
bogan whisperer
Middleweight
Posts: 1668
Joined: 15 Aug 2013, 19:24

Re: Green: I'll sharpen up for Mundine. A whole new ballgame.

Post by bogan whisperer »

ClivePatrickLyons wrote:
bogan whisperer wrote:
ClivePatrickLyons wrote:

Why do you think that more info please :box:
You are not a gambler then?

Gambler's look for odds that are generous to the chances of a certain result happening.

The odds offered for Green, particularly if you think Mundine is little chance of winning, are pretty enticing.

Loading up means taking advantage of the good odds on offer and putting a decent wager/bet on it.


No your wrong mate my 1st ever bet was when I was 6 years old when Vanderhum [not sure about spelling] won the Melbourne Cup been addicted ever since :lol: what I want to know is why you yourself see people loading up on Green what is the main reason you think Greeny should be loaded up on if you are betting on the outcome of this particular fight do you think Mundine is little chance of winning and if so why is he little chance of winning.
Most people see Mundine with little chance of winning. Anyone that feels that way would see the odds on offer as enticing and if they are gamblers they will probably have a dabble.
ClivePatrickLyons
Super Welterweight
Posts: 2811
Joined: 07 Aug 2014, 22:10

Re: Green: I'll sharpen up for Mundine. A whole new ballgame.

Post by ClivePatrickLyons »

bogan whisperer wrote:
ClivePatrickLyons wrote:
bogan whisperer wrote:
You are not a gambler then?

Gambler's look for odds that are generous to the chances of a certain result happening.

The odds offered for Green, particularly if you think Mundine is little chance of winning, are pretty enticing.

Loading up means taking advantage of the good odds on offer and putting a decent wager/bet on it.


No your wrong mate my 1st ever bet was when I was 6 years old when Vanderhum [not sure about spelling] won the Melbourne Cup been addicted ever since :lol: what I want to know is why you yourself see people loading up on Green what is the main reason you think Greeny should be loaded up on if you are betting on the outcome of this particular fight do you think Mundine is little chance of winning and if so why is he little chance of winning.
Most people see Mundine with little chance of winning. Anyone that feels that way would see the odds on offer as enticing and if they are gamblers they will probably have a dabble.

STOP SIDE STEPPING MY QUESTION OR WILL THE TRUTH HURT YOU :oo
ClivePatrickLyons
Super Welterweight
Posts: 2811
Joined: 07 Aug 2014, 22:10

Re: Green: I'll sharpen up for Mundine. A whole new ballgame.

Post by ClivePatrickLyons »

Ok we'll do it this way if the size difference wasn't so one-sided would you be loading up on your man Danny ;-) ;-) ;-) ;-) ;-)
bogan whisperer
Middleweight
Posts: 1668
Joined: 15 Aug 2013, 19:24

Re: Green: I'll sharpen up for Mundine. A whole new ballgame.

Post by bogan whisperer »

ClivePatrickLyons wrote:
bogan whisperer wrote:
ClivePatrickLyons wrote:


No your wrong mate my 1st ever bet was when I was 6 years old when Vanderhum [not sure about spelling] won the Melbourne Cup been addicted ever since :lol: what I want to know is why you yourself see people loading up on Green what is the main reason you think Greeny should be loaded up on if you are betting on the outcome of this particular fight do you think Mundine is little chance of winning and if so why is he little chance of winning.
Most people see Mundine with little chance of winning. Anyone that feels that way would see the odds on offer as enticing and if they are gamblers they will probably have a dabble.

STOP SIDE STEPPING MY QUESTION OR WILL THE TRUTH HURT YOU :oo
I answered your question twice already :doh:

If I wanted to answer an endless list of other questions I'd redo our census :lol:
bogan whisperer
Middleweight
Posts: 1668
Joined: 15 Aug 2013, 19:24

Re: Green: I'll sharpen up for Mundine. A whole new ballgame.

Post by bogan whisperer »

GhostBoxing15 wrote:
bogan whisperer wrote:
:doh: How many threads have you had closed now? I wish kept count :OhYes:
How many Green threads are you in where you just can't seperate your tongue from his asshole :-P
By all means ramp up the personal stuff. It will shorten your stay here :OhYes:
ClivePatrickLyons
Super Welterweight
Posts: 2811
Joined: 07 Aug 2014, 22:10

Re: Green: I'll sharpen up for Mundine. A whole new ballgame.

Post by ClivePatrickLyons »

bogan whisperer wrote:
ClivePatrickLyons wrote:
bogan whisperer wrote:
Most people see Mundine with little chance of winning. Anyone that feels that way would see the odds on offer as enticing and if they are gamblers they will probably have a dabble.

STOP SIDE STEPPING MY QUESTION OR WILL THE TRUTH HURT YOU :oo
I answered your question twice already :doh:

If I wanted to answer an endless list of other questions I'd redo our census :lol:

How have you given me the answer twice...................All I want to know is it Greens power/speed/footwork/experience at the weight or will it be the true blue Aussie crowd that will get the BIG bloke over the line is it me and you or is it a cock or toooooooo is it standing by your mate when he's in a fight etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc fuc the census just give me a break down if your capable WHY SHOULD WE LOAD UP ON DANNY BOY IS THE QUESTION NOTHING MORE OR NOTHING LESS :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :wave: :wave: :wave: :wave:
GhostBoxing15
Welterweight
Posts: 246
Joined: 02 Sep 2015, 06:28

Re: Green: I'll sharpen up for Mundine. A whole new ballgame.

Post by GhostBoxing15 »

ClivePatrickLyons wrote:
bogan whisperer wrote:
ClivePatrickLyons wrote:

STOP SIDE STEPPING MY QUESTION OR WILL THE TRUTH HURT YOU :oo
I answered your question twice already :doh:

If I wanted to answer an endless list of other questions I'd redo our census :lol:

How have you given me the answer twice...................All I want to know is it Greens power/speed/footwork/experience at the weight or will it be the true blue Aussie crowd that will get the BIG bloke over the line is it me and you or is it a cock or toooooooo is it standing by your mate when he's in a fight etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc fuc the census just give me a break down if your capable WHY SHOULD WE LOAD UP ON DANNY BOY IS THE QUESTION NOTHING MORE OR NOTHING LESS :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :wave: :wave: :wave: :wave:
It's all about the mancrush, logic will not prevail
Locked