Page 3 of 3

Re: If Kell Brook defeats Gennady Golovkin...

Posted: 22 Aug 2016, 20:16
by ClivePatrickLyons
I'll go into shock and pass out :-P

Re: If Kell Brook defeats Gennady Golovkin...

Posted: 23 Aug 2016, 08:33
by caldo2025
If "If's" and "but's" were candy and nuts we'd all have a plentiful Christmas. Talk about a futile discussion. My money is on Kell Brook never ever getting into the ring with GGG and finding a way out of this one. But let's just say Brook is dumb enough to follow through with this one. He's got pillow hands in the WW division so we know that he's not going to have the power to hurt the granite chin that GGG's got. So does that mean that he's going to outbox GGG for the decision? GGG has twice the skills that Brook has. There's NO WAY Brook wins.

The greatest Middleweight in history will never lose to a mediocre Welterweight. Never happen. Make better use of your time.

Re: If Kell Brook defeats Gennady Golovkin...

Posted: 23 Aug 2016, 09:29
by Badhusker
caldo2025 wrote:If "If's" and "but's" were candy and nuts we'd all have a plentiful Christmas. Talk about a futile discussion. My money is on Kell Brook never ever getting into the ring with GGG and finding a way out of this one. But let's just say Brook is dumb enough to follow through with this one. He's got pillow hands in the WW division so we know that he's not going to have the power to hurt the granite chin that GGG's got. So does that mean that he's going to outbox GGG for the decision? GGG has twice the skills that Brook has. There's NO WAY Brook wins.

The greatest Middleweight in history will never lose to a mediocre Welterweight. Never happen. Make better use of your time.



Brook has pillow hands? No
Brook is a mediocre welterweight? No
Brook dumb enough to fight for several million dollars with basically nothing to lose? No
GGG is the greatest Middleweight in history? No With arguably his best win being a mediocre welterweight, assuming a win, best in history is more than just a little stretch.
:doh:

Re: If Kell Brook defeats Gennady Golovkin...

Posted: 23 Aug 2016, 13:00
by SFW
Brook is getting KTFO, anyway ya slice it. When he gets folded like a lawnchair, and the clean up crew wakes him up, I hope we all remember the bullshit we were saying before the hammer dropped.

Re: If Kell Brook defeats Gennady Golovkin...

Posted: 23 Aug 2016, 14:54
by caldo2025
Badhusker wrote:
caldo2025 wrote:If "If's" and "but's" were candy and nuts we'd all have a plentiful Christmas. Talk about a futile discussion. My money is on Kell Brook never ever getting into the ring with GGG and finding a way out of this one. But let's just say Brook is dumb enough to follow through with this one. He's got pillow hands in the WW division so we know that he's not going to have the power to hurt the granite chin that GGG's got. So does that mean that he's going to outbox GGG for the decision? GGG has twice the skills that Brook has. There's NO WAY Brook wins.

The greatest Middleweight in history will never lose to a mediocre Welterweight. Never happen. Make better use of your time.



Brook has pillow hands? No
Brook is a mediocre welterweight? No
Brook dumb enough to fight for several million dollars with basically nothing to lose? No
GGG is the greatest Middleweight in history? No With arguably his best win being a mediocre welterweight, assuming a win, best in history is more than just a little stretch.
:doh:
By your own rational, how could Brook be any better than a mediocre Welterweight when he's faced NO ONE. Porter is the only name on his win sheet that anyone knows and he got it by hugging him the whole fight and the decision could have gone either way.

In Badhusker's black and white world, the only thing that matters is how many Hall of Fame Fighters a person beat. He can't use his eyes to behold greatness in which a fighter dispatches world class talent with an ease that has never been seen before. So if Ali happened to fight in an era depleted of talent, he would cease to be great? You wouldn't know talent if it sat on your face and wiggled.

You have NO problem with labeling Brook as great WW without beating anyone great. But with GGG, you fail to use the same logic. You are a fraud my friend. No other way to say it. Your boy Brook will find a way out of this one. No way he steps through the ropes. He's got more excuses than you.

Re: If Kell Brook defeats Gennady Golovkin...

Posted: 23 Aug 2016, 16:20
by Badhusker
caldo2025 wrote:
Badhusker wrote:
caldo2025 wrote:If "If's" and "but's" were candy and nuts we'd all have a plentiful Christmas. Talk about a futile discussion. My money is on Kell Brook never ever getting into the ring with GGG and finding a way out of this one. But let's just say Brook is dumb enough to follow through with this one. He's got pillow hands in the WW division so we know that he's not going to have the power to hurt the granite chin that GGG's got. So does that mean that he's going to outbox GGG for the decision? GGG has twice the skills that Brook has. There's NO WAY Brook wins.

