Re: Green: I'll sharpen up for Mundine. A whole new ballgame.
Posted: 09 Aug 2016, 02:58


2012DA GOOSE wrote:Like a Boss wrote:True a lot better than this nauseating rubbish.DA GOOSE wrote:Oh well me,Tinnie,Crusader and coneye aren't mainstream then.
Any chance of posting on topic?GhostBoxing15 wrote:DA GOOSE wrote:True a lot better than this nauseating rubbish.Like a Boss wrote:
So it seems. No big deal, and plainly there's no reason why people should be singling Green out for criticism for using a celebration that is being used widely.
True Blue Aussie crook
Can't believe people eat that poo sandwich & want more
You turning any thread even remotely to do with Danny Green into a hate fest that usually sees the thread being closed is becoming tedious. Your character assassination of Kane Watts that saw the most recent thread closure was not only uncalled for, it was nothing short of appalling.GhostBoxing15 wrote:What's the matter?, I think the thread went off topic about 12 posts backbogan whisperer wrote:Any chance of posting on topic?GhostBoxing15 wrote:
True Blue Aussie crook
Can't believe people eat that poo sandwich & want more
Or are you just aiming to have yet another thread closed?
Those $1.80 odds for Green - almost even money - in a fight so many claim Mundine can't win, are generous.crusader wrote:Green should be more than a slight favorite.
http://boxrec.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f ... y#p4421040bogan whisperer wrote:You turning any thread even remotely to do with Danny Green into a hate fest that usually sees the thread being closed is becoming tedious. Your character assassination of Kane Watts that saw the most recent thread closure was not only uncalled for, it was nothing short of appalling.GhostBoxing15 wrote:What's the matter?, I think the thread went off topic about 12 posts backbogan whisperer wrote:
Any chance of posting on topic?
Or are you just aiming to have yet another thread closed?
DA GOOSE wrote:http://boxrec.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f ... y#p4421040bogan whisperer wrote:You turning any thread even remotely to do with Danny Green into a hate fest that usually sees the thread being closed is becoming tedious. Your character assassination of Kane Watts that saw the most recent thread closure was not only uncalled for, it was nothing short of appalling.GhostBoxing15 wrote:
What's the matter?, I think the thread went off topic about 12 posts back
Can see people loading up on Green at that price.crusader wrote:Green should be more than a slight favorite.
bogan whisperer wrote:Can see people loading up on Green at that price.crusader wrote:Green should be more than a slight favorite.
You are not a gambler then?ClivePatrickLyons wrote:bogan whisperer wrote:Can see people loading up on Green at that price.crusader wrote:Green should be more than a slight favorite.
Why do you think that more info please
bogan whisperer wrote:You are not a gambler then?ClivePatrickLyons wrote:bogan whisperer wrote:
Can see people loading up on Green at that price.
Why do you think that more info please
Gambler's look for odds that are generous to the chances of a certain result happening.
The odds offered for Green, particularly if you think Mundine is little chance of winning, are pretty enticing.
Loading up means taking advantage of the good odds on offer and putting a decent wager/bet on it.
Most people see Mundine with little chance of winning. Anyone that feels that way would see the odds on offer as enticing and if they are gamblers they will probably have a dabble.ClivePatrickLyons wrote:bogan whisperer wrote:You are not a gambler then?ClivePatrickLyons wrote:
Why do you think that more info please
Gambler's look for odds that are generous to the chances of a certain result happening.
The odds offered for Green, particularly if you think Mundine is little chance of winning, are pretty enticing.
Loading up means taking advantage of the good odds on offer and putting a decent wager/bet on it.
No your wrong mate my 1st ever bet was when I was 6 years old when Vanderhum [not sure about spelling] won the Melbourne Cup been addicted ever sincewhat I want to know is why you yourself see people loading up on Green what is the main reason you think Greeny should be loaded up on if you are betting on the outcome of this particular fight do you think Mundine is little chance of winning and if so why is he little chance of winning.
bogan whisperer wrote:Most people see Mundine with little chance of winning. Anyone that feels that way would see the odds on offer as enticing and if they are gamblers they will probably have a dabble.ClivePatrickLyons wrote:bogan whisperer wrote:
You are not a gambler then?
Gambler's look for odds that are generous to the chances of a certain result happening.
The odds offered for Green, particularly if you think Mundine is little chance of winning, are pretty enticing.
Loading up means taking advantage of the good odds on offer and putting a decent wager/bet on it.
No your wrong mate my 1st ever bet was when I was 6 years old when Vanderhum [not sure about spelling] won the Melbourne Cup been addicted ever sincewhat I want to know is why you yourself see people loading up on Green what is the main reason you think Greeny should be loaded up on if you are betting on the outcome of this particular fight do you think Mundine is little chance of winning and if so why is he little chance of winning.
I answered your question twice alreadyClivePatrickLyons wrote:bogan whisperer wrote:Most people see Mundine with little chance of winning. Anyone that feels that way would see the odds on offer as enticing and if they are gamblers they will probably have a dabble.ClivePatrickLyons wrote:
No your wrong mate my 1st ever bet was when I was 6 years old when Vanderhum [not sure about spelling] won the Melbourne Cup been addicted ever sincewhat I want to know is why you yourself see people loading up on Green what is the main reason you think Greeny should be loaded up on if you are betting on the outcome of this particular fight do you think Mundine is little chance of winning and if so why is he little chance of winning.
STOP SIDE STEPPING MY QUESTION OR WILL THE TRUTH HURT YOU
By all means ramp up the personal stuff. It will shorten your stay hereGhostBoxing15 wrote:How many Green threads are you in where you just can't seperate your tongue from his assholebogan whisperer wrote:How many threads have you had closed now? I wish kept count
bogan whisperer wrote:I answered your question twice alreadyClivePatrickLyons wrote:bogan whisperer wrote:
Most people see Mundine with little chance of winning. Anyone that feels that way would see the odds on offer as enticing and if they are gamblers they will probably have a dabble.
STOP SIDE STEPPING MY QUESTION OR WILL THE TRUTH HURT YOU![]()
If I wanted to answer an endless list of other questions I'd redo our census
It's all about the mancrush, logic will not prevailClivePatrickLyons wrote:bogan whisperer wrote:I answered your question twice alreadyClivePatrickLyons wrote:
STOP SIDE STEPPING MY QUESTION OR WILL THE TRUTH HURT YOU![]()
If I wanted to answer an endless list of other questions I'd redo our census
How have you given me the answer twice...................All I want to know is it Greens power/speed/footwork/experience at the weight or will it be the true blue Aussie crowd that will get the BIG bloke over the line is it me and you or is it a cock or toooooooo is it standing by your mate when he's in a fight etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc fuc the census just give me a break down if your capable WHY SHOULD WE LOAD UP ON DANNY BOY IS THE QUESTION NOTHING MORE OR NOTHING LESS![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()