First off- when did I say anything about 'gay'? I called it a duck move, I'm pretty sure I didn't mention the word gay.crusader wrote:165 in the amateurs = 165-152+lefty wrote:He's not fought above 161 in the pro's although he has as an amateur. I'm saying the 164 catchweight stipulation is a duck in relation to him being willing to fight Froch and Ramirez at 168 when the latter in particular is enormous for the weight. The only reason his team (not saying it's him necessarily) were putting that stipulation out there is because they didn't fancy their chances and they wanted Ward to enter the ring weight drained.crusader wrote:
First, GGG has only had two bouts above MW and has never weighed above 161 (both of those were against weak opponents early in his career), so I find it a bit odd to say that he's ducking someone in a division he's never campaigned in. It would be a much different story if GGG won a lineal title at 168, stuck around to defend the title, but then dropped it upon being ordered to fight Ward.
Second, I don't believe your logic is on point, because wanting balanced conditions doesn't equate to ducking. As I said, GGG may well believe that he can beat Ward, but Ward is obviously a great fighter on another level to Froch/Ramirez, and considering the type of disadvantages GGG would be facing if he moved all the way up to 168 I think it's a fair compromise to meet in the middle. How is calling for that any more of a duck move than Ward being unwilling to budge and requiring that the bout is fought at a weight that benefits him but not GGG?
By the way, 178 in the amateurs goes down to anything above 165, so the weight Ward has mainly fought at as a pro would be included in that.
Regarding Ward's amateur career weight you've actually just bolstered my argument. So Ward could have been weighing it at 165 or the late 160's and was beating guys who were undoubtedly atleast in the 170's but yet Golovkin isn't or wasn't good enough to beat Ward at 168?
Also do you think it would have been deemed acceptable if Ward would have said he wanted to fight Kovalev at 171 1/2 lbs? There would have been an uproar and people (Golovkin fans in all likelihood actually) calling him a ducker and a coward and so on if he would have requested that catchweight. You know I'm not wrong on that either.
Do we know what GGG specifically tended to weigh when he boxed in that division as an amateur? I know that in 2002, as a 20 year old, he was still having bouts in the 152-141+ division (Ward was also 20 when he finished his amateur career at 178), so I wouldn't think that GGG was near the upper extreme of the 165 division. I'm not sure how much amateur weights matter anyway (you brought them up), as we can look at pro weights and see that GGG's only been above 160 twice and never strayed more than a pound above that; it's clear that he's not particulalry big for the division, and that Ward's weights and dimensions are much more in line with a natural 168 pound fighter. I think it's also obvious that neither Ward nor GGG have artificially deflated official fight weights due to Canelo-esque draining, so I don't believe it's a case of a CW being called for when the fighters are in reality pretty much the same size.
I'm not really sure how I've bolstered your argument. You don't know how much Ward's amateur opponents in the 178 class weighed, you don't know exactly how much he weighed, he was still heavier than GGG at the same age (at 20 GGG was the 152 pound Asian champ ), and if he really isn't that much bigger than GGG how is it much of a stretch for him to cut a few more pounds to reach 164? Why is an unwillingness to budge from 168 to fight a smaller man who only campaigns at MW not a duck move?
Ward has moved up to campaign at 175, and if he's going to challenge Kovalev for the latter's titles I think the full limit should be used. If GGG were to announce that he was fighting full-time as a SMW, had some bouts there at the full-limit, then demanded that a dangerous title holder meet him at a catchweight of 164 for a title fight, then I think it would be different. However, what we're actually looking at is a fighter who has stuck to fighting at 160, declaring that he wants to clean out the division and capture all the belts in the process. The fact that he's accused of ducking someone from a division he's never seriously fought at is laughable to me, as are the suggestions that him calling to meet Ward in the middle represents a 'gay' duck move, but Ward being unwilling to budge, when supposedly he isn't even that big of a SMW, doesn't.
And of course, this is all assuming that the 164 was actually put out there by GGG's team as the only option.
Okay here's Ward's gold medal match against Makarenko - https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=12Ujh_fT1l4
Do you really sincerely believe they look the same size? To me the difference in size looks comparable to Ward and Golovkin so if Ward was good enough to beat Makarenko for the gold surely Golovkin (with all the hype that surrounds him) is good enough to beat Ward?
Golovkin beat Dirrell at the olympics- a guy that competed in the same class with Ward for years as a professional and has also fought at light heavy as a pro.
Regarding the weight they weighed when they were 20, I'm not sure what that's got to do with what's occuring in 2016 or within the last few years?
For Hopkins first pro fight when he was 23 years old in 1988 he weighed 177 lbs - he weighed less than that when he fought Shumenov when he was 49. It doesn't necessarily mean anything.
Alvarez weighed 147 when he was 20. So would you say he's a smaller man than Golovkin?
Also If Ward surely isn't that much bigger than Golovkin and thus capable of fighting Golovkin at 164, why can't Golovkin do the same for Alvarez with no belt on the line?