The greatest Middleweight in history will never lose to a mediocre Welterweight. Never happen. Make better use of your time.



Brook has pillow hands? No
Brook is a mediocre welterweight? No
Brook dumb enough to fight for several million dollars with basically nothing to lose? No
GGG is the greatest Middleweight in history? No With arguably his best win being a mediocre welterweight, assuming a win, best in history is more than just a little stretch.
:doh:
By your own rational, how could Brook be any better than a mediocre Welterweight when he's faced NO ONE. Porter is the only name on his win sheet that anyone knows and he got it by hugging him the whole fight and the decision could have gone either way.

In Badhusker's black and white world, the only thing that matters is how many Hall of Fame Fighters a person beat. He can't use his eyes to behold greatness in which a fighter dispatches world class talent with an ease that has never been seen before. So if Ali happened to fight in an era depleted of talent, he would cease to be great? You wouldn't know talent if it sat on your face and wiggled.

You have NO problem with labeling Brook as great WW without beating anyone great. But with GGG, you fail to use the same logic. You are a fraud my friend. No other way to say it. Your boy Brook will find a way out of this one. No way he steps through the ropes. He's got more excuses than you.
My boy Brook? Please.... If you look at any of my posts predicting the outcome of this fight, I picked GGG by KO without question. I have never labeled Brook as a great welterweight, but he is certainly not mediocre either. I have always thought GGG is a great fighter, but to say he is the best ever without even being tested against someone near his skill level is a stretch, like I said. If he would have challenged himself to fight Ward at 168 he could have proven something. He was fine at 168 against others, but not Ward. I don't care if they fight or not, but imo he should have. Regardless, I think he is a great fighter, just not best ever. I mentioned one time he kind of has Rocky Marciano syndrome, so to speak. A great fighter without a signature opponent in his prime to be thought of as an all time great.

By the way, Brook will fight. Its ridiculous to think he would back out. Sucking down in weight and fighting Spence isn't much better alternative, and for far less money. Not rocket science.

Re: If Kell Brook defeats Gennady Golovkin...

Posted: 24 Aug 2016, 00:29
by jewboypgh
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Surely none of those events was as shocking to you as Diaz giving Sammy a boxing lesson?
Saad,
Please suck a lemon. Vasquez will be back in the mix. Your just a hater who was raised wrong. Probably a Hillary supporter too

Re: If Kell Brook defeats Gennady Golovkin...

Posted: 24 Aug 2016, 01:19
by Butterbean
jewboypgh wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Surely none of those events was as shocking to you as Diaz giving Sammy a boxing lesson?
Saad,
Please suck a lemon. Vasquez will be back in the mix. Your just a hater who was raised wrong. Probably a Hillary supporter too
wtf. we have real people in the world that supports trump !?.. omg
and some of these are using non-logic arguments. surprice surprice.

southpark people are real....

Re: If Kell Brook defeats Gennady Golovkin...

Posted: 24 Aug 2016, 10:35
by Badhusker
Butterbean wrote:
jewboypgh wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Surely none of those events was as shocking to you as Diaz giving Sammy a boxing lesson?
Saad,
Please suck a lemon. Vasquez will be back in the mix. Your just a hater who was raised wrong. Probably a Hillary supporter too
wtf. we have real people in the world that supports trump !?.. omg
and some of these are using non-logic arguments. surprice surprice.

southpark people are real....
Imo, both Trump and Hillary are worthless candidates. The only thing I look forward to is the debates....they should be a good laugh. A lot of people are going to be voting for the lesser of two evils in this election.

Re: If Kell Brook defeats Gennady Golovkin...

Posted: 24 Aug 2016, 12:00
by Ilya Muromets
Butterbean wrote:
jewboypgh wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Surely none of those events was as shocking to you as Diaz giving Sammy a boxing lesson?
Saad,
Please suck a lemon. Vasquez will be back in the mix. Your just a hater who was raised wrong. Probably a Hillary supporter too
wtf. we have real people in the world that supports trump !?.. omg
and some of these are using non-logic arguments. surprice surprice.

southpark people are real....

Keep your retarded politics off the boxing board.

Re: If Kell Brook defeats Gennady Golovkin...

Posted: 24 Aug 2016, 17:06
by SaadOffTheDeck
jewboypgh wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Surely none of those events was as shocking to you as Diaz giving Sammy a boxing lesson?
Saad,
Please suck a lemon. Vasquez will be back in the mix. Your just a hater who was raised wrong. Probably a Hillary supporter too
I don't hate anyone that fights for my freedom. You're just a moron that cussed me out for saying Sammy turned down a fight with Spence.

Re: If Kell Brook defeats Gennady Golovkin...

Posted: 24 Aug 2016, 17:08
by SaadOffTheDeck
Not that it's relevant, I support Ted Cruz